I kept looking outside for growth ideas. New channels, new experiments, new strategies.
What I missed was that users were already telling me what to improve. Their complaints weren’t random. Their questions weren’t noise. They were a roadmap.
That’s why I built FeedBok. I needed a way to turn scattered user reactions into clear direction. Once I stopped hunting for big breakthroughs and started fixing repeated friction, progress felt steady instead of chaotic.
The biggest unlock wasn’t more traffic. It was better alignment with what users were already asking for.
That's quite interesting. But right now I am using the following pattern: each user request/complain/bug I store in DB. After some time another agent, which runs every X minutes (using github actions), just uses some prompt, + skills + MCP access to github issues, groups feedback messages, ranks them, and recreates more structured/sorted github issues with different labels which I work on.
Does FeedBok has some extra features (in comparison to my approach)?
this is so true and honestly something most founders get backwards. we spent months chasing new acquisition channels when the real signal was sitting right in our support tickets and bug reports. the moment we started actually categorizing and prioritizing user complaints instead of just "noting" them, our retention improved way more than any new feature ever did.
curious how you handle the volume though — once you have hundreds of feedback items flowing in, how do you decide what's a pattern vs just one loud user?
Understanding what your user actually wants, is the key to make a more better prduct.
This really resonates! Turning user feedback into actionable direction is so often overlooked. Love how FeedBok focuses on fixing repeated friction instead of chasing random growth hacks.
Talking to your users is so important.