We built an internal tool to reduce context switching across chat, docs, and tasks — curious how others handle this problem
We built an internal tool to solve a problem we kept running into as a team — too many tools, too much context switching, and work getting fragmented.
It started as a simple internal fix, not a product.
Now it’s at a stage where we’d like a few thoughtful teams to try it and tell us what actually works and what doesn’t.
We’re not selling anything and not launching publicly yet — just looking for honest feedback from people who deal with this kind of chaos daily.
If that sounds relevant to you, happy to connect privately.
www.omnex.tech
[email protected]
Trending on Indie Hackers
This resonates — a lot of teams experience “tool overload” when the real issue is fragmented decision context, not just too many apps.
I’m curious: when you’ve used this internally, where did it help most — reducing handoffs, clarifying what to work on next, or keeping context intact across conversations?
I work with teams that hit this exact stage post-MVP, and I’d be happy to give honest feedback if you’re still looking for thoughtful testers.
That framing is spot on — it’s much less about “too many apps” and more about decisions losing their context as work moves.
Internally, the biggest impact so far has been keeping context intact across conversations. When a discussion, the related task, and the supporting doc stay connected, people don’t have to re-derive intent every time they switch modes. That, in turn, makes handoffs lighter and makes “what should I work on next?” more obvious without adding a new prioritization layer.
We’re still early, but that preservation of intent has mattered more than we expected compared to simply centralizing tools.
And yes — we’re definitely still looking for thoughtful testers. I’d really value your perspective and honest feedback.
Please check https://omnex.tech and fill the early access form to receive the link of omnex app (no credit), for any questions feel free to mail us at [email protected]
This resonates. In my experience, tools like this tend to reveal that context switching isn’t just about tooling, but about how many parallel threads and decisions people are holding at once.
Curious what patterns you noticed once the tool was actually in use.
That’s exactly what we’re seeing too. Once people stop bouncing between tools, the real friction shows up around decision density — too many open loops, not enough shared context.
We’re still early, but we’re testing how far we can reduce that cognitive load by keeping conversations, tasks, and docs in one continuous surface instead of stitched together tools.
If you’re curious, you can check it out here and get early access: omnex.tech
It’s a beta, so feedback is genuinely valuable — we’re shaping this with real usage, not assumptions.
If you try it and have thoughts or questions, feel free to reach me at [email protected].
This is a very real problem. Context switching between chat, docs, and tasks quietly kills focus more than most teams realize.
Out of curiosity, how are you handling the handoff between discussion and action? That’s usually where things fall apart for us.
Sounds like a solid direction, interested to see how teams respond to it.
Happy to share
You can check out our landing page and fill out the early access form there — once you do, we’ll send you the app link by email so you can explore the view and the tools inside. (No credit card needed)
www.omnex.tech
Thanks for reaching out — really appreciate the interest.
How does the view look like? I couldn't find any demo or anything on the landing.
Happy to share
You can check out our landing page and fill out the early access form there — once you do, we’ll send you the app link by email so you can explore the view and the tools inside. (No credit card needed)
Thanks for reaching out — really appreciate the interest.