As a founder, one of the best feelings in the world is seeing people actually use your product. But right after that high comes a flood of feature requests. Customers, friends, even your own team will start pitching ideas:
At first, it feels great. People care enough to suggest improvements! But then reality kicks in—you can’t build everything. Every ‘quick feature’ adds complexity, costs time, and risks turning your product into a Frankenstein of mismatched ideas.
So how do you handle feature requests without losing your mind (or your product vision)? After working with several SaaS founders and building software products myself, I’ve learned a few hard but valuable lessons.
When you’re small, every user’s voice feels important. But if you try to implement every request, you’ll end up building a product that pleases no one. Instead, categorize feature requests into these buckets:

Must-Haves: Features that solve a core problem or remove major friction.
Nice-to-Haves: Features that make things more convenient but aren’t dealbreakers.
Distractions: Requests that seem cool but don’t align with your vision.
How to Prioritize Effectively
One simple trick: When a feature request comes in, ask the user, “Would you pay more for this?” If they hesitate, it’s probably a nice-to-have, not a must-have.
Another approach is the RICE Scoring Model (Reach, Impact, Confidence, Effort):
A few vocal users will push hard for specific features. But just because they’re the loudest doesn’t mean they represent the majority.
A study by UserVoice found that only 1 in 5 feature requests actually improve customer retention. Meaning, 80% of what users ask for doesn’t actually make them stick around longer.
Look for patterns:
Users will often say, “I need X feature.” But what they really mean is, “I have X problem.”
Your job is to dig deeper.
Instead of blindly adding features, ask follow-up questions:
Rejecting a feature request is tricky. You don’t want to alienate users, but you also can’t build everything.
Every feature adds maintenance costs, complexity, and potential bugs. The more you add, the harder it is to pivot.
Slack’s CEO, Stewart Butterfield, once said:
"Every feature you add now is one you’ll have to support forever. Be careful what you commit to."
A bloated product leads to:
Slower development speed
Higher support costs
Confusing user experience
The best products often say “no” more than they say “yes.”
In the early days, your product is like a tree sapling—small, fragile, and growing in a specific direction. If you let feature requests pull it in every direction, it won’t grow strong.
Some of the most successful SaaS companies ignored feature requests to stay true to their vision:
Apublic roadmap can help manage expectations and reduce repeated feature requests. Tools like Trello, Notion, or Canny allow users to:
Feature requests are a sign of growth. But handling them well is what separates great products from bloated, unfocused ones.
How do you handle feature requests? Any tough decisions you’ve had to make? Let’s talk in the comments!
Great insights on managing feature requests! Prioritization and staying true to the product vision are key. 🚀👏
Handling feature requests as a founder can be tricky. Not every request is worth building—prioritizing based on impact and alignment with your vision is key. Customers often suggest solutions instead of sharing their real problems. Dig deeper to understand their needs before committing to new features. We’ve tackled similar challenges while refining our services at getseedsrighthere dotcom, ensuring we deliver exactly what customers need.
Awesome Article!
It makes sense to filter out Feature Requests.
Spot on! The hardest part isn’t getting feature requests—it’s knowing which ones to say no to. Have you ever had a feature request that you rejected, only to realize later that you should have built it? Curious to hear your experience!