Spent the last couple days deep in comment threads here, and one conversation stuck with me more than anything I've read about growth tactics.
A commenter (75, self-employed since 1975) explained why cold outreach never once worked for him in 50 years, but reputation always did. His reasoning: he never built reputation directly, he left artifacts — a tool, a piece of work, a case study — that sat there being findable years later. One of his biggest clients found him through 2011 work, a decade after he'd done it and forgotten about it.
His exact line: "The work was the advertising, every time."
It reframed something I'd been doing without naming it. I've spent the last few days mostly showing up in genuine conversations (here, Reddit, wherever) instead of posting my own pitch everywhere. Turns out that's closer to "leaving artifacts" than I realized — a real answer to someone's real question outlives a post the way a portfolio piece outlives a pitch.
Small shift in how I'm thinking about the next couple weeks: less "how do I get StareBrain in front of people," more "what am I leaving behind that's still useful to find later."
Anyone else had a piece of advice from an unexpected source completely reframe how they think about growth?