After people started using Bunzee, a pattern kept showing up in the feedback.
They'd go through the competitor analysis, get the PRD, see the MVP scope and then ask:
"Okay, so... now what? I still have to figure out the actual screens myself?"
Honest answer: yes. That was the gap. The research was done, the strategy was clear, but there was still a wall between "I know what to build" and "I can actually hand this to a developer."
So we've been quietly building the next part IA structure and wireframes that flow directly from the PRD output. Same session, no switching tools, no starting from scratch.
It's not done yet. Still rough in a lot of places. But we're using it ourselves on every new feature decision, which is either a good sign or a sign we have no objectivity left.
The weird thing about building tools for founders is that you end up being your own most demanding user.
For those of you who've shipped something that goes from research all the way to design handoff where did the workflow break down for your users? Curious if the gap we're seeing is universal or just our specific users.