3
2 Comments

Why Your Monitoring Strategy Is Incomplete

Hey IH đź‘‹

Last month, one of our clients had their entire checkout system go down. Their internal monitoring showed all green – perfect CPU, healthy memory levels, no errors logged.

But customers couldn't complete purchases. The culprit? A DNS issue that only external monitoring could catch.

This highlights a crucial reality for those of us building and maintaining systems: blind spots exist even in seemingly comprehensive monitoring setups.

Internal vs External: You Need Both

After helping dozens of DevOps teams improve their uptime, I've realized most monitoring strategies have a fundamental problem – they're either too internal or too external focused.

Internal monitoring watches your system health, resources, and logs. It's great at catching resource bottlenecks and application errors early.

External monitoring checks your system availability from outside your network. It shows you what users actually experience and catches issues with external dependencies.

Neither approach alone gives you the full overview.

A Simple Framework That Works

Here's a quick framework we've developed that has worked across different tech stacks:

  1. Set up internal early warnings:

    • Resource tracking (CPU, memory, disk)
    • Application logs with error rate alerts
    • Database performance monitoring
    • Service dependency checks
  2. Implement external reality checks:

    • Global availability from different regions
    • SSL and DNS monitoring (these silent killers cause major outages)
    • Critical user paths (login, checkout, core features)
    • API response times
  3. Connect with smart alerting:

    • Correlate internal and external alerts
    • Use different channels for different severity levels
    • Automate the obvious fixes

Start Simple

You don't need to monitor everything right away. Start with your most critical services first – focus on what directly impacts your users and revenue.

What We're Building

At Bubobot, we're building a solution for external monitoring. We've focused on making it simple to set up, real-time monitoring with 20-s interval, 20+ integrations.

I'd love to hear how you're handling monitoring for your products! What's working? What's been challenging?

#MonitoringTools #InternalVsExternal #ITManagement

Read more: https://bubobot.com/blog/external-vs-internal-monitoring-which-is-better-for-uptime

posted to Icon for group Developers
Developers
on April 17, 2025
  1. 1

    Great insights, Tom! The discussion on the importance of both internal and external monitoring really resonates with me, especially considering the security implications. It's crucial to ensure that our systems are not only functioning well internally but also resilient against external threats. I’m particularly interested in how external monitoring can help identify vulnerabilities before they become critical issues. Looking forward to seeing more about Bubobot’s solutions in this space!

  2. 1

    I've had success with similar approaches. It's great to see a focus on both internal and external monitoring for uptime. Reminds me of my old job when we had to troubleshoot downtime issues constantly - good times!

Trending on Indie Hackers
I spent $0 on marketing and got 1,200 website visitors - Here's my exact playbook User Avatar 58 comments Veo 3.1 vs Sora 2: AI Video Generation in 2025 🎬🤖 User Avatar 28 comments Codenhack Beta — Full Access + Referral User Avatar 21 comments I built eSIMKitStore — helping travelers stay online with instant QR-based eSIMs 🌍 User Avatar 20 comments 🚀 Get Your Brand Featured on FaceSeek User Avatar 18 comments Day 6 - Slow days as a solo founder User Avatar 16 comments