I'm going to skip the polished version of this week and just write what actually happened.
The thing I got right
I stopped treating onboarding as a setup problem and started treating it as a trust problem. Huge difference. Users weren't failing to complete setup. They were failing to believe the setup would be worth it. Once I started talking about the outcome before the steps, the drop-off point moved. Not fixed — moved. That's enough signal to keep pulling on.
The thing that humbled me
I thought I had my ICP locked. Week 12, and I realised I'd been optimising for users who were vocal, not users who were valuable. The loudest feedback was coming from people who weren't going to pay. The people who were paying were quieter, using it differently, and getting better results. I had to actively go find them and ask what was working. I should have done this in week 4.
The mistake wasn't building the wrong thing. The mistake was listening to the wrong signal for too long without checking who it was coming from.
What I'm carrying into next week
One question: if I could only talk to the users who are getting the most value, what would I learn that I currently don't know?
That's the work next week.
If you're in a similar spot — week 10, 12, 15, building something that's growing but not quite clicking yet — what was the unlock that changed how you thought about your users?