20
86 Comments

Zero paid users. Here's what I'm doing to find the first ones.

I built an AI meal planner called MealThinker. You talk to it like a person. It knows your kitchen, tracks what's expiring, plans your meals, logs nutrition, saves recipes, and handles your shopping list.

Live on web and iOS. Built it as a solo founder. Zero paid users so far.

Here's what I've tried:

  • Emailed my food blog newsletter (2,000 subs). 13% open rate. 6 clicks. Ouch.
  • Launched on Product Hunt today. Crickets so far.
  • Submitted to a bunch of product directories.
  • Started posting on social media. Fresh accounts with no followers so it feels like yelling into the void.

The building part was fun. The "get people to actually use it" part is a different beast.

Anyone else in this stage? What actually worked for you to get your first paying customers?

on January 28, 2026
  1. 3

    I’ve been in this exact stage and it’s honestly the hardest part. Building feels productive, but distribution feels invisible at first. What helped me was talking directly to a few real users 1-on-1 instead of trying to reach everyone at once. Even 5–10 active users can teach more than 1,000 impressions. Zero paid users doesn’t mean zero value — it usually just means the right people haven’t seen it yet. Keep shipping and keep conversations going.

  2. 3

    The 6 clicks from 2k subs is actually useful data - it tells you the email list isn't the right channel. Those subscribers signed up for food blog content, not SaaS products. Different intent entirely.

    What I've seen work at zero-to-first-paid: find where people are actively complaining about the problem RIGHT NOW. Reddit threads asking "how do I stop wasting groceries" or "meal planning apps that actually work". Quora questions. Facebook groups for meal prep. Those people have raised their hand and said "I have this problem today".

    PH and directories are visibility plays - they get you in front of people browsing, not people searching. First paid customers almost always come from finding people mid-frustration.

    1. 1

      the email list insight makes sense. they signed up for recipes not software. different intent like you said.

      I've tried Reddit a few times but posts keep getting auto-deleted. haven't cracked that yet. Facebook groups and Quora are worth trying. finding people mid-frustration instead of just broadcasting makes sense!

      thanks for this.

    2. 1

      I'm still figuring out this wonky UI (thought I was 'liking' the comment but then it disappeared), but I hope I'm responding to the correct comment that mentioned sending out 50 cold emails a day. This is a great idea and I'll start doing it today. Thank you.

  3. 2

    @JustinBuilds , replying to your last note about weak transition:

    Totally get that feeling and you’re right, adding more text isn’t the fix here.

    Looking at the page, the real gap isn’t clarity, it’s contrast.
    Right before “How it works,” the reader still hasn’t been told why every other solution quietly fails.

    Most meal planners break not because they’re bad ideas, but because they assume:
    – your pantry stays updated
    – your schedule is predictable
    – you’ll re-enter context every day

    A short bridge that calls that out can make “How it works” feel like the resolution, not the explanation.

    For example, something along the lines of:
    “Most meal planners work great… until real life happens.
    They forget what’s in your fridge, reset every week, and slowly turn into another app you stop opening.”

    That sets up your steps as why this one doesn’t fall apart, instead of just how it functions.

    If you want, I’m happy to do a tighter pass just on that transition so the flow feels inevitable rather than informational.

    1. 1

      Made a bunch of changes yesterday based on your earlier feedback, so the page looks different now than when you last saw it.

      But you're right, the comparison content ("why not just use a regular AI") is still positioned after "How it works" instead of before it. That bridge you're describing would set up the contrast first.

      Yeah, I'd take that pass if you're offering. Thank you again!

      1. 2

        I took a fresh pass on the page and honestly, this is a big step up. The opening is strong, the pain is relatable, and the pricing framing (“$0.50/day”) is doing real work.

        One thing that stands out now that the page is tighter: the transition into “How it works” is clear, but it could feel more inevitable. Right now it explains the product; it doesn’t fully resolve the frustration you set up.

        You already hint at this with the takeout line, but I’d consider adding a short bridge right before “How it works” that reframes the real failure mode:

        Most meal planners don’t fail because of recipes.
        They fail because they assume you’ll re-enter context every day like
        what you bought, what you ate, what you’re tired of, what’s about to expire.

        MealThinker works because it remembers, adapts, and plans with real life — not an ideal week.

        Then “How it works” becomes the answer to why this doesn’t fall apart, not just the mechanics.

        Small thing, but high leverage:
        I’d also consider moving “Why not just use a regular AI?” slightly up (or teasing it with a one-liner above the fold). That objection is strong, and you don’t want skimmers to miss it.

        Totally optional side note since we’ve already gone back and forth a few times: I’ve been helping a few founders do these full-page positioning + flow passes more intentionally (hero -> contrast -> objections -> pricing). If you ever want me to do a full end-to-end sweep on MealThinker, happy to help — no pressure at all.

        Either way, this is shaping up really nicely. The core idea is solid; now it’s just about tightening the story so it pulls people forward without friction.

        1. 1

          Really appreciate the detailed pass. I think you're right about the bridge before "How it works." I followed your advice and moved the "Why not just use a regular AI?" section up and added a short transition above it. The flow now goes: pain points, why other solutions fail, then how MealThinker is different, then the mechanics.

          Still tweaking, but it already feels like a stronger pull through the page. Thanks for pushing on the structure. Super helpful!

          1. 2

            Glad to hear the changes are already improving the pull and that’s usually the hardest part to get right.

            Since we’ve gone back and forth a few times now and you’ve been implementing consistently, I should probably say this directly instead of dancing around it:

            I do this as a service for a small number of founders, full-page positioning and flow passes focused on tightening the story from hero --> objections --> pricing --> close.

            If it’s helpful, I’d be happy to do a proper end-to-end sweep of MealThinker and leave you with concrete, ready to implement recommendations. No pressure at all if you’d rather keep iterating solo and just wanted to make it explicit.

            Either way, I’ve enjoyed digging into this with you. The product deserves a clear story.

            1. 1

              Thank you, you've been a big help! feel free to send me an email (you can find the contact page on the site).
              I don't think i'm ready to spend on consultation right now but I might change my mind later, and if I do, I'll get in touch via email!

              1. 1

                Totally understand and appreciate the honesty.
                Glad the feedback was useful, and best of luck pushing Meal Thinker forward 🙌
                I’ll send a short email so you have my details handy.
                If you ever want a second set of eyes on the funnel when things move faster, happy to help.

  4. 2

    Solid advice in the comments—narrowing down to one killer problem for a specific audience is gold. I'm in the same boat with my AI toolkit for indie hackers (FounderHub), bootstrapping as a dadypreneur (diapers by day, code by night). I overbuilt mine too, thinking "more features = more users," but crickets until I started cold DMing people venting about marketing overload on X and Reddit. Got my first feedback loop that way, which led to tweaks and a couple sign-ups.

    For MealThinker, maybe target busy parents in Facebook groups complaining about dinner chaos—offer a quick, no-strings demo via DM. It's unscalable at first, but those convos build real trust. Hang in there, Justin; that first paid user feels like winning the lottery. DM me if you want to swap war stories! 🚀

    1. 1

      Cold DMing is something I keep hearing but haven't actually done yet. I've mostly just been posting on social and making videos. Haven't cracked Reddit (my posts keep getting blocked) or Facebook groups yet.
      But you're right, parent groups might be the move since "what's for dinner" stress hits hardest when you're also wrangling kids.

      Appreciate the encouragement. That first paid user does feel like it'll be a lottery win at this point.

  5. 2

    Been through this exact phase with a dev tool I'm working on. The hardest lesson for me was realizing that "shipping" isn't the finish line — it's barely the starting gun.

    One thing that shifted my thinking: instead of asking "how do I get users," I started asking "where are people already frustrated about this problem TODAY?" That reframe changed everything. Stopped broadcasting, started listening.

    For meal planning specifically, I'd look at where people are already complaining about the problem in real-time — food waste threads, busy parent groups, fitness communities tracking macros. Those folks already feel the pain. They're not browsing Product Hunt looking for solutions, they're venting in niche communities.

    The first 10 customers rarely come from launches. They come from being genuinely helpful in the right place at the right time. Keep going — the building was the warm-up.

    1. 1

      "Shipping isn't the finish line, it's barely the starting gun." Yeah, that is spot on. I definitely had a moment after launching where I thought the hard part was over. Turns out that was the easy part.

      The reframe from "how do I get users" to "where are people already frustrated" is good. I've been mostly broadcasting (social posts, videos) instead of actually going to where the frustration is happening.
      Need to flip that.

      Appreciate the specific callouts too. Food waste threads and macro tracking communities aren't ones I'd thought of.

  6. 2

    Hey Justin — totally feel this. I’m in a similar stage with my own product, and getting from “built” to “paid users” really is a different beast.

    One thing that helped me get my first paying customer was setting up a consistent social media posting system. I started sharing small updates, category explainers, and behind-the-scenes posts across a few platforms daily. No ads, no growth hacks — just steady visibility.

    It took a little time, but that consistency slowly built awareness and eventually brought in the first customer without spending anything. Nothing explosive, but it broke the zero-customer barrier and created momentum.

    Curious to see what works for you next — keep sharing the journey.

    1. 1

      Appreciate that. I've started doing the consistent posting thing, but it's early. No paying customers yet but it does feel like the right long-term play. Just hard to know if it's working until suddenly it does.

      How long were you posting before you got that first customer?

  7. 2

    Your app feels like the kind of tool busy people who still care about eating well would want (if they didn’t care about healthy eating, they probably wouldn’t cook at all).
    Have you tried finding early users in communities where health and meal planning already matter? Like fitness groups, nutrition forums, or busy parent groups (especially mothers who often juggle meal planning). People in those areas are actively thinking about meals and might be more willing to try something that saves them time. There are also lots of social media influencers in these areas.

    1. 1

      Busy parents is a good angle I hadn't thought about. They're probably making the "what's for dinner" decision 5 times a week minimum. Worth exploring.

      Influencer outreach is scary but you're probably right. Did you have luck with that or is it general advice?

      1. 1

        General advice, haven't actually tried it myself yet(I'm pre-launch and in a completely different space). However, I think in this particular category of health/nutrition/parenting/etc, influencers work very well (not to mention how many of them there are, so a lot of opportunity).

  8. 2

    The shift from building to selling is exactly where the 'Inferno' begins. With a 0.3% CTR on your newsletter, the message isn't landing, not because the tool is bad, but because it’s likely too broad. For the first 10 paid users, stop yelling into the void of social media and go 'hand-to-hand.' Find a specific community (e.g., people on a specific keto diet or busy parents in a subreddit) and solve one urgent meal problem for them manually using your AI. General AI meal planners are a hard sell; a 'Time-saver for exhausted CrossFitters' is a product. Have you tried narrowing down your target persona to just one hyper-specific group?

    1. 1

      Genuine question. How do you actually do hand-to-hand without getting banned or ignored?

      Reddit deletes anything that smells like self-promotion. DMs feel spammy and could get my account flagged. Replying to people who aren't asking for help feels intrusive.

      The advice makes sense in theory. In practice it feels like walking a tightrope. What does hand-to-hand actually look like for you?

      1. 2

        Great question, Justin. The 'tightrope' feeling comes from trying to sell instead of trying to learn.

        In Startup Inferno, I talk about a framework called 'The Resident Consultant' approach. Here is how you do hand-to-hand without the spam:

        • Stop the Link-Dropping: never post your URL in the first contact. It’s the digital equivalent of shouting in a library.

        • The 3-Step DM: instead of a pitch, try this: 'Hey, I saw your post about [Problem X]. I’m actually building something to solve that specifically, but I’m stuck on [Feature Y]. As someone facing this, would you mind if I asked you 2 quick questions? No pitch, just need a reality check.'

        • Be the Expert, not the Salesman: on Reddit, don't talk about your tool. Talk about the problem. If you provide 90% of the solution in a comment, people will naturally click your profile to find the other 10%.

        'Hand-to-hand' isn't about closing a deal; it’s about Circle 3 (Gluttony of Information), gathering so much raw feedback that the product eventually sells itself.

        It feels intrusive only when you are taking value. If you are asking for advice or providing insights, you are giving value. Which part of your outreach feels most 'spammy' to you right now?

        1. 1

          That's super helpful. The idea that people will naturally click your profile if you give 90% of the answer in a comment is something I hadn't thought about. Makes the whole thing feel way less forced.
          Appreciate the breakdown.

  9. 2

    I understand how you feel , I too am in this stage of my journey, it can be discouraging but keep at it I believe we would pull through

    1. 1

      Appreciate it. Good luck with yours too. The building was the easy part apparently.

  10. 2

    Hey Justin, this stage is painfully familiar.

    What you’re describing usually isn’t a marketing failed problem, it’s a “the product does too many things for too many people” problem.

    MealThinker is powerful, but right now it’s talking like a feature list when early users need to feel one sharp “this fixes my daily frustration” moment.

    This is actually where I help founders the most.

    narrow MealThinker down to one painfully clear promise for one type of user, translate what you built into a language that sounds like how users complain about the problem and turn your founder story and early experiments into content that pulls the right people in, instead of broadcasting to everyone

    Usually that looks like:

    1. tightening the homepage and onboarding around a single use case

    2. shaping 2–3 core content angles that attract specific people already frustrated with meal planning

    3. helping you get your first paying users through clarity and conversations, not ads or hacks

    If you’re open to it, I’d love to take a quick look at your landing page or onboarding and give you a content strategist perspective on what might be blocking early conversion.

    Either way, you’re not alone here.

    1. 1

      You're probably right about the "too many things" problem. I built what I wanted, not what solves one specific pain for one specific person.

      Feel free to check out mealthinker.com if you want. Open to hearing what stands out as unclear. No pressure either way.

  11. 2

    The exact same thing happened to me. Building was the fun part; getting real users was a completely different story. What eventually helped me, after a long time, was truly going back to the problem and asking myself what problem I was actually solving.

    Instead of just showing a product, I started talking to people who were experiencing that problem and trying to gather qualitative insights. That was my main takeaway from going through this.

    1. 1

      That's the part I'm realizing I skipped. Built it for myself, assumed others would want it too.

      What did those conversations look like for you? Cold outreach, or finding people already talking about the problem somewhere?

  12. 2

    Hey Justin! I'm literally in the exact same boat as you (well, I was until today). I just got my first 2 paying customers TODAY for my AI video generator, Keyvello - $38 MRR.

    Here's what worked for me:

    1. Launched on Product Hunt this morning (still live!)
    2. Shared my journey authentically on Twitter/X - people love the "solo founder building in public" vibe
    3. Posted demo videos in relevant Reddit communities (r/SideProject, r/startups) - but focused on being helpful, not salesy

    The Product Hunt launch was key. I didn't expect conversions so fast, but having that social proof and the "live" urgency actually drove people to try it AND upgrade.

    For your AI meal planner, have you tried AI-focused communities? There's huge interest in practical AI tools right now. Also, food/nutrition subreddits might love MealThinker if you frame it as solving a real problem (which it clearly does).

    The building part really IS more fun than the marketing grind. But that first paying customer hit different - you'll get there! Keep pushing.

    1. 1

      congrats on the first 2 paying customers. that's huge. $38 MRR is real validation.

      good call on AI-focused communities. hadn't thought about that angle. might resonate more than generic food subs.

      appreciate the encouragement. hoping to join the "first paying customer" club soon.

  13. 2

    Going through this exact phase right now with a dev tool I just launched. The "yelling into the void" feeling is real.

    What's clicking for me after reading through these comments + my own experiments: the platforms that feel scalable (launches, directories, social posts) rarely convert early. The things that feel unscalable (1:1 DMs, replying to people mid-frustration in niche communities) are where the first real signals come from.

    I've also noticed that Reddit's spam filters are brutal for new accounts. Got auto-removed multiple times before I could even test whether the audience was right. Discord communities have been warmer — people actually reply and give feedback there.

    The hardest mindset shift for me has been accepting that early traction isn't about reach. It's about finding 5-10 people who genuinely have the problem today and talking to them like humans, not leads.

    Still figuring it out, but this thread is gold. Saving it.

    1. 1

      good point about Discord. hadn't tried that yet. Reddit keeps auto-removing everything I post so that's been a dead end. might look for some Discord communities in the meal planning / fitness space.

      good luck with your dev tool. we're all figuring it out together.

  14. 2

    Same stage here. Same pain.
    I learned the hard way that Product Hunt + Hacker News don’t magically create users.
    Distribution is way harder than building 😅
    I liked to read the comments here to adapt our own strategy.

  15. 2

    Same boat here with a few projects. What I've learned from talking to other bootstrapped founders: the first 10 customers almost never come from launches or directories. They come from hanging out where your users already are and being genuinely helpful.

    For a meal planning app, I'd look at fitness/nutrition communities, busy parents groups, or people doing specific diets (keto, vegan, etc). These are people with a strong "why" behind meal planning.

    One thing that helped me: listening to how other indie founders cracked this. The French podcast "Public SaaS Builders" has some great episodes on early traction tactics from bootstrapped founders. Worth checking out if you understand French or use auto-translate.

    Keep shipping and talking to users. The first paying customer always feels impossible until it happens 💪

    1. 1

      "the first 10 customers almost never come from launches or directories" - hearing this from multiple people now. message received.

      good point about specific diets. I'm vegan so that might be a natural starting point. people with a strong "why" like you said.

      thanks for the podcast recommendation. will check it out.

  16. 2

    I was in almost the exact spot on my last project. Build went well, launch did nothing, and I realised most of what I was doing was broadcast.

    The first paying users didn’t come from Product Hunt, directories or social posts. They came from a handful of 1:1 conversations with people who already felt the problem strongly. I’d reach out after seeing them talk about the issue somewhere, ask how they were handling it today, and just listen. When someone was clearly frustrated and already hacking together a workaround, showing them the product felt like help, not a pitch. Those were the people who converted.

    Another big one for me was tightening the promise. When I talked about what the product did, people were interested. When I talked about one specific outcome in their day that would get easier, people were willing to try it. Same product, different framing.

    It was slower than I wanted, but those early conversations shaped the positioning and onboarding way more than any launch ever did.

    1. 1

      "when I talked about one specific outcome in their day that would get easier, people were willing to try it" - that's a good reframe. same product, different framing.

      this thread has been a consistent message: 1:1 convos over broadcast. taking the hint.

  17. 2

    Maybe your existing audience usually isn’t your customer. A newsletter audience might like your content or your story, but that doesn’t mean they feel the problem strongly enough to pay for a solution. So low clicks don’t automatically mean MealThinker is bad.

    Even after building, validation still matters. The people you talk to while figuring out the problem often end up becoming your first actual users. That early feedback loop matters way more than launches or directories.

    Also, this doesn’t really feel like a Product Hunt kind of product. It feels more like a habit tool. Those usually start by being insanely useful for one very specific type of person, not “anyone who eats food”. Therefore, distribution is where you'll win.

    Building is the fun part. Getting people to care is slow, awkward, and way less glamorous.

    1. 2

      This is very well said.

    2. 1

      "this doesn't really feel like a Product Hunt kind of product. It feels more like a habit tool" - hadn't thought about it that way but you're right. it's not a shiny launch moment thing, it's a daily use thing.

      the "one very specific type of person" point is good too. I've been thinking too broadly. need to narrow down. Thank you!

  18. 2

    Wow, a 2k user food blog base is a huge leg up. Could you use your influence there to secure a partnership? Maybe a brand that reaches out to you for promotion on your blog

    1. 1

      interesting idea. haven't thought about partnerships that way. the newsletter is more recipe-focused so the overlap with "pay for an app" might be small. but worth exploring. thanks for the suggestion.

  19. 2

    The newsletter open rate isn't the problem — 13% is solid. The issue is likely audience-product fit. Food blog readers want recipes, not necessarily an AI to plan their meals.

    What worked for me: Instead of broadcasting to a list, I found 5-10 people actively complaining about the specific problem on Reddit/Twitter and DMed them directly. "Hey, saw your post about X — I built something that might help. Would you try it for free and give me honest feedback?"

    Those 1:1 conversations converted way better than any launch blast. Plus the feedback shaped the product.

    For meal planning specifically, I'd look at r/mealprep, r/EatCheapAndHealthy, or Facebook groups for busy parents. Find the people already manually solving the problem you're automating.

    The first 10 users almost never come from marketing. They come from conversations.

    1. 1

      this is helpful. you're right that the newsletter audience wants recipes not apps. different intent.

      the 1:1 DM approach makes sense. I've had trouble posting on Reddit (everything gets auto-deleted) but hadn't thought about just DMing people who are already complaining about the problem. going to try that.

      appreciate the specific subreddit suggestions too.

  20. 2

    How long has the product been out for? Success won't happen overnight. Spend a bit more time doing SEO & ASO, it'll help drive more and more traffic to your product. Don't overlook the effectiveness of localisation too.

    Add your product to directories over the course of weeks/months, and be consistent with posting on social media, if only a few posts in a day.

    Reach out to journalists and tell them about your product. Do the same with podcasters and see if you can get interviews in order to explain what your app is about and what problem it solves, about what your product does better than X or Y.

    Reddit is also a great place to post. Find subreddits and people in general that need your product and reach out to them personally, get feedback. If you already have 2,000 potential interested users, post again to them and offer them some free trial in order to get genuine feedback that you can use to craft your product.

    Also, it might be worth thinking about building in reverse in the future. Make a quick landing page and add an email 'waitlist' form and make a post on Twitter/X mentioning your upcoming product. If it gets traction, you have an early indicator that you're potentially onto something. It'll take you a day and you'll get quick feedback. Less time consuming than building a product you think is incredible but others may not.

    You'll find a lot of people are in the same boat. Don't become demotivated. Show up every day and little by little you'll get more exposure and more users.

    All the best,
    Andy.

    1. 2

      thanks Andy. been live about a week so still very early. good reminder to stay consistent and not expect overnight results. appreciate the encouragement.

  21. 2

    the "yelling into the void" part hits hard. been there.

    one thing i learned the hard way - distribution channels need to be warmed up BEFORE the product is ready. not after. building an audience while building the product is 10x harder than building the product itself.

    the 13% open rate on your newsletter is actually decent. the problem might be the list wasnt primed for this specific product. food blog readers might not be the same people who want an AI meal planner.

    what if you found 10 people who actively complain about meal planning in communities (reddit, fb groups, etc) and just... asked them if theyd try it? not a launch blast. just 1:1 convos.

    the first paying customers usually come from direct relationships, not broadcasts. at least thats what ive seen work.

    1. 1

      "distribution channels need to be warmed up BEFORE the product is ready" - yeah, learned that one the hard way too. building the audience and the product at the same time is brutal.

      hearing the same advice from multiple people here about 1:1 convos over broadcast. going to focus on that. thanks.

  22. 2

    I am on a similar path
    I built this tool called cvcomp. It is a resume scanners but has JD based scan feature and in built editor, and everyone who tried it really loved the product.
    As I am a solo marketer, I am running the Insta, Linkedin and YT, doing backlinks, preparing for product hunt launch and on other AI directories as well.
    I have got just 4 paid users after a week of launch. So yeah its tyring but exciting

    1. 1

      4 paid users puts you ahead of me. I'm still at zero. the solo marketer grind is real though. doing everything at once is exhausting. good luck with the Product Hunt launch!

  23. 2

    I’ve been in this exact spot. ~

    It’s rough — especially once the build high wears off and you’re left staring at reality.

    One thing that stood out to me: most of what you tried is broadcast. That usually works later, not when you’re trying to find the first few people willing to pay.

    What helped me early on was flipping the goal from “get users” to “find one specific person with a sharp pain.” Not growth — relief.

    A rough frame I use now:

    First users come from conversations, not launches

    They already have a workaround (spreadsheets, notes, pure chaos)

    Paying is less about features and more about trust + timing

    For something like this, I’d probably start with people already obsessed with food logistics — parents meal-prepping every week, people tracking macros, or folks actively trying to cut food waste. Narrow enough that the problem feels personal.

    One concrete thing that worked for me: reach out 1:1 and ask how they handle this today. Don’t pitch. If they start complaining, you’re close. If they shrug, move on fast.

    Also worth saying: zero paid users doesn’t mean zero value yet. Most of the time it just means the problem isn’t sharp enough for the audience you’re talking to.

    Curious — who do you imagine would be genuinely annoyed if this disappeared tomorrow?

    1. 1

      this is the advice I needed to hear. I've been in broadcast mode and wondering why nobody's listening. "find one specific person with a sharp pain" makes more sense than trying to reach everyone.

      to answer your question honestly, I'm not sure yet who would be annoyed if it disappeared. probably me. I use it every day. that's a sign I need to find more people like me and actually talk to them.

      appreciate the reframe.

  24. 2

    I'm currently going through this, spent months building an enterprise B2B app thinking I'll definitely get users but that wasn't the reality of it, marketing has become the hardest part

    1. 1

      same. building is the comfortable part. marketing feels like a completely different skill set. what's been working for you so far?

  25. 2

    это интересная стратегия и очень понятная

  26. 2

    The comments above nailed the distribution side - finding people mid-frustration and outcome-focused messaging. I want to add one more angle that might be the actual blocker.

    The gap between "6 clicks from 2k subs" and "zero paid users" suggests this isn't just a traffic problem. Even if you fix distribution, you might hit the same wall: people sign up, look around, and bounce.

    The question I'd ask: what's the shortest path from signup to feeling the value? With a meal planner, the magic moment isn't seeing the interface - it's getting tonight's dinner sorted in under 2 minutes without thinking.

    If your onboarding asks new users to manually input their kitchen inventory, dietary preferences, and meal history before they get their first plan, you're asking them to do homework before the demo. That's where activation dies.

    The pattern I've seen work: give them one high-value win immediately (even if it's generic), then progressively personalize as they use it. Example: "Here are 3 meals you can make with chicken, rice, and bell peppers. Got those? Great, here's tonight's plan." Then learn preferences from behavior, not forms.

    Once someone gets value in the first session, the free → paid conversation becomes about "do I want this every week?" instead of "do I trust this enough to even try it?"

    1. 1

      my thinking was if they invest a minute or two in onboarding, they're more likely to stick around and convert. sunk cost thing. but you might be right that they're bouncing before they ever see the value.

      I don't have data on where people drop off yet. that's probably the first thing to figure out before changing anything.

      appreciate the detailed feedback. gives me something concrete to dig into.

      1. 2

        This is such an overlooked point. I’ve seen this on the sales side too. When early users don’t hit a quick win, they don’t complain or give feedback, they just quietly disappear. Then founders think it’s a traffic problem when it’s actually an activation problem.

        The first paying users I’ve seen tend to convert after a very obvious “this just saved me effort” moment. If that moment is delayed, even strong interest fades fast.

        1. 1

          this is helpful, thanks. I think you're right that the "this just saved me effort" moment is what matters. need to make that obvious early. appreciate you taking the time.

  27. 2

    Thanks for posting, Justin. I'm at the stage just before product launch, and I'm kicking myself for starting the marketing efforts so late.

    I decided to take a UGC approach and, having no budget, decided to go 100% AI video and voice. I'm seeing much more engagement with video than my text/screenshot posts previously.

    I'm a long way from getting paying users from my efforts, but I'm in it for the long haul.

    Good luck!

    1. 2

      I just started doing video too. haven't seen much traction yet but feels more promising than text posts. what are you using for the AI voice? I've been messing with elevenlabs. good luck with your launch.

      1. 1

        Using grok imagine for video and Speechify (random) for voice gen.

  28. 2

    I’m in the building stage right now but that’s the part that feels scary. I’m starting to post while I build to start getting some eyes early on and hopefully make this step easier.

    1. 1

      smart to start posting now. I waited until after I built to start marketing and wish I'd done it earlier. you'll have an audience ready when you launch instead of starting from zero like I did.

  29. 2

    Cold-start is indeed very difficult. With one of my previous SaaS applications, by sending out 400 cold-start emails daily, I acquired 50 users in a week (but none were paid users). Later, I analyzed, and the problem might be: placing the CTA too low, which affected my conversion rate. However, I'm still experimenting.

    1. 2

      400 cold emails → 50 users in a week is a solid response rate.

      If none are paying yet, it’s probably less about the CTA in the email and more about what happens after they sign up i.e. onboarding, time-to-value, and whether the paid outcome is obvious early.

      With cold traffic especially, the email’s job is just to get the right people in; the product and onboarding usually do the real conversion work.

      1. 1

        You're right, my previous project was indeed rough in terms of user onboarding. It was my first project, and I overlooked this.

    2. 1

      50 users from cold email in a week is solid even if none paid yet. what were you using to send that volume? I haven't tried cold email yet.

      1. 2

        In fact, I built a cold email system that can automatically find me 1200+ target customers daily, and then at the right time, use an automatic script program + Gmail to acquire them.

        1. 1

          that's impressive. did you build the system yourself or use existing tools? curious what the reply rate looks like with that volume.

  30. 2

    2k → 6 clicks is a big signal. That usually means the email promise isn’t matching what people care about.
    What was the core outcome you emphasized in the email?

    1. 1

      The email focused on the "5pm staring at the fridge" problem and vegetables going bad. Then listed features: remembers your preferences, suggests meals from your pantry, plans a day or week.

      Looking at it now, it was pretty feature-heavy. Didn't really nail a specific outcome beyond "no more decision fatigue."

      What would you have led with?

      1. 2

        Yeah, I think your reflection is spot on. The email explains what the product does, but it doesn’t anchor the reader on one clear win.

        I’d probably lead with a single, concrete outcome and let everything else support that. For example:

        1. “Save 30 minutes every day deciding what to cook — using what’s already in your fridge.”

        2.“Stop wasting groceries. Plan meals automatically from what you already bought.”

        3.“Know exactly what you’re cooking tonight by 9am no 5pm fridge staring.”

        Once someone buys into one of those outcomes, the features make sense as proof, not the headline.

        1. 1

          This is really helpful, thank you.

          You're right - I was explaining what it does instead of selling the outcome.

          "Stop wasting groceries. Plan meals automatically from what you already bought."

          That one hits. Going to rewrite my landing page and next email around that.

          Appreciate the clarity.

          1. 2

            Love that direction.

            When you’ve updated the landing page or email, feel free to share it , I’m happy to skim it and point out anything that could improve clicks.

            1. 1

              actually took your advice and updated my landing page yesterday. headline is now outcome-focused instead of feature-heavy. would love your take on it if you have a sec! Thank you!
              mealthinker.com

              1. 2

                The page is clearer now, but the headline + opening are still a bit generic for cold visitors. Right now they describe what the product does, not the moment the reader is already in.

                For example, instead of:

                For home cooks who hate deciding what to make

                I’d test something more situational, like:

                Staring at your fridge at 7pm? Dinner just decided itself.

                That immediately tells the right person “this is for you.”

                I’d also slow down the opening copy slightly. It touches the pain, but moves on too fast. Pressurizing one specific moment before introducing the product can pull people in harder.

                Example direction:

                You’re tired.
                You’re hungry.
                You open the fridge and nothing clicks.

                MealThinker plans dinner using what you already have — so you don’t scroll recipes or waste another evening deciding.

                This works because cold visitors decide whether to stay in a few seconds. Meeting them inside a familiar situation builds instant resonance before features show up.

                If you want, I can do a deeper pass later (structure, CTAs, expectations), but tightening the first screen alone should improve engagement.

                1. 1

                  This is great feedback. Really appreciate you taking the time.

                  Just updated it with the "Staring at your fridge at 7pm?" angle and slowed down the opening like you suggested.

                  mealthinker.com

                  Interested to hear what you think.

                  1. 2

                    This is a clear improvement — the pain points feel real now, not rushed.

                    One thing I’m noticing at this stage is that right before “How it works,” the momentum drops a bit.

                    You’ve built good tension, but there isn’t a strong bridge yet that clearly answers:
                    “Why is this different from every other meal planner I’ve tried?”

                    If you want, I can do a focused pass on the hero + this transition section to tighten the emotional flow and set up “How it works” more convincingly.

                    Happy to keep it small and practical.

                    1. 1

                      Yeah, that'd be great. I've felt that transition is a bit weak but wasn't sure how to bridge it without just adding more text.

                      Would appreciate the focused pass.

                      Thanks you for all the help!

  31. 1

    Hey Justin!
    The newsletter thing makes sense in theory but I think the issue is you're broadcasting to people who signed up for food content — not people who are actively frustrated right now.

    I'm in a pretty similar spot (zero paying users on a validation tool I built). What actually shifted my thinking was going where people are mid-frustration instead of trying to redirect attention from somewhere else.

    I searched Reddit for people complaining about the exact problem my tool solves. Found 71 threads about freelancers struggling with invoicing. Sounds like a goldmine, right? Except zero of those 71 mentioned wanting to pay. They complain, grab a free tool, and move on.

    That 10-minute search saved me from building into a dead market. But when I found communities where people ARE spending money on the problem, the conversations were completely different.

    For MealThinker — I'd look at threads where someone says "I meal prep every Sunday and I'm running out of ideas" or "I spend 45 minutes deciding what to cook." That frustration-in-the-moment (not food blogs) is where your first paying user probably lives.

    Have you checked specific subreddits for people complaining about meal planning?

  32. 1

    this resonates. 14 active merchants on my shopify app, $0 MRR. built the product, launched on the app store, did the thing. installs come — people leave before they see value.

    biggest lesson so far: distribution and activation are coupled but activation comes first. if 4 out of 10 people who install leave the same day, spending more time on distribution just fills a leaky bucket faster.

    the "resident consultant" approach someone mentioned here is spot on. on reddit i just answer questions about shopify costs and margins — not pushing anything, just being helpful with stuff i genuinely know about from building the product. that kind of presence compounds way slower than a product hunt launch but the people who find you through it actually trust you.

    one thing that hit me: your 2k newsletter subscribers were interested in recipes, not SaaS. the intent mismatch is brutal. same energy as getting shopify store owners to install an app — they want to solve a problem, not try new software. the pitch has to start from their pain, not your feature list.

  33. 1

    The channel list you've tried is visibility plays — they get you in front of people browsing, not people mid-frustration.

    First paid customers almost always come from where people are actively complaining about the problem you solve. For meal planning:

    • Subreddits: r/MealPrepSunday (1.5M+), r/EatCheapAndHealthy, r/cookingforbeginners
    • Facebook Groups: Meal Prep + Budget Cooking groups tend to have very specific "ugh I'm so tired of planning" posts
    • YouTube comments: Under popular meal prep videos, people ask the same questions over and over

    The pattern: find someone mid-frustration, be genuinely helpful (not pitchy), and the first few will convert.

    Also — 2,000 blog subs is a real asset. The 13% open rate isn't bad, but 6 clicks means the CTA didn't land. What did the email actually say?

  34. 1

    I collected 450 places to promote a startup and get traffic and backlinks!!

    I know it’s very challenging for a new founder to generate traffic and conduct marketing for a new startup while also developing a product.

    Sometimes it can feel overwhelming and confusing.

    I’ve collected a list of websites that receive good traffic, where you can promote your product and get strong visibility and backlinks to help your site rank better.
    It’s not free because it takes a lot of time to research and compile.

    As a student and part-time founder, this helps me a lot.

    www.marketingpack.store

Trending on Indie Hackers
I'm a lawyer who launched an AI contract tool on Product Hunt today — here's what building it as a non-technical founder actually felt like User Avatar 142 comments “This contract looked normal - but could cost millions” User Avatar 54 comments A simple way to keep AI automations from making bad decisions User Avatar 47 comments 👉 The most expensive contract mistakes don’t feel risky User Avatar 41 comments The indie maker's dilemma: 2 months in, 700 downloads, and I'm stuck User Avatar 40 comments Never hire an SEO Agency for your Saas Startup User Avatar 37 comments