2
2 Comments

Your marketing problem might be a product problem

I keep seeing founders treat distribution as a separate problem that begins after the product is built.

The questions usually sound like this: Which channel should I try? Should I do outbound? Post more? Invest in SEO?

Sometimes the answer really is a better channel. But sometimes the distribution problem began when the product was defined.

The founder knows the solution extremely well, but cannot describe what was happening in the customer's workflow immediately before the customer started looking for help.

That missing context makes every part of marketing vague. You do not know where the person will be, what language they use, when the problem becomes urgent or which outcome matters enough to make them act.

Before looking for more customers, I would reconstruct how the existing ones happened:

  1. What was happening when they started looking?
  2. What had they already tried?
  3. Why was the old way no longer acceptable?
  4. Why did they act then instead of one month earlier?
  5. What outcome were they actually trying to achieve?

This is not only copy research. The answers can change the product.

You may discover that customers value one narrow outcome while the roadmap is focused somewhere else. You may find that urgency exists only in a specific situation, or that the people you are targeting are not the people who experience the problem most often.

No amount of channel optimization fixes a product designed around the wrong situation.

That does not mean every acquisition problem is a product problem. The distinction is whether your current customers describe a repeated trigger, a meaningful outcome and a reason they chose to act.

If you cannot find that pattern, more traffic may only create more confusion.

When you look at your last customer, what happened immediately before they decided to try your product?

on August 17, 2026
  1. 1

    This hits close to home. I’ve been learning that more outreach doesn’t fix an offer people don’t clearly value.

    One of our first real users liked the product and execution, but pricing was the hesitation. That feedback pushed me to rethink the offer, make services more flexible, and build a startup program instead of just trying to send more traffic into the same funnel.

    Sometimes the useful signal isn’t “which channel should I try next?” It’s “what is stopping the people already interested from buying?”

  2. 1

    The distinction between an acquisition problem and a product-definition problem is useful. The last-customer question is probably where that distinction becomes visible.

Trending on Indie Hackers
I built a launch coach after my own product launch got 11 upvotes and 3 signups User Avatar 87 comments Most directories forget you exist after you list. We're trying something different. User Avatar 34 comments Built TermsGuard to explain contracts in plain English — looking for feedback User Avatar 27 comments Solo → Pre-Seed: The Tool Stack Decision That Will Either Save or Sink Your First 18 Months User Avatar 26 comments Update: clawed back from ~3-4K to ~8-9K daily clicks after the May Google core update — here's what actually worked User Avatar 22 comments I told a founder to get listed on the review sites. Her report showed AI was citing her competitors' homepages. User Avatar 19 comments