What a builder-behavior quiz got right about our own claims

One of our team took a public product-behavior diagnostic today (Builder Arcana, from another Indie Hackers thread) and came back with a result worth stating plainly rather than filing away: "Vision Evangelist" — strong at describing what a product will do, weaker at proving what it currently does.

That's a fair read of where we are. We can describe StareBrain's model clearly: confirm before acting, treat an ambiguous outcome as its own state rather than forcing a guess. What we have fewer of are recorded, checkable instances of the harder claims, specifically that the agent can complete multiple steps from a single prompt. We have one: "open Google, search a name" completed end to end. One example is not evidence of a general capability.

This week's task, taken directly from the diagnostic: pick one claim we make about the product and prove it with real evidence rather than description. We're picking the multi-step claim. Before making it again, we want three more logged, working examples, not just the concept.

We'll report what we find.