I'm wondering if anyone here uses AWS SES for both their transactional and marketing emails, using something like EmailOctopus or MuxEmail on top of SES.
It seems great because it saves a lot of money over the traditional marketing mail services, and I only need something simple for now anyway. However, everything I read says don't mix your transactional and marketing senders or you'll impact your deliverability or get blocked or something else. My service heavily relies on transactional email so I can't risk that.
Thoughts?
Why not use different SES endpoints? e.g. US East for marketing and US Central for transactional. To be on the safe side I would be tempted to use a different domain for marketing.
I hadn't thought about using a different SES endpoint. I wonder if SES would allow it they already gave me grief during the account approval for this first endpoint because they know I had a separate SES account for a different side project, I don't know if theyd approve another new one so early.
I could definitely use a separate domain though, you mean send my transactional through [email protected] and marketing through like [email protected]?
A guy on here wrote a very good article about cold emailing and he recommends using two domains. Check it out https://www.indiehackers.com/post/cold-emailing-a-masterclass-5e67ef495f
Yeah exactly.
Given the popularity of email platforms like SES, Mailchimp and others, I would be surprised if the spam filters paid too much attention to the senders IP address. I imagine the domain itself is far more important.
I thought about using something like [email protected] for transactional emails and team@mydomain-updates.com for marketing stuff.
Many services use Amazon SES, which allows them to offer competitive pricing. As you said, email octopus or https://mailpost.io/. I don.t see a problem to use these services.