1
0 Comments

What metric would convince you a website AI agent is real?

I’m building AnveVoice, and I’m trying to avoid the trap of optimizing for impressive demos instead of useful outcomes.

For a website AI/voice agent, what metric would actually convince you it is working?

Some candidates:

  • more qualified leads
  • higher pricing/contact-page conversion
  • fewer unanswered visitor questions
  • faster routing to the right human/page/form
  • more booked calls from existing traffic
  • support deflection
  • better lead quality even if volume stays flat

My bias: “number of AI conversations” is a weak metric. A conversation only matters if it moves the visitor closer to the right next step.

If you were evaluating this for your own site, what would be the one metric that matters?

on June 19, 2026
Trending on Indie Hackers
Priorities for launching a SaaS solo, with no budget User Avatar 210 comments I built a tool directory that doesn't pretend every founder has the same needs User Avatar 44 comments AI helped me ship faster. Then I forgot what my product actually does. User Avatar 9 comments I built a browser-based photo geotagging tool. What should I lead with? User Avatar 6 comments Why founder-led outbound breaks the moment you try to delegate it User Avatar 5 comments A one-week feature took two months, mostly spent keeping three systems in sync User Avatar 2 comments