Validate fast The idea in your head is always perfect. The market never is. The sooner you test it with real users, the sooner you understand what actually matters and what was only in your imagination.
Pivots are a skill Your first idea will rarely be the one that works. The faster you can change direction without losing momentum, the faster you reach something people truly want.
Feedback is gold, ego is the enemy Every conversation with a user saves you from building something no one asked for. Listen more than you talk.
Speed matters more than perfection A simple version that solves a real problem beats the perfect version that arrives three months later.
Your assumptions are almost always wrong The market will surprise you. Let it. Adapt to it instead of fighting it.
The earlier you accept that a startup is an exploration process, not a straight line, the sooner you start building things that grow.
P.S. The original post was taken from HustleAdvisor: Original Post
I feel like this can apply to Beta testing as well. As new as I am to all this, from thought to real world, I have this approach in mind as we prepare for live testing. There have been good responses so far with the few people I have shared TierraNav with. To your point, though there has not been a lot of engagement, is it normal for this building stage to have limited engagement but real excitement? Good article.
Interesting... as a dev who strives for perfection, this is really difficult. But shipping fast and pivoting really is key.
For me the hardest part is when to validate the idea and to start building again once the idea is validated. I always find 1-2 people to validate the idea. The rest of the people that I show the application to dont even bother to go through it rigorously to actually provide any feedback
The hardest part for me is the tension between "validate fast" and "pivots are a skill" - at what point do you say "this isn't working, next idea" vs "I haven't found the right angle yet"?
I've killed ideas too early and persisted too long on others. Still haven't figured out that instinct. Maybe it comes down to whether you're getting closer to product-market fit signals over time vs just spinning wheels.
"Pivots are a skill" really resonates with me right now.
I'm currently pivoting my entire career path from a "Management/CEO" role back to a "Hands-on Builder" role because I see how AI is changing the landscape. It requires swallowing a lot of pride ("Ego is the enemy"), but the momentum I'm gaining by being closer to the code and the product is worth it.
Accepting that the path isn't a straight line is liberating. Thanks for the post.
Validation, speed, and listening to users are honestly the real unfair advantages. The sooner you treat a startup as exploration instead of execution, the faster things start clicking. Great insights!
Great insights! Love the reminder that validation, speed, and real user feedback matter more than perfect ideas. Startups really are an exploration, not a straight line. Solid advice for builders!
cool post