I analysed 510 websites competing across 41 commercial Google searches. The study covered 40.4 million ranked keywords, 312,535 first-place rankings and a crawl of 25,538 pages.
The sites with deeper topic coverage ranked higher inside the same search. The deepest quarter averaged position 9.5, compared with 13.5 for the shallowest quarter. Twenty per cent of the deepest group reached the top three, compared with 4% of the shallowest group.
This topical authority SEO guide turns those findings into a seven-step map you can build for one topic, then repeat for the next topic your buyer needs.
Use Distribb to turn a topic map into published pages with planned internal links.
The wider study included 510 websites. For the direct search comparison, I took 41 commercial searches and examined the top 12 companies competing for each one. That produced 431 websites fighting for the same searches.
For each competitor, I measured topic depth, topic pages, topic share, backlinks and total site size. Topic depth means the number of searches on that topic where the site already appears in Google. Topic share means the percentage of the whole site devoted to that topic.
Topic depth had a 0.329 correlation with a higher position. Overall site strength scored 0.198, backlinks scored 0.174, total site size scored 0.142 and topic share scored 0.006.
When I held backlinks and site size still, the topic-depth figure moved from 0.329 to 0.277. The chance of that result appearing randomly was under 1 in 100,000. When I held topic depth still, the backlink figure fell from 0.174 to 0.020.
This is observational data. It shows a useful pattern across sites competing for the same search, and it does not prove that adding pages alone caused a ranking.
The shallowest quarter averaged position 13.5 and put 4% of sites in the top three. The second quarter averaged 12.9, the third averaged 10.9 and the deepest quarter averaged 9.5. The difference between the two ends was 4.1 positions.
Among competitors with almost identical backlink counts, the site with deeper topic coverage ranked higher 57% of the time. When one site had three times the backlinks but the two sites had similar topic coverage, the site with more backlinks won 52% of the time. The pair tests support the larger analysis, but neither is strong enough to stand alone.
Topic share did not predict position. In a separate site-level comparison, I matched 62 pairs of sites with near-identical backlink profiles. Sites covering five or more topics had about the same number of first-place rankings as narrower sites and won 60% of the pairs. Seventy-seven per cent of the sites already ranked first in three or more sections of their own website. Fourteen per cent ranked first in one section only.
The 25,538-page crawl also found a basic internal-linking gap. The typical content page had 68 internal links, but only 10 sat inside the article copy. The other 86% came from navigation. The typical site had zero blog pages linking to a pricing, demo or quote page from inside the article text. Only 44% of sites put an author link on content pages.
Research pages and bylines had a different effect. Sites with a research or statistics page had 2.13 times as many websites linking to them. Sites using a real byline on more than half their pages had 2.19 times as many. Neither group had more first-place rankings after I accounted for those links.
A money page is the product or service page where an interested reader can become a customer. Pick that page first, then list the questions a buyer asks before acting.
Record the topic, intended audience, reason the business should cover it, search phrase, page type, money-page URL and owner. A product analytics company might choose its analytics product page, a broad guide to onboarding drop-off points and a supporting article about which product actions to track.
Allow 30 to 45 minutes for one topic.
Put searches on the same page when a reader expects the same answer. Use a separate page when the answer or format changes.
"Topical authority map", "how to build topical authority" and "topical authority template" may fit one practical guide. "Topical authority tools" usually needs a comparison page because the reader wants a list of products and selection rules.
Give every planned URL a row with its page type, question, title, facts, links, owner, status and publish date. Allow 60 to 90 minutes for the first topic.
The pillar is the broad guide that introduces the topic. It should point to each narrower article when a reader needs more detail.
Each supporting article should link back to the pillar with words that name the topic. Link the pillar to the money page when the reader is ready to act. A supporting article can also link to the money page when the product solves the problem described on that page.
Plan links between supporting articles only when the second article answers the next question. Allow about 30 minutes for the first diagram.
Create a second sheet with one row for each planned link. Record the source URL, destination URL, words the reader clicks, reason the reader needs the destination, topic, owner, status and last checked date.
Check the ledger after a new supporting page, a pillar rewrite, a money-page URL change or a statistics update. Open the source page and confirm the link reaches the final URL.
Allow about 30 minutes to build the ledger and ten minutes for each new page.
Put a real name on each article and link it to one author page. The author page should show the projects, studies, credentials and published work that help a reader check the writer.
Use the same author name and author-page URL in the visible byline and the article information stored in the page code. In this study, bylines were tied to more linking websites, but they did not produce a direct ranking advantage after backlinks were accounted for.
Allow 45 to 60 minutes for the author page and five minutes per article.
Choose one question buyers or writers need answered. Before collecting data, write the exact question, collection dates, inclusion rules and records you will count.
Publish the method, data you can share, findings, limits and visible update history. A product analytics company could review 100 onboarding flows and count how many ask for a credit card before a new user sees the product.
Supporting pages can quote one finding and link to the statistics page for the method. The statistics page should link to the pillar and the guides that help readers use the result.
Judge the page by new linking websites. The study found 2.13 times as many linking websites for sites with a research page, with no direct ranking lift after backlinks were accounted for. A small study may take one to five working days.
A site can cover several related problems for the same audience. A payroll product may cover payroll, hiring, benefits, compliance and workforce planning because the same buyer needs those subjects.
Open the next topic when the money page is chosen, supporting pages are mapped, the link ledger is ready, author evidence is available and someone owns the original study. The source data found no measurable penalty for covering a second topic.
Track each topic once a month. Count published pages, pages Google has added to its search results, pages with no internal links, links between the pillar and supporting pages, Search Console impressions and clicks, linking websites, money-page visits and sales.
Allow 30 minutes per topic each month, plus a full ledger check after a new pillar or statistics update.
Topical authority SEO is the work of covering one subject through connected pages that answer the questions a buyer asks. The map usually has a pillar guide, supporting articles, a relevant money page and contextual internal links between them. In this study, the plain depth of coverage predicted position while the percentage of the whole site devoted to the topic did not.
Start with one money page and map the questions a buyer asks before choosing that product or service. Give each distinct question one page, add one pillar, plan the contextual links and assign an owner. Add an author page and one original statistic after the first map is clear.
There is no fixed page count that guarantees topical authority or a ranking. The source study measured how many searches and pages a site covered on the topic, but the right number depends on the distinct questions the buyer needs answered. Stop splitting pages when two searches expect the same answer and format.
Backlinks still matter, but topic depth explained more of the ranking pattern inside these 41 searches. Topic depth scored 0.329 and backlinks scored 0.174 before controls. After holding topic depth still, the backlink figure fell to 0.020, so the source study suggests links may help by supporting wider coverage rather than lifting one shallow page above a deeper rival.
Yes, when the topics serve the same audience and lead to relevant products or services. Topic share scored 0.006 in the search comparison, and sites covering five or more topics won 60% of 62 matched site pairs. The data found no measurable penalty for adding a second complete topic.
The first four planning steps take about two and a half to three and a quarter hours for one topic. That estimate covers choosing the money page, assigning questions to pages, drawing the first link diagram and building the ledger. A complete author page adds 45 to 60 minutes, while a small original study may take one to five working days.
Which topic on your site has a money page but no complete map of supporting pages and internal links?
Use Distribb to turn that topic map into published, internally linked pages.