Trump just fired the US Copyright Office director after her report questioned AI training practices. President Trump fired U.S. Copyright Office Director Shira Perlmutter on Saturday, just one day after her office released a controversial report concluding AI companies' use of copyrighted materials may violate copyright law.
The timing raises questions:
Perlmutter was terminated by email with no formal explanation provided
Her firing came just two days after Trump also dismissed Librarian of Congress Carla Hayden, who had appointed Perlmutter in 2020
The Copyright Office had released Part 3 of its landmark AI copyright study on Friday (May 9), which questioned the legal status of using copyrighted works to train AI models
The report's conclusion:
The Copyright Office determined that "making commercial use of vast troves of copyrighted works to produce expressive content that competes with them in existing markets... goes beyond established fair use boundaries."
This position challenges AI companies like OpenAI and xAI that rely heavily on copyrighted materials for training
The report suggested licensing agreements between copyright holders and AI companies as the preferred path forward
Industry reactions:
The American Federation of Musicians stated Perlmutter's firing "will gravely harm the entire copyright community"
Music and publishing industries generally support the report's conclusions about licensing requirements
AI companies face dozens of ongoing lawsuits from creators alleging copyright infringement
The stakes for frontier AI labs:
If courts align with the Copyright Office's position, leading AI labs like OpenAI, Anthropic, and xAI could face significant cost increases for training data acquisition
Mandatory licensing would force AI devs to negotiate with publishers, media companies, and creator groups, slowing development cycles
Smaller AI startups with less capital could struggle to compete with established players who can afford licensing deals
Open-source AI models might face existential challenges without access to diverse training materials
The outcome could create a two-tier AI ecosystem: premium models trained on licensed content versus limited models trained on public domain materials
What's next:
It's unclear! Acting Librarian of Congress Robert Newlen notified staff of the changes but gave no timeline for appointing replacements.
I support Trump on this. Many so called "creators" have been abusing the copyright law to halt creativity and innovation for personal gains.
I don't like Trump, but I'm generally happy when anything happens that weakens copyright and patent law
You may not support Trump, but any action that weakens overly restrictive copyright and patent laws can feel like a win for creativity and innovation. Reduced intellectual property barriers often lead to greater access, collaboration, and progress.
I don't like Trump, but I'm happy anything happen against copyright.
Trump is in ANgry Bird Mood this week, dont know why
Although I don't like him very much, I support his approach in this matter!
really appreciated
I really support Trump on this.
I need help with something
I don't like Trump, but I'm generally happy when anything happens that weakens copyright and patent law
I may be missing the greater context of how politics is covered on this site, but I'm hoping political issues get generally low coverage. Please don't let this community get dragged into becoming another political comment battleground...
Thanks for your perspective! Totally agree — discussions here should stay focused on business and entrepreneurship. Appreciate your input.
Is this correct?
This comment was deleted 5 months ago
This comment was deleted 5 months ago
This comment was deleted 5 months ago