As developers and indie hackers, we tend to underestimate prompts at first. They look like “just text”. But the moment an AI feature becomes part of a real product, prompts stop being experiments and start behaving like logic.
Here are a few high-impact principles and practical tips that consistently lead to better prompts.
One of the most common mistakes is assuming the model will infer intent.
Bad:
“Summarize this.”
Better:
“You are a technical writer. Summarize this article for a developer audience in under 150 words, focusing on trade-offs.”
Role + audience + constraints dramatically reduce ambiguity.
Good prompts don’t just describe what you want — they define how the answer should look.
Useful constraints include:
This turns AI from a creative guesser into a predictable system.
Tiny wording changes can lead to surprisingly different outputs.
That means:
At this point, prompts are no longer inputs — they are assets.
Code has Git.
Design has Figma.
Prompts need something similar.
(This is where tools like Lumra quietly start to matter — but more on that later.)
If your prompt mixes:
…you’ll eventually lose control.
A simple pattern:
This structure scales far better as your app grows.
The best prompt is rarely the most “clever” one.
It’s the one that:
Especially in production, boring and stable beats impressive and fragile.
Once you have:
You start asking new questions:
This is the exact pain point Lumra is built around.
Lumra is a prompt management platform designed for developers who treat prompts as part of their product, not copy-paste text.
With Lumra, you can:
If prompts are already shaping your UX, your logic, and your product outcomes, managing them ad-hoc doesn’t scale.
Just like we didn’t stop at raw code files before Git — we won’t stop at raw prompt text either.
Prompts are becoming infrastructure.
And infrastructure deserves proper tooling.