6
8 Comments

Why Build In Public Will Doom Your Startup To Failure

The number one reason that 90% of all startups (indiehacker side projects & full-time bootstrapped or funded) fail is that:

They don't find breakthrough growth.

They never get to the point where growth comes easy and revenue and customers come flooding into the business.

Instead, they get forever stuck in this phase where growth is hard and slow and their startup doesn't make enough money to cover the founder(s) living & business costs.

Eventually, one of two things happens:

  1. The founder runs out of money and is forced to shutdown

  2. They give up thinking that the project won't work out

How Is This The Fault Of #buildinpublic?

Because it leads founders to make the two mistakes that stop 90% of them from finding breakthrough growth.

1. Spending too much time building and not enough time marketing

Although #buildinpublic makes founders feel like they are marketing, they really aren't. It's just an excuse that allows them to spend the vast majority of their time doing what they love (working on their project) and not enough time doing what they don't like but will actually grow their business (marketing).

This feeling is bolstered by the fact that they get likes, comments, and retweets from other founders and friends that support them. This gives them a big jolt of dopamine but at the end of the day it doesn't bring in revenue and customers (or not nearly enough to support them).

2. Selling only their product

#Buildinpublic ensures that the only marketing that you do is based solely on your product.

In other words, with #buildinpublic, the only thing that your marketing sells is your product.

And selling your product is a VERY ineffective way to grow any business (its what bought Apple to the brink of bankruptcy in 1997 - not my opinion but Steve Job's).

Why?

Because less than 2% of your target market is actively looking to buy right now.
These people/businesses are the only ones who will a) pay attention to your marketing about your product and b) buy it.

The remaining 98% will ignore your message.

Because they aren't looking to buy your product right now, trying to sell your product to them upfront will trigger loss aversion in them (a cognitive bias that motivates us to avoid loss more than go after gains) and they will ignore your marketing message.

But Why Not Just Target The 2%?

You might think "but why not just target those actively looking to buy".

But this is a BAD strategy.

  1. They are incredibly difficult to find (they aren't a static group)

  2. They are expensive to reach - the only way to accurately find them is to advertise or do huge amounts of SEO to get on the front page for buying keywords

  3. Even if you do find them, you're competing with EVERYONE else in your market. It becomes a game of "oh pick me instead of them please". Your chances of getting the customer shrink with every new competitor that joins your market (and every category is exploding with competition).

  4. Finally there just aren't enough of them to go around.

To Find Breakthrough Growth You NEED To Sell To The 98%

  1. They are easy to find (they are everyone in your target market).

  2. They are cheap to reach (social media, direct cold outreach etc.)

  3. Your competition is not targeting them (as they are too busy selling their products to the 2%).

  4. There are plenty of them to go around (and growing by the day).

But how exactly do you capture the attention of those not looking to buy what you sell and convince them that they need to buy NOW?

Well, you use a marketing strategy that is extremely effective at doing just that.

It's the strategy that:

  • Saved Apple from the brink of bankruptcy
  • Turned one-man solo side-project Bullet Journal into an $8 million-a-year lifestyle business
  • Grew HubSpot from a scrappy startup into an industry giant
  • Turned a husband and wife startup with an excel spreadsheet product into a thriving SaaS business called YNAB.
  • Made CrossFit a global phenomenon.
  • And more

To read about this strategy check out the full article right here - https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/why-build-public-doom-your-startup-failure-chris-monk

posted to Icon for group Building in Public
Building in Public
on December 9, 2022
  1. 2

    First you say find the 2% then you say no find the other 98%.
    I want to know your practical experience in buildinpublic and not what apple or hubspot did. Do you have practical real life experience as a proof to show that buildinpublic is ineffective?

    I read your profile history and you said PMF is a trap? Wow.

    1. 2

      Hey Alok,

      Thanks for the reply. Sorry must be a misunderstanding - the heading was a question: "But Why Not Just Target The 2%?"

      In terms of practical real-life experience, I've spent nearly 20 years selling and marketing all types of products and services. I've also built a number of successful products - namely dozens of industry events and meetups in everything from biotech, to finance, business intelligence, retail, and pharma with revenue ranging from a few thousand to a few million.

      Having spent tens of thousands of hours emailing, cold-calling, and advertising both the products I've created and those others have created I can tell that for a fact that the only people who are going to be interested in marketing messages that talk only about your product are those actively looking to buy right now.

      This is rarely enough to build a thriving business - as the 90%+ of startups who fail can attest to.

      Best

      Chris

      1. 1

        ah ok. sounds you really have much experience

  2. 1

    Nice preview but actually no useful info

  3. 1

    I tried to follow the article linked but damn, it’s so full of jargon and different idea threads weaving in and out I just got confused.

    1. 1

      Hey,

      Sorry to hear.

      Lemme know any questions and I’ll try and clear up any confusion.

      Best

      Chris

  4. 1

    Very clever! You use the BLUNT method to sell the BLUNT method by using said method. My mind is in knots :-)

    But seriously. Interesting idea.

    Can I just ride the coat tails of a bigger BLUNTer though? Let’s say for example a VC is spending millions promoting via BLUNT
    and educating. I could pop in as a cheaper/simpler
    version. See how many Vercels / Render clones there are. The reason I say is because I fear for the indie hacker BLUNT sounds too much like needing to educate people. Which might be hit and miss especially if I have no credentials.

    BLUNT also sounds like the MO for the diet and firnesst industry, would you agree? Need to do a Spinning TM class then some TRX TM followed by Bikram Yoga TM while on the Atkins TM diet …

    1. 0

      :-)

      I wouldn't suggest copying someone else's BLUNT belief unless you have a lot of money to burn. You're not going to get any attention. Ultimately, a BLUNT belief works because it leads back to your solution only.

      HubSpot tried to copy someone's belief in 2007 and barely generated any revenue (for a funded startup). It was only when they switched to a truly unique belief that led back to their solution only that growth took off - talk about it here: https://thebluntmethod.com/case-study-hubspot/

      No need for credentials - you create the belief, you are the defacto expert on it. To continue the HubSpot example, Dharmesh Shah wasn't a marketer yet he (and Brian Halligan) created a completely new approach to marketing.

      Oh definitely for diet and fitness industry. However (as the case studies on my website show), it can be used for virtually any business.

Trending on Indie Hackers
I spent $0 on marketing and got 1,200 website visitors - Here's my exact playbook User Avatar 73 comments Veo 3.1 vs Sora 2: AI Video Generation in 2025 🎬🤖 User Avatar 32 comments 🚀 Get Your Brand Featured on FaceSeek User Avatar 20 comments Solo SaaS Founders Don’t Need More Hours....They Need This User Avatar 19 comments Day 6 - Slow days as a solo founder User Avatar 16 comments Planning to raise User Avatar 12 comments