We built an internal fix for context switching — curious how others handle this
We built an internal tool to solve a problem we kept running into as a team — too many tools, too much context switching, and work getting fragmented.
It started as a simple internal fix, not a product.
Now it’s at a stage where we’d like a few thoughtful teams to try it and tell us what actually works and what doesn’t.
We’re not selling anything and not launching publicly yet — just looking for honest feedback from people who deal with this kind of chaos daily.
If that sounds relevant to you, happy to connect privately.
www.omnex.tech
admin@omnex.tech
Context switching pain usually isn’t about the number of tools — it’s about losing decision state when work gets interrupted.
One way I’ve seen teams reduce this is by making it trivial to answer two questions at any moment:
What was the last decision? and What’s the next concrete action?
If those survive an interruption, switching costs drop a lot regardless of the stack.
Curious — when you tested your internal fix, what behavior change showed up first (fewer clarification pings, faster handoffs, shorter syncs, quicker re-entry after breaks)?