I got tired of seeing founders build products nobody wanted, so I built VenturFit.
Over the past few months, I've been obsessed with one question:
Why do so many startups fail before they even get a chance?
The answer I kept coming back to was simple.
Most founders don't fail because they can't build.
They fail because they build something people never needed.
That's the problem I'm trying to solve with VenturFit.
VenturFit is an AI-powered platform that helps founders validate startup ideas before they spend weeks or months building them.
Instead of relying on guesswork, it analyzes an idea and provides feedback on things like:
Market potential
Competition
Target audience
Risks
Monetization opportunities
Actionable next steps
I'm building this in public because I believe the best products come from real conversations with founders, not assumptions.
This is still early, and I know there's a lot to improve.
If you're a founder, I'd love to know:
What's the hardest part of validating a startup idea before you build it?
Your feedback will directly shape the next version of VenturFit.
check out my website tryventurai.app
One thing I agree with is that the cost of building has dropped much faster than the cost of validating.
That makes understanding the problem earlier even more valuable, because shipping the wrong thing is easier than ever now.
Exactly. That's the insight that pushed me to build VenturFit. AI has dramatically lowered the barrier to building software, but founders still struggle with answering one critical question: "Should I build this at all?" My goal is to help reduce that uncertainty before people invest weeks or months into an idea. Thanks for sharing this perspective!
The part I'd be most curious about isn't whether an idea should be built.
It's how you decide that the current evidence actually justifies reaching that conclusion.
Those can sound similar, but they tend to produce very different products.
Happy to explain what I mean if it's useful. What's the best email to reach you on?