1
2 Comments

Why I Built NovaImage AI

The AI creative space is moving incredibly fast.

Every week there’s a new model, a new platform, and a new “all-in-one” promise. I found myself constantly switching between tools, managing different accounts, juggling credits, and rebuilding prompts just to move from an image idea to a usable video.

That frustration is exactly why I built NovaImage AI.

Why I Built NovaImage AI

I didn’t want to create another bloated AI platform.

I wanted something small, focused, and complete.

Instead of packing in dozens of overlapping models and confusing tiers, I carefully selected a compact but powerful stack—the models I genuinely believe creators need—and integrated them into one unified workflow.

The idea is simple:

Less clutter.
Less friction.
More shipping.

A Curated Creative Stack

For image generation, NovaImage AI is powered by Nano Banana Pro as the core engine.

I chose it because it consistently delivers:

Professional 4K visuals

Accurate multilingual typography

Complex composition handling

Multi-image fusion

Strong visual and character consistency

For faster idea exploration, I also included Nano Banana—lighter, quicker, and perfect for rapid iteration before moving into high-quality production output.

And when structured, knowledge-driven visuals are needed, Seedream 4.0 adds strong 3D scene understanding.

Each model has a clear purpose. No redundancy. No noise.

Cinematic Video, With Intentional Choice

For video, I didn’t want to overwhelm users with endless options. I focused on three distinct creative directions:

Use Sora 2 when you want film-level realism and cinematic texture.

Use Veo 3.1 when you need dynamic motion or action-heavy sequences.

Use Wan 2.6 when you want to experiment quickly and iterate fast.

The key difference is that you don’t have to leave the platform to use any of them.

You can move from concept image to refined visual to cinematic video, all inside NovaImage AI.

That workflow continuity matters more than people realize.

Pricing Philosophy: Fair, Predictable, Creator-Friendly

One thing I care about deeply is cost transparency.

High-end AI video and image tools are still expensive in many places. I wanted NovaImage AI to be accessible to indie hackers, creators, and small teams—not just agencies.

So I structured pricing to be roughly 50% more affordable than comparable platforms, while still including:

Commercial usage rights

High-resolution exports (up to 4K)

Professional output quality

No watermarks on finished work

And something I personally insisted on:

If a generation fails, you don’t lose credits.

You shouldn’t pay for errors. That’s a small policy change, but it changes how confidently people experiment.

Small, But Fully Capable

NovaImage AI isn’t trying to be the biggest platform.

It’s intentionally compact.

But within that focused structure, you can:

Create marketing visuals

Generate e-commerce assets

Build brand content

Produce social media videos

Prototype film concepts

Experiment creatively without worrying about cost leakage

I believe creative tools should reduce friction—not add new layers of management overhead.

Why I’m Sharing This Here

If you’re building products, running marketing experiments, or testing AI workflows like I am, you probably care about:

Speed

Cost efficiency

Output reliability

Workflow simplicity

Commercial safety

That’s exactly who I built NovaImage AI for.

It combines:

Nano Banana Pro for professional visuals

Sora 2 for cinematic realism

Veo 3.1 for dynamic scenes

Wan 2.6 for rapid experimentation

All in one streamlined workspace.

I’m still iterating quickly, and I’m genuinely open to feedback.

If you’re experimenting with AI-generated visuals or video, I’d love to know:

What slows you down the most right now?

Tool switching?
Cost unpredictability?
Inconsistent output?
Workflow fragmentation?

NovaImage AI is my attempt to solve those problems in a practical, creator-friendly way.

Thanks for reading—and I’m happy to answer any questions.

on February 13, 2026
  1. 1

    Nice focus on workflow continuity + predictable pricing. The “don’t lose credits on failed runs” policy is underrated — it changes user behavior fast. Have you considered surfacing a simple “model selector guide” (1‑2 lines on when to use each) inside the flow so new users don’t stall at choice?

    1. 1

      I really appreciate that perspective. Workflow continuity and pricing predictability were two things I personally struggled with as a user, so hearing this resonates means a lot.
      And you’re absolutely right about the failed-run credit policy. It’s a small detail on paper, but in practice it changes how confidently people experiment, especially early in onboarding.
      The model selector guide is a great suggestion. We’ve talked internally about reducing “first choice friction,” and a lightweight in-flow guide (something like 1–2 lines explaining ideal use cases per model) is very much aligned with how we want the product to feel—simple, fast, and decision-friendly.
      I’ll bring this back to the team and explore how we can surface it without adding UI noise. Really appreciate you taking the time to share this—feedback like this is incredibly valuable.

Trending on Indie Hackers
I built a tool that turns CSV exports into shareable dashboards User Avatar 82 comments $0 to $10K MRR in 12 Months: 3 Things That Actually Moved the Needle for My Design Agency User Avatar 68 comments Why Indie Founders Fail: The Uncomfortable Truths Beyond "Build in Public" User Avatar 64 comments The “Open → Do → Close” rule changed how I build tools User Avatar 52 comments I got tired of "opaque" flight pricing →built anonymous group demand →1,000+ users User Avatar 42 comments A tweet about my AI dev tool hit 250K views. I didn't even have a product yet. User Avatar 42 comments