Hey Indie Hackers!
After 17 years in engineering, I’ve built HelpMeTest to solve my biggest pain point: I hate writing tests, but I can’t stand when my code breaks. I'm not good at marketing, so I want to ask:
Does LP speak your language?
Maybe I'm tone deaf to something that you'll notice?
Do you see clear call to action?
I’m looking for your honest feedback—what works, what doesn’t, and what can be improved.
Thanks for your help!
This is a good start but needs work
First off, the green is intense. It's ok to go for high contrast but if that is your goal, lose the other colors and only focus on the intense green. Otherwise tone it back. In general your design has too many colors. You need to reduce
I agree with the comment that your buttons are below the fold. You also need to proofread you text as there is a typo in your second line... "he is in rage" should be "he is in a rage". Pop your copy into ChatGPT and get it to proof it
The green/red combo in the costs section is not working. This is breaking one of the biggest color rules.... Don't use red and green together. They are complementary colors and red/green evoke the feeling of Christmas. This is not likely what you want your users thinking of when they are looking at a testing website.
You have a lot of sections and alot of blocks under each section. Pick a lane. Focus down on your primary user and lose the rest of the content. There is so much here, a user is not going to read it all. Instead of trying to capture all users, start by focusing on your primary user.
Tone down the green shadows, they impact the legibility of your copy
Thanks for review. That “Christmas feeling” make me laugh
no prob, yeah that one stuck with me in color theory class back in the day haha
I failed on that one because, in tests, you use green and red as pass and fail statuses, which is natural. However, that doesn't mean you can use them as foreground and background
Exactly, totally fine to use them semantically for success/error, just don't use them as backgrounds for non-status messages... and at the same time
Thanks incorporated your feedback in a new version. Link is the same: https://helpmetest.com/
Nice! That looks much better, way more concise content, I like it
Hey,
Hero is not in the viewport so buttons go below the fold. Appreciate the storytelling effort but texts need more work. You need to clearly say what it is, nobody has time to read all this stuff, especially devs.
Numbers could work if not fake.
I wouldn't go with showing negative things at all. Comparison is good, but it would be better to pack negatives on the left and show positives on the right so the message is clear.
A lot of the same sections with cards. Just show 5-6 main value props. If something is important either way show it differently.
What's on the roadmap doesn't matter really.
FAQ section is a plus.
Overall style is not my thing. Typography is not bad as there's some hierarchy, but different color taglines under headings doesn't work. Make taglines shorter.
Pricing needs some typography work. You have two pricing options, not sure if showing which one is popular works here.
Your last CTA section looks better than the first one, but copy needs work.
Hope this helps.
If you'd like to work with a designer feel free to reach out.
Thanks incorporated your feedback in a new version. Link is the same: https://helpmetest.com/
Hey, this is looking a lot cleaner! One thing I noticed, just under the hero, the heading’s left-aligned but the subheading’s centered, I’d keep them consistent. You could also add a testimonial with numbers after pricing and close with a clear CTA near the footer. An eyebrow like ‘AI Testing Tool’ above the hero would make it super clear what the product is right away. What you think? I do SaaS design and I’m taking on a few landing pages for my portfolio, happy to help if you’d like another set of eyes on this.
Thank for the review. I will reduce amount of text and colors
17 years in engineering shows - the product clearly comes from a real pain point. That's a huge advantage. Here's my honest feedback on the page:
The value prop lands fast. You hate writing tests, this writes them for you. Simple. But "vibe testing" as a term might confuse people who aren't already familiar with it. If I'm an engineer landing on this page from Google, I need to understand in one sentence what this does without knowing any buzzwords.
The biggest thing missing for me is a concrete example. Show me a before and after. Here's code without tests, here's what HelpMeTest generated. One real example would answer every question I have about whether this tool is actually good faster than any copy could.
Your CTA -I see it, but it doesn't feel urgent. "Get started" is generic. Something more specific like "Generate your first test in 30 seconds" tells me exactly what happens when I click and sets an expectation for how fast I'll see value.
One more thing — you said you're not good at marketing, but the fact that you built something from a real problem you've had for 17 years is the best marketing you could ask for. Lead with that story more on the page. Engineers trust other engineers who've felt the same pain.
If you’re vibe-testing a landing page, getting reactions from people who don’t already know you is the fastest way to spot confusing copy and weak positioning. I’ve been using tractionway.com for this — it gets honest feedback from verified humans in ~4 hours, and it also captures warm leads from the folks who actually resonate with the pitch.
Hi,
I’m specialized in CRO (Conversion Rate Optimization), which is the art of improving conversions on the web.
Right now, I’m offering completely free support for landing pages. Basically, I’ll audit your landing page and give you clear recommendations, both short- and long-term, to help boost your conversions, all based on research and proven methods.
I provide this service for free under these conditions:
Feel free to reach out if you’d like my help, or if you know someone who might benefit from it. Thanks for your time, and have a great day.
You can contact me at: tom.haug67@gmail.c o m
this is really bad. id imagine you arent getting any sign ups with this site. immediately your above the fold content is trying to be too clever but misses the point where it explains to me what it is, the unique benefit and why i should care. Nobody is paying for an app that cant even get its website done right and communicate its purpose. the text is way too oversized and looks weird. the color scheme doenst look accessible and also doesnt seem to have a strategic communication goal. The line height of your paragraph text is way to high and the shape of it is weird as well. Your logo is bad. the content is sparse and you really miss the chance to adress customer pain points while visually explaining your solution. faq before pricing cards is just weird. Everything just screams lazy and we didnt plan out the design phase and rushed straight into development without a comprehensive strategy.