The making of conversational UI: prompting/clicking or both?

One of the biggest shifts happening right now is that ChatGPT is no longer just a passive text engine, it’s becoming an actor in your software ecosystem.

With the introduction of connectors and agent mode, the boundary between “asking AI to help” and “AI doing work for you” is dissolving.

Through connectors, ChatGPT can tap into your Gmail, Google Drive, calendars, internal databases, and more, synthesizing data across tools you already use.

And with agents, it can not only read, it can click, fill forms, manipulate spreadsheets, or orchestrate multi-step workflows.

That evolution matters deeply for how we think about “prompting vs. UI.”
And one of the simplest questions about the future of software is:

What’s faster: clicking around in an interface, or prompting an AI to act on your behalf?

At first glance, it feels obvious: AI should win. Why waste time dragging blocks or formatting text when you could just ask for it?

But when you zoom out, speed isn’t just about how fast the software responds. It’s about how quickly you can iterate toward the result you actually want.

And in that sense, the future isn’t a battle between prompting and UI - it’s a partnership.

Two Kinds of Thinking

Most of what we do inside software falls into one of two modes.

Type 1: Execution.

These are mechanical, operational tasks, formatting a slide, adding rows to a spreadsheet, moving blocks in Notion. They’re structured, predictable, and visual. You don’t need creativity; you need control. And here, the mouse wins. Clicking through a UI is faster, less effortful, and cognitively lighter.

Type 2: Organization and Strategy.

This is the messy stuff, turning a brain-dump into a meeting summary, clustering ideas after a brainstorming session, or shaping raw notes into an outline. It’s abstract and unstructured. Here, prompting shines. You can ask an AI to “make sense of this chaos,” and it will — faster than you ever could manually.

This idea isn’t new, it echoes psychology’s classic distinction between System 1 and System 2 thinking, introduced by Daniel Kahneman. System 1 is fast, intuitive, and automatic, like clicking through familiar actions without much thought. System 2 is slow, deliberate, and analytical; the mode we enter when we need to organize, plan, or reason through messy problems.

Software today forces you to toggle manually between these modes, and the next generation will adapt to whichever kind of thinking you’re doing in real time.

Clicking is best for precision; prompting is best for sense-making

The Hybrid Workflow

The real magic happens when you stop thinking of prompting versus UI, and start moving fluidly between them.

You might ask AI to clean up your notes (a Type 2 task), then jump back into the interface to reorder or refine details (Type 1).

Each mode plays to the other’s strengths.

This back-and-forth, prompt, click, prompt again, becomes the new loop of productivity.

When Prompts Become Buttons

Over time, patterns emerge. You might find yourself typing the same prompt every morning:

“Show me my calendar events today.”

At some point, the system should notice.

Typing the same thing every day is slower than clicking once. So the prompt evolves into a button: “Show Calendar,” waiting for you next time you open the app.

Read more here: https://linkly.link/2GQdM