Recently, I've started writing again. And each piece has averaged ~2,000 characters. No one wants to read that.
In electrical engineering school, students spend significant time on circuit logic optimization lessons. It helps them design smaller, cheaper, and more energy-efficient circuits.
Similarly, I want to write more brain energy-efficient posts. But I wonder whether there are ways to optimize words as rigorously as that. So, here are some clues on possible ways as I brainstorm them for myself.
Note: this piece concerns condensed writing and not proper writing skills.
We observe two problems, which are named arbitrarily here.
Twin Statements: two or more immediate sentences or fragments that contain mutually-inclusive factors.
Redundancy: extra words, even where a perfectly-good set could be changed to less (ex: "so much" to "such").
(24 words. 143 chars. Long.)
"Some of you have an attractive writing style that keeps the reader's attention. And changing it might make them less attracted to your writing."
(16 words. 95 chars. Short.)
"For some of you, changing your attractive writing style might make readers less attracted to it."
(13 words. 79 chars. Shorter.)
"Some of you have an attractive writing style that keeps the reader's attention."
The two sentences have a common factor: the reader is attracted to the writing style. The thing that changes is the negation. So this provides an opportunity to merge the two or drop one.
(16 words. 81 chars. Long.)
"So this piece is not for you, because it's not going to give you anything useful."
(11 words. 55 chars. Short.)
"So this piece is not going to give you anything useful."
(7 words. 29 chars. Shorter.)
"So this piece is not for you."
It says the same thing in two fragments, especially when the piece is not for you. Yet it'll keep you around for another 7+ words.
(6 words. 36 chars. Long.)
"I've gotten back into writing again."
(5 words. 30 chars. Short.)
"I've gotten back into writing."
"Gotten back into" already includes "again."
(4 words. 27 chars. Shorter.)
"I've started writing again."
"Gotten back into..." -> "Started... again."
(11 words. 65 chars. Long.)
"And every thing that I've written has averaged ~2,000 characters."
(8 words. 46 chars. Short.)
"And each piece has averaged ~2,000 characters."
"Thing that I've written" -> "Piece"
The previous sentence provides enough info for the reader to know the subject.
"Every" -> "Each"
Decrease char count and repetition of words throughout the piece.
(10 words. 44 chars. Long.)
"So I checked to see what might be the cause."
(8 words. 37 chars. Short.)
"So I checked what might be the cause."
"Checked" includes "to see."
(13 words. 70 chars. Long.)
"I have never in my entire life written with so much redundancy before."
(8 words. 45 chars. Short.)
"I have never written with so much redundancy."
"Never" includes "my entire life" and "before."
(7 words. 42 chars. Shorter.)
"I have never written with such redundancy."
"So much" -> "Such"
(9 words. 44 chars. Long.)
"And every single word that I take out helps."
(8 words. 37 chars. Short.)
"And every word that I take out helps."
"Every" includes "single."
(7 words. 35 chars. Shorter.)
"And every word that I remove helps."
"Take out" -> "Remove"
From the twin statement cases, the short and shorter versions reduce the long one to ~61% and ~46%, respectively.
And from the redundancy cases, the short and shorter versions reduce to ~75% and ~71%, respectively.
I wish there was an app that did this for me, given how much time it wastes. That would've been extremely useful in this phase of my work. Even more if it included diff stats, so that I could decide whether it's worth removing personality in favor of a greener post.
An app like Grammarly is stuck with the constraints of proper grammar. On the other hand, this app would be focused on simplification instead.
What do you think? Would you use an app like that?
If you have any comments or suggestions, please share them below.
Writing more concisely takes time, so an app like this would be valuable.
I use Grammarly for emails and such, and the Hemingway App to help with clarity. It would be cool to have all the tools in one place.
I see what you mean. After reading your comment, I looked at the Hemingway App. And it observes the same problems. But it doesn't offer to fix them.
Grammarly is kind of like a remote keylogger, especially on desktop. It does have some useful features, but do the benefits outweigh the potential costs?
I've recently come across essay.app, which has an interesting feature that splits all sentences in a paragraph into individual sentences so a writer can focus on each particular sentence. I've played with it only a little so far and find it very writer-friendly.
I can see the app you are describing doing something similar, like Hemingway giving each sentence a readability rating and Grammarly giving each sentence a tone rating. I'm not sure how brevity would fit in, but it sounds like you understand that one.
The last step, which I imagine would be the most difficult, would be to provide different versions of each sentence for the different readability ratings, tone, and brevity one might be looking for.
All the writer has to do is mix and match the selections.
That sounds like it. And maybe without text formatting or other unrelated features. (Just font size options for starters.)
It'll have to tokenize the text and seriously analyze it, which would likely still result in a limitation of pattern matching to some 100 known brevity solutions. And if the user pays a premium, then they gain access to a "growing list of 500+ brevity solutions." Or something like that. (Better brevity.)
Target audience might especially be anyone who responds to comments often, like:
Possible name: Brevitize. Tilder?
'Cause users might even plug my super long comments in to get the main idea of what I'm trying to say without reading the actual comment.
And thanks for sharing essay.app, because their unique features exist in my company's note-taking app as well (e.g. inline sentence-versioning). Now I can try to observe for market proof.
Splitting the sentences is a great idea. I have a text splitter and joiner feature, but the user specifies the delimiter(s), as needed. Thereafter, the split pieces can be dragged above/below each other.
If it adds the simple option to split without removing the delimiting character, then it can be used as a sentence splitter. You get credit for that one. ;)
Thanks for the cred. I'm interested in how inline sentence-versioning can be UX'd. I love the name BTW, so I googled it and "mind blown." There goes today... ha
@IndyDevDan, that's how we know we've got yet another awesome developer aboard!
Btw, I just saw your post for Journal Ease. It's looking really good! Has a cozy feel to it.
But yes, at first, it seems like an extreme UX problem to solve, especially because there's no example of it to find anywhere; however, it turns out to be super simple.
Talking about UI/UX on a forum like this has reminded me of my poor ole deprived and dusty Ghost blog, where I sometimes discuss such things among others.
https://hello-cerebellum.ghost.io/inline-sentence-versioning/
Note: I had partly intended the blog for this sort of situation, so that things like concept descriptions or argument perspectives could be easily re-usable for other discussions. (I figure you might find this to be an interesting fact, given your niche. Like, maybe I don't want to share the entire blog in some places, right? Just the post that would always be accessible from some randomly-generated URL, as long as it stays up.)
"A cozy feel" I like that! Thanks
This is a completely new topic for me and I am blown away by the idea of it. Journal-ease.com is more focused on stream-of-consciousness writing as editing isn't really part of this model.
However, I will be thinking about and looking for more useful tools like this going forward. I plan to write more about my product adventure here at IH. Let's just say I'm cutting my writing teeth.
It's outside of my company's niche, too — which I've already taken way out of boundary as is. But hopefully, someone will develop this thing.
I'd pay to make things easier for the poor souls who read my comments. lol
Will be keeping an eye out for your posts.
Interesting idea.
My concern is that shorter content negatively impacts SEO.
Oh, it does? Good to know. I guess people still read these days.
In addition to blogs and other types of content, I find myself writing extremely long responses to people's posts. I also had that in mind as one of the primary problems.
I see it a lot on reddit and other places. So I'm not the only one.