Would you pilot a link-based traffic splitter for safer rollouts?
I'm building Klinky for founders who want to test a new landing page, workflow, checkout, or offer without replacing what already works.
Klinky gives you one link and routes a chosen percentage of visitors to two destinations. You can start 90/10 or 80/20, keep the stable path live, and review click volume and downstream signals in your own analytics or CRM.
It is free while early and intentionally simple: no automatic winner claims or fake conversion lift.
Would you use this for a landing page, no-code workflow, or offer test? I'm looking for a few teams to try it and tell me where the split-link approach is most useful → https://klinky.io
The low-risk split is clear, but have teams actually used Klinky for a live test and made a decision from the downstream data, or is getting them to trust a link-based experiment still the hurdle?
The 90/10 starting point feels like a good guardrail for testing without replacing a working path. Curious what downstream signal you’ve found most useful for deciding whether to widen the rollout beyond clicks.