3
2 Comments

Would biomedical research be easier if all your tools worked from a single prompt?

been wondering something for a while:

why do biomedical researchers still need 10+ tools, tabs and pipelines just to run one analysis?

Literature search in one place, pathway tools somewhere else, variant interpretation on another site… and you lose context every step.

So today we launched the SciSpace BioMed Agent, our attempt to fix that fragmentation: https://www.producthunt.com/posts/scispace-biomed-agent

It’s a domain-native AI agent that connects 150+ bio tools + 100+ scientific databases and can handle things like multi-omics analysis, variant interpretation, CRISPR/cloning workflows, and protocol troubleshooting… all from one interface.

We’d love feedback from this community: does an integrated “AI co-scientist” actually solve a real pain point for you, or are we missing something?

on December 8, 2025
  1. 1

    This looks incredibly useful! Bringing 150+ tools and databases into one AI-driven interface is a huge step toward reducing fragmentation in biomedical research. A unified ‘AI co-scientist’ could definitely streamline workflows and save time. Excited to see how this evolves.

Trending on Indie Hackers
I built a text-to-video AI in 30 days. User Avatar 69 comments What 300 Builders Taught Us at BTS About the Future of App Building User Avatar 52 comments From a personal problem to a $1K MRR SaaS tool User Avatar 47 comments This Week in AI: The Gap Is Getting Clearer User Avatar 37 comments How An Accident Turned Into A Product We’re Launching Today User Avatar 29 comments 🚀 From Frustration to Foundation: The Indie Hacker Story Behind Building aDirectory User Avatar 22 comments