24
8 Comments

The goal of community is not engagement

I've spoken about visions and not ideas in the past and how important it is to work towards and believe in something greater than one specific idea or project.

This week's post comes inspired by Rob Fitzpatrick and Community Camp. Earlier this week we held a space to talk about how four people started their communities, Rob was one of them.

For context, Rob has had some great success with writing books, The Mom Test being the most recognised book. Since then he's started a community to help people write useful books.

What makes a community successful?

One thought I have is that a successful community evolves around one core concept:

Getting people from A to Z.

How it happens varies. Everyone engages in different ways. Everyone seeks different opportunities. Everyone has different needs. It is this variety that makes community building so hard to measure.

Sometimes people need hand-holding for a long time.

Sometimes people just need a space to drop in, ask a question and get a good answer.

Sometimes people just want to read, watch discreetly and explore rabbit holes.

Sometimes people just have a lot going on in their own life.

Some people love written words. Others love audio or video.

We're all different, but mostly we all have some kind of personal goals we'd love to achieve.

When we think of community in this way, it becomes crazy to think we should measure the success of it on engagement. Engagement is almost irrelevant. What is important is if the community and the people within it are getting from A to Z.

What do your people want to achieve?

In Rob's case, his community is still very small and he felt iffy about focusing on vanity metrics. It felt wrong to be chasing and monitoring the discussions. And the more he thought about it the more he felt that a better thing to focus on, as a measurement of success, is how many people can he help write a bestselling book?

After all, that's really what everyone who joins his community wants. Their basic goal is to write a book, but really it's to write a book that people read. The icing on the cake is achieving the dream of a best-selling book.

When I was doing Ministry of Testing, my mind was always on how can I improve the industry and create better testers. This is a similar mindset. I kept an eye on things like discussions and traffic. I did things to create a great environment, but I didn't do it for engagement's sake. I did it because I believed that we needed to create better testers. All the things I did was in hope and belief that it would nudge people and the industry forward.

An online forum was part of that, as were a multitude of other things —for example, giving people opportunities, publishing, and running conferences. When I look at Ministry of Testing, for me it has been a success. Not because of money it has made. Nor the engagement that we can see. But more because it has changed software testers lives for the better. In the time of it's existence, the industry has shifted, and I believe Ministry of Testing had a big part to play in that.

But I can't measure all of it.

Community is only part of the business picture

I think the reality is that when we build community, it is not just community we are building. We need to become problem solvers. Communities are the ultimate 'mom test'. The discussions people have. The things they share. The struggles they deal with. All of these types of things are often openly, or semi-openly shared within community.

The challenge for communities, or the companies that support communities, becomes is solving people's problems. Only some of this can be dealt with directly via community.

In Rob's, Write Useful Books community. He can bring in experts to deliver value. He can help answer people's questions, as can the community. However, it can be a hamster wheel if we don't seek to do more than just that.

For now, Rob has written a book on how to write a book (how meta) to help people too. He's also building software to help people write books. There are now bestselling authors who can connect their success back to Rob.

When we start seeing it this way, we can see that community is core as a foundation, but what rises up from it does not necessarily look like community.

Looking at the whole picture

From this perspective, we need to start looking at community in a different light.

It's not about how much, or how active, or having an upwards growth chart.

It's understanding that investing in community gives you the roots and foundation to build many amazing things. I believe people are starting to see this. We can't just 'market' to people, increasingly people don't care, or don't listen.

The way through this is to build the trust through community, so that when you do have something to market, not only will people listen, they will also happily believe and share on your behalf.

✌️Learn more about community building by subscribing below.

  1. 2

    Hi, Rosie!

    I agree with your point of view about communities.

    I pay for belonging to communities where I don't participate every day nor week, but where I know it doesn't matter, because when I need to solve a problem, they help me (and I can do the same for them).

    I don't like communities where you are "obligated" to participate to be cool and "admitted".

    I love communities that get to the point! (And I try to create communities like that.)

    Thanks for sharing :)

  2. 1

    Great article :) thank you

  3. 1

    I agree. As brands, we are so focused on engagement. But consumers today have many questions and concerns. The objective should be to create a community that is a safe place to share and get answers. If engagement happens too, great!

  4. 1

    Thanks for writing and sharing this. I e spent some time as a community manager and frankly community and therefore communication are hugely fascinating to me but yes, I definitely agree. Community is immeasurable, it's a long game and it's important to ground that reality in people's expectations. It's simply an investment, in my opinion. It pays off consistently but maybe not in the most measurable ways.

  5. 1

    Hi Rosie. Community means different things to different people. There are many "free loaders" who prowl communities looking for what they can get for free. However, most people join communities or a community for a sense of belonging. Some join to learn new skills - like writing a book. I don't know how many members Rob has in his community or communities, but I have two communities with a total of about 200 members. Incidentally, one promotes book writing. It's called Book Writing Clinic and we are 102 in number, while the other is on Internet Mastery and we are about 90 in that community. Book Writing Clinic (BWC), which has not held any event in the past two and half years has generated about $6,550, while Internet Mastery, which I launched in July 2020 has so far generated about $10,833. This is the link to BWC members as I posted on ISSUU about two years ago: https://issuu.com/home/published/2bwc_alumni_members_-_portraits4

  6. 1

    Your approach is very interesting, thanks a lot.
    i shared your article with some of communities that i participated.

  7. 1

    @rosiesherry thanks for sharing! You've made great points and provided me with some fresh perspective on a communities utility to the members. :clap:

Trending on Indie Hackers
What you are currently working on? 113 comments IH invite system is broken 26 comments How this Reddit marketing tool used itself to grow to $5k/MRR 24 comments Roast my 3D landing page! 12 comments I'm 19, and I made $11,000 with Notion products. AMA! 11 comments Open-source, cross-platform, desktop app for sale 1 comment