1
0 Comments

Why "Build in Public" Works Only If You Control Distribution

"Build in public" has basically become startup religion.

Share your progress.
Post your revenue screenshots.
Tweet your failures.
Users will come.

Sometimes they do.

Most of the time... nothing happens.

Not because your product sucks - but because attention is rented, not owned.

The uncomfortable truth

Build in public does not create distribution.

It borrows it.

When you post on X, LinkedIn, or Indie Hackers:

  • the algorithm decides who sees it

  • reach goes up and down randomly

  • yesterday’s audience is gone tomorrow

You're building your product in public… on someone else's land.

And landlords can change the rules anytime.

Visibility =/= distribution

A viral post feels like momentum.

Dopamine hits.
Notifications blow up.
Friends DM you "nice thread bro."

But momentum without control is fragile:

  • engagement spikes

  • followers pile up

  • signups trickle in

then... back to zero

Distribution means predictable access to buyers.

Not vibes.
Not likes.
Not one lucky post.

What control actually looks like

Founders who turn "build in public" into actual revenue usually control at least one of these:

An owned audience
Email list, community, customers.

A repeatable discovery surface
SEO pages, marketplaces, product directories, review platforms.

A feedback loop
Users who come back, not just scroll by.

Without one of these, you're basically a content creator with a side project.

Not a business.

A simple mental model

Think in layers:

Product > Narrative > Distribution > Revenue

Most founders stop at narrative.

They document.
They share.
They explain.

But they never anchor that story to something they control.

Practical example

You post weekly updates.

Cool.

Now what?

Where does a curious person go?

  • a landing page?

  • a waitlist?

  • a product profile on a discovery platform like Pitchwall?

  • a demo booking flow?

If the answer is "my Twitter bio link"...

You're one algorithm tweak away from disappearing.

That's a fragile funnel.

The difference between creators and founders

Creators optimize for:

  • reach

  • engagement

  • followers

Founders optimize for:

  • repeat discovery

  • user intent

  • conversion paths

Both can build in public.

Only one pays rent with it.

A better approach

Use build-in-public as:

top-of-funnel attention

But always connect it to:

  • one owned channel

  • one stable discovery surface

  • one conversion mechanism

Public building should feed distribution.
Distribution should feed revenue.

Not the other way around.

Final thought

Build in public is not a growth strategy.

It's a storytelling layer.

Without distribution control, you're performing.

With it, you're compounding.

on January 15, 2026