2
6 Comments

What does it mean to build your product website or landing page?

Traditionally product webpages/landing pages meant creating a polished digital brouchure. Compelling headlines, feature lists, screenshots, pricing, customer logos and a contact form were considered enough to convert visitors to customers. You needed a designer, a developer, a copywriter (and maybe many other people) and they took a few months and many iterations to get it done. The process was slow and involved a lot of communication to set expectations and finally get it to what you wanted.

With most product websites now being built by AI, things did become much faster! For the first version of Illumea's landing page, I didn't design. Just gave the colours and asked Claude to build. It looked decent and conveyed the message. Reading through it and going through many others as well, they all looked and conveyed the same... "measurable business outcomes", feature blocks with same icons or the section-brows. So while trying to build something a bit more unique, we all built the same thing. Well, many of us are not "power prompters" who can get AI to build something different.

For the latest version of the landing page, I designed and mostly coded it as well. I did vibe-code many parts of it, at the same time, I took the help of AI to test different positioning, restructure sections, scafoldded the app and trusted it to code the blog section competely. It took 2 hrs for the vibe-coding part and about a week-and-a-half for design and development. That was quick! On the copy side, AI can make anything look polished. What it struggles with is clarity. The difference between a site that converts and one that doesn't is almost always the words, not the visuals.

As I learn more about using AI, here are a few things I noticed about building with AI:

  1. Vibe-coding the front end is fast but bloats quickly
  2. Be prepared to audit and fix security issues. AI can help, but it is not the best at it.
  3. AI copy is generic until you push it hard with specific positioning and your thoughts
  4. The real win is iteration speed. I can test a new angle or a design thought quickly
  5. Scaffolding & setup is faster as well

From the visitors angle, the website is becoming a conversation, not a destination. Your visitor lands on your site with a specific problem in their head. Something they need solved. Something they are maybe willing to pay for if the right product shows up. They don't want to navigate through a lot of information. It should be as easy as asking ChatGPT or Claude. We will get there sooner :)

The last point is basically where Illumea comes in, turning passive website visits into active, intelligent conversations that generate real insights.

on July 20, 2026
  1. 1

    I like the distinction you're making between AI accelerating execution and humans still being responsible for clarity.

    I'll be interested to see which kinds of conversations visitors choose to have instead of navigating the site. Those patterns will probably reveal what people actually need long before they reveal what pages they prefer.

    1. 1

      From the data I have been analyzing. I see two patterns:

      1. They want to know things up front rather than seeing complicated hero sections or reading through a lot of info, like cost and what do you get for buying the service. Visitors have asked questions falling into these categories within 5-10 seconds of visiting the site
      2. "hidden information" - this is especially for tourism industry where you want to know more than what the website probably has. This info is additionally ingested.

      The patterns depend on the industry. This number crunching is where AI can help as well and I use this quite a bit.

      1. 1

        Appreciate the context.

        The patterns you're seeing are interesting, especially the gap between what websites show and what visitors are actually trying to understand before making a decision.

        I have a few thoughts on how this could shape the product direction, but I don't think I'd do it justice in a public thread.

        If you're open to it, what's the best email to reach you on?

          1. 1

            Thanks! I’ve just sent it over.

            Looking forward to hearing your thoughts whenever you have a chance.

            1. 1

              Got it and replied as well.