27
64 Comments

Zoom is the new Twitter

“Zoom calls are the new Twitter when it comes to early growth strategy”

I have always thought it was plain odd to use the likes of Twitter to push an early-stage startup brand. Why does a startup even need a brand when they have made zero sales. It is the wrong focus. Make some money, prove there is a market to make more. Your two-person idea to become the next Jeff Zuckerberg is a long way from needing a brand. It needs to survive the next 24 months and follows won't pay the hosting bill or convince an investor to stump up money.

I get that 40 years in IT with 25 of them as a startup founder puts me at the wrong end of the demographic for being allowed into the social media clubhouse (although, do not use the word old, please). However, I have seen tech and online services come and go a lot over the years, and the likes of Twitter has always felt to me like another that will soon sink back into the swamp whence it came.

But I have a new online startup (Venture Cards) and decided for this one I needed to try hard with Twitter. So in the past ten days, I gave it everything I had (I really did Mum, honestly). I wanted to figure out what I was missing and see if I should bother longer term.

Some will say ten days is not enough time to discover the possibilities.

But F^&king hell, my brain is frazzled. I feel ADDICTED. And why? All so I can show off my back story in the hope that anyone gives a shit. They don't.

So yesterday, I came off it for the sake of my mental health. Future business connections will view my About-Us page, and hopefully, that is enough to express what my startup idea and myself are about. If you need me to tweet about it before you take an interest, then move along please, there's nothing here for you!

So yes, I have an alternative growth plan that involves good old fashioned reaching out directly to my target clients, setting up Zoom calls and having a face to face chat about what I offer. Like many people in the pandemic, I've used Zoom a fair bit and can often have bursts of 30 Zoom calls per week, 25 minutes each, with a short break in-between, and still feel human at the end. Oh, and they have resulted in genuine relationship-building and actual business deals too.

Zoom calls haven't once left my head feeling like it is full of cotton wool or made me want to hide in a darkened room. Or had me wasting hours checking if I have one more stupid like or follower. Yes, if you must ask, I've added 100 followers and had dozens of likes. Whoopy.

Please do not fall for the I must have followers before I launch. Followers do not equal paying customers. Every second spent chasing Likes is a moment not driving clients. Only revenue can put food on the table. Twitter replies are just noise.

Whereas, a Zoom call is just the face to face communication we've been doing since we came out of the trees. It's natural. It's how human beings work and it's how business works.

[take a deep breath and relax 😊]

on February 24, 2022
  1. 11

    I personally haven't tried marketing on Twitter, it does seem like a good way to pollute your Twitter account though. I've checked out a few #BuildInPublic stars on Twitter and mostly didn't enjoy their tweets. It sort of disgusts me when someone only creates content with an agenda.

    1. 2

      i'm really glad I'm not the only one that feels the same way as you!

    2. 1

      I agree that if someone uses #buildinpublic with a singular goal to drive sales, it leads to bad content and can definitely feel slimy (many examples of this).

      I think a lot of people either pitch Twitter as a growth hack or a shortcut to marketing, but in reality it's wayyy more work than is worth it if you are just trying to "profit".

      The real reason to get on Twitter IMO is to meet cool people and make friends. People are really approachable on Twitter, I've made a lot of new friends just by engaging with the indie hacker Twitter community.

      Another reason I use Twitter is to get better at making content, I personally enjoy writing and I want to get better, Twitter is a great way to improve writing online (concise, to the point).

    3. 1

      ‘Disgusted’ hey. Wow, I guess it is that kind of reaction that is unhealthy and makes more and more of us feel that hanging around within 100 miles of social media is so toxic. You don’t want that feeling when you go about your day to day business. And I don’t want to wake in the morning to find something I might have been doing online makes people feel disgusted.

      But sorry, I must be missing something. What exactly do successful startup founders write on Twitter then? So many tell us how they need to grow a big following of fans before they launch. How do they do that without an agenda? Please tell, genuinely confused.

      1. 6

        Honestly. I agree with this person - the level of BS from many founders on Twitter has made me feel like Twitter should be a last resort for marketing for me.

        Generally, entrepreneurship influencers "building an audience" post the same generic motivational slogans again and again, retweet each other to get more engagement, and occasionally toss in an ad for their service. I don't really get anything out of following them, so I don't.

        1. 1

          Perfectly put Lucas. I've even read somewhere that there is an agreed ratio...

          1 pitch for your product then 15 bullshit likes & retweets. Wash and repeat... ad infinitum.

          'tis all a waste of a life.

  2. 6

    Hey Steve, respect your opinion and I can see where you're coming from.

    But I don't see Twitter and Zoom as competitors at all. I have gotten on plenty of Zoom calls with clients I've met on Twitter.

    Same way you described you do on LinkedIn.

    I am very active on Twitter, just wanted to share my reasons here:

    • As a solopreneur with no entrepreneurship background, Twitter is a place for me to find like minded people. Find friends and even collaborators. Nobody in my physical vicinity is an entrepreneur. Everyone on my LinkedIn is an employee, not an entrepreneur.

    Twitter and IndieHackers is where I meet other entrepreneurs.

    • I don't have the budget to run ads for my products and services. Not even to validate them. Twitter is the fastest way for me to get free eyeballs on them.

    • Twitter is also a place to study and understand how people really think. Organic posts on Twitter are not as flashy as Instagram, and not as fake as LinkedIn. They are more authentic. It gives me interesting problems I can solve and maybe build a product around.

    • I agree the likes don't matter. But I think the replies and the DMs do. And I've found tremendous value in Twitter because of that.

    • I don't use it primarily for marketing or branding, but I use it as a more functional version of LinkedIn. Or at least what LinkedIn was supposed to be.

    • I agree Zoom calls are exponentially more valuable than likes. But I don't see it's a valid comparison. For me Twitter is a way to find and get people on Zoom calls. It's top of the sales funnel. Much like LinkedIn is for you.

    I hope you will allow me to respectfully disagree with your thesis. I don't have as much experience as you, happy to be corrected 🙏

    Thanks
    Ayush

    1. 3

      Wholeheartedly agree. It doesn’t have to be one or the other, and especially as a solo founder I think it’s really important that you use whichever platform you enjoy for marketing. Forcing yourself to #buildinpublic when Twitter seems like useless junk to you is obviously counterproductive and is probably going to result in people being bothered by your robotic and boring tweets. And if you hate calls, maybe that’s just not the way for you. I could never do 8 hours of zoom calls every day for a week straight – that would certainly make me want to hide in a darkened room... And LinkedIn feels weird and forced to me, it’s too much like facebook for my taste. Twitter on the other hand – I’ve been using my personal twitter account for over 10 years now, simply because I like the platform and it’s fun for me, so it would be a really natural way of marketing for me as well.

      So I agree with Steve’s message that you don’t have to use Twitter just because it’s cool right now. But I disagree with "Zoom is the new Twitter". I’d say whichever channel you enjoy most to make meaningful connections with other people can be your "new Twitter" (including Twitter 😜).

      I’ve found clients on Reddit and Discord, simply because I enjoy talking to people on these platforms anyway. Nothing is better for marketing than simply being authentic and approachable.

      1. 1

        Yes, whatever feels authentic to each of us is very important, so I guess whatever works.

        I agree about robotic and boring tweets. So why is it that (and I am going to call him out here), Andrew at MicroAcquire tweets several of the most banal messages every day about startups, ongoing, forever. Many are clearly meant to provoke with viewpoints that don't always make sense. And the thing is, hundreds if not thousands of people retweet, reply or Like every single one of them!?

        That is what drives me nuts on Twitter. Banality followed by banality, ad infinitum.

        It means that genuine replies or posts that are trying to engage and create real conversation get flooded out. Basically there is no conversation, just lots of people shouting look at me, ... look at me.

        Whereas personally, on Linkedin I actually do find conversation.

        1. 2

          Very interesting. I don’t have a good answer for that – for me, it’s the opposite. Sometimes when I open up my LinkedIn Feed and see the generic attention-grabbing spam posts on there, I have to keep my eyes from rolling so hard I can see back into my own skull.
          I guess it depends a lot on the bubble you somehow end up in, regardless of the platform.

          (I agree about Andrew’s tweets btw, pretty generic marketing type tweets, wouldn’t enjoy those either. I guess there’s just some formulas on any platform that work and that get exploited by some, while others are successful by just acting natural, and still others try either of these things and nothing works at all.)

          TL;DR: Social media algorithms are weird. ¯\(ツ)

    2. 3

      Thank you Ayush, this is a fantastic response and has opened my eyes about Twitter and got me wondering if I am using it all wrong. Certainly I feel I, and many others, are using it the way Twitter want us to use it. But perhaps, like with Linkedin, we should be ignoring the social part and just using it to make connections and for 1-on-1 contacts. And as you say, as the top of the funnel to lead into the Zoom discovery calls.

      Firstly an aside though, I am not sure Twitter is also a place to study and understand how people really think. I think it is the most unnatural place in existence. People do not behave normally or authentically. Many posts simply creep me out.

      But putting that aside,... if I understand correctly about how you use Twitter, then, like I do on Linkedin (for new readers, see my other reply in this thread about how I use Linkedin), the main objective is to simply find great contacts and DM them.

      So with Linkedin I have a large and growing 1st level pool I can message directly. But I can also reach outside my network to 100 people every week with connection requests to introduce myself and my product (100 is a limit imposed by Linkedin). This works really well. And as long as I keep the messages non-spammy and relevant I get zero complaints. In fact out of 100 I send asking if we can connect and me send more info, I usually get 90% say yes.

      But I am not sure I get how this can work on Twitter when most people in my experience have closed off their DM's? Can you give us Twitter-doubters a mini-tutorial on the actual mechanics of how you would get into someone's DM's?

      1. 4

        A couple of things here.

        • I think Twitter does a very good job of creating filter bubbles. And each bubble looks very different from the other. So if you've spent time in "politics Twitter" or "sports Twitter" you will not see anything from "maker/founder/creator Twitter". And vice versa. That might be the reason why our perception of Twitter is so different.

        • A good way to switch bubbles is to heavily curate who you follow, who follows you, what you "like" and engage with on the platform. Do that for a few days and the algorithm will take it from there. Can also create separate Twitter accounts for separate bubbles. (I have a dummy account to catch up on politics and sports, and I don't talk about those topics on my main account ever.)

        • In my bubble, the most interesting people have their DMs open and want to build mutually enriching connections. It's only a matter of whether what I have to offer is of value to them or not.

        • The DM strategy is pretty much how you describe it. Just that your bio and your Tweet history need to be in sync with what you talk about in the DMs. Because that's the 1st thing people check when they get a cold DM.

        It's like a verification check, to figure out if the person is authentic or not, does he know what he's talking out, or is he just looking to scam me?

        if that's sorted then Twitter can lead to very fruitful connections.

        Hope this answers a few questions.

        1. 2

          Thanks Ayush, this is useful. I definitely see that keeping your startup tweets seperate is important.

          And yes I guess having the right Bio is key too. Given I am wanting to reach out to investors (to become members of my platform rather than for investment), how would you say my bio looks? https://twitter.com/SteveProcter

          From past quick observations I am not convinced many investors have DM's open. However, you have convinced me to keep looking at Twitter, albeit in a different light 😊

          So less to tweet, gather Likes and take part in the social game in order to make people follow me (thus opening their DM's). But more to find people who are already open so I can reach out directly, as I do on Linkedin.

          1. 3

            Hey Steve, your bio looks good. It can be better if you can add a bit about what topics you Tweet about.

            Thinking of your Twitter account as a TV channel, why should people tune into it? What kind of content will you deliver day to day?

            That should be clear from the bio + banner + pinned tweet.

            1. 2

              cool feedback, I've just updated them, hope you approve 😊

              1. 1

                Nice, much better now👍

  3. 3

    Great points @steveprocter

    I think it is as important as ever to strike a balance. Feeling "frazzled" or exhausted about the process is usually going to do more harm than good over the long term. Talking about yourself and your story repeatedly is a one way ticket to narcissism.

    That being said, I feel it is important to stay up to date on how clients and other people interact with each other. Social has proven that it isn't going anywhere and will continue to be a primary driver of communication.

    Ignoring the platforms altogether puts founders at a potential disadvantage. If you solve problems that nobody knows about, are you actually creating anything of value?

    Looking forward to hearing more tips and insights from your vast experience Steve.

    1. 3

      one way ticket to narcissism - I couldn't agree more. Psychologists must be having a field day studying social media usage, and us!

      Personally I think social will nosedive as a primary driver. There are just too many people beginning to see the dangers. And not just of the media itself, but the companies behind it all.

      You say If you solve problems that nobody knows about, are you actually creating anything of value. This seems to be implying that if it doesn't happen on social then it doesn't happen. Not sure I agree - there are plenty of other ways to get word out there.

  4. 3

    Interesting take, Steve! Love it. I think we could all use some more depth in our digital relationships. I could see this taking you further than the often superficial relationship of follower/author. Please keep us posted on how it goes. Cheers!

    1. 2

      Appreciate that, thanks Bob 😊 Would you mind emailing me (or linkedin) as I’d love to understand your thoughts a bit more.

  5. 2

    Zoom's growth was predictable due to COVID-19.
    All businesses needed an urgent way to communicate efficiently and Zoom was ready, at the right time, at the right place.

    1. 2

      Very often, a lot of luck and right timing is what makes a business go nuts. It happened to me in 2000 selling domain names. I definitely did not plan that the Dotcom world would go crazy. But I just held on for a mad ride. Zoom got lucky too.

  6. 2

    This is really cool, never thought that zoom calls will be a way to go for early brand strategy.

  7. 2

    Enjoy the insight and discussion here @steveprocter. 👍

    Would you mind sharing your templated approach to converting those contacts into Zoom meetings? Keen to optimise here too. 🙏

    1. 1

      hey Paul, I've written a bit about this further up/down this thread. search for primary place I reach out to people is Linkedin to find it 😊

  8. 2

    Hi Steve,
    I don't see Zoom and Twitter opposed to each other in this story.
    You do have an audience, albeit on LinkedIn, that you leverage to reach out individually rather through mass shout-outs and posts.
    So for me yours is a story of how LinkedIn can replace Twitter to build following, audience, and meaningful relationships that can turn into business customers, partners, or even investors.
    It's a matter of where you are comfortable (the dynamics of each social platform is different) and whether your ideal audience is actually in sufficient size on that platform you're comfortable with.
    My two cents :-)
    Laura

    1. 1

      Hi Laura, you make some good points and perhaps you're right that this is more about not using Twitter (or Linkedin) for mass shout-outs and the social stuff.

      But I still worry that the dynamic on Twitter is about look at me, look at me and very little engaging conversation and thought takes place. And isn't that what the whole Like and follow thing was designed for; the very design of the UX is about a post followed by lots of serial responses. There is no true mechanism for allowing a deep conversation.

      Although that can be said for many forums I suppose. Just look at this thread - it has only gone 1 or possibly 2 threads deep. Nobody wants to pick up a conversation and run with it. Just a quick reply to get our names associated with the OP and then move on to the next.

      So mentioning Zoom as I did is as much about trying to say how early-stage growth strategy should be about building 1-on-1 conversations and relationships, not just shouting at/with the crowd.

  9. 2

    Really interesting take on things. I think both have a place. And using them to their full advantage is what most people aren't doing.

    I recently set up a new Twitter just to consume and interact with the people that I want to, without being off topic with my other Twitter account. I feel having very specific Twitter accounts can help instead of a generic all in one approach.

    Great post and takeaways. Thanks.

    1. 1

      yeah that's a good idea. keep those personal tweets seperate.

  10. 2

    I'm also doing the Zoom calls approach, how are you booking 30 calls a week though? Would love to know.

    1. 2

      focus! a lot of outreach on Linkedin, followup and a CTA of "I'd love to setup a discovery call".

      then sleep for 2 hrs, and start all over again.

      Never ending... 😊

      1. 2

        For sure! I do have a few specific questions do you mind if I email?

        1. 1

          hey Farouq, feel free to ask here - let's keep it open so everyone can learn.

          1. 2

            Sure, basically the problem I'm having is finding balance between being too salesy vs beating around the bush.

            My bottleneck right now is actually setting up the discovery call, or you might say the intro. After that it's much more straightforward.

            So let's see:

            1. Do you send connection request with message, or do you use inMail?

            2. If connections, how many per day do you send would you say? Have you been warned by LinkedIn?

            3. Could you provide an example of the first message you send?

            4. How long do you wait (if at all) before pitching/setting up the discovery call?

            That's it for now!

            1. 1

              My own experience is inMail is a flag that says "they're about to sell me something". So sadly I waste the 30 I get given for free every month.

              Connection requests work well for me. because I target them well and the accompanying message (you must add this) is non-spammy and saying that you have something you're working on that may be helpful, and asking if you can send more info. Or words like that - make up your own so they are natural and in your voice.

              I follow up once they say "yes send me more info". keep the reply short (2 paras max), and ask for discovery call to chat more. if they say yes, then send them Calendly link.

              Linkedin now only allows 100 per week. No getting around that.

              1. 1

                I see, I think my issue is trying to do some discovery during the initial chat. Now when I think about it, people are too busy to be chatting on LinkedIn.

                From my understanding you go directly to the discovery call? I'll try that approach today, and see if it works!

  11. 2

    Hi Steve, if you are having trouble reaching investors, just use https://investorscout.co/

    Hope that helps :)
    Thorsten from Super-Ads.net

    1. 1

      That's alright, I don't need paid platforms like that, as I have access to tens of thousands of investors for free. What I do need though is more manpower to contact them all and have the discovery calls.

  12. 2

    @steveprocter good for you realising it was causing you some hassle but even more props for coming off it given it’s related to your business.

    I’m not on much social media (no fb, insta, tik tok etc.,) and this was a decision made when starting the business was we were only going to focus on organic inbound marketing (we’re a content marketing agency so this kinda works in showing we know what we’re doing anyway).

    I agree with what @AnGuRuSO said, and I think this is much like when creating blog content for example, if you try and write blogs simply for the algorithm, you’ll be penalised and it won’t work.

    I think Twitter etc., has a natural method of if you’re only writing content for the sake of generating some marketing volume as opposed to providing VALUE, it will take far longer and be much more work.

    All the best!

    A

    1. 2

      Thanks for the feedback Adam, it is always great to hear other viewpoints.

      In the early stages of a startup, we should focus 110% on selling our product and proving there is a need for it. So I feel posting/liking/retweeting on platforms like Twitter is a longer-term play, to build our brands once we are established.

      Just as (another contraversial view),... SEO are three letters that should not enter an early-stage founder's head for at least 6-12 months 😊

      I appreciate we need to think in the back of our heads about longer term outlooks, organic inbound, brand, etc. And agencies like yourself can certainly help with this. But I just do not think it belongs in the early stages when everything should be about pure survival.

      However, I'm just about to reply in this thread to @ayushchat, who possibly makes some excellent points about how Twitter can be used early on...

  13. 2

    This is awesome! Thank you for sharing. I am going to do the same now! Will update you.

  14. 2

    Zoom.us is UP and reachable by us.

  15. 2

    I love this Steve. Do you have any preferred methods that you could share for reaching out to potential clients to get the Zoom call?

    1. 2

      Ok so for me, I need to reach investors, to get them to join the platform (rather than as investors). I scour all sorts of places to get names of them. The research part is rough and ready, googling, finding lists, etc, and there is no pretty way to do this, whatever your market.

      But then the primary place I reach out to people is Linkedin - no, not the social posting side of it, for same reasons as I don't use Twitter! Although having said that, I do find that I can almost bear Linkedin posting and get good responses when I reply to posts. Unlike Twitter, I still feel human after posting 😊

      For me, Linkedin is about 1-on-1 contacts and connections. My inbox on there is as busy as my email inbox.

      I already have 13,000 contacts on Linkedin, built organically since 2007. Plus I find I am quite lucky that when I reach out to them or connect with new people, my history seems to be sufficient to awaken their interest and I get a high percentage agree to a call.

      I know this can often be difficult for people with less time in the industry as I suppose targets can be very picky with who they give their time to. So it becomes a numbers game and you need to get the percentage of positive responses up as much as you can. Trial and error. Keep the intro short, polite and succinct and monitor which wording works.

      I never go in for a hard sale, it's just about showing them something I'm working on that may be interesting to them. I get the call and even then, it is only a 25-min discovery Zoom call, not a sell. I will follow up (usually on Linkedin messaging because that channel is now proven with them, so do not switch to email).

      I prefer the slowly slowly approach, but I am sure some hardened sales people on here will go a bit harder - I'd welcome thoughts on how to convert discovery calls into a cold hard sale. I think for many of us entrepreneurs, even veterans, this bit is always hard. Thoughts welcome 😊

      1. 2

        Could you give us a couple of examples of how this actually looks conversation wise?

        Is it like under the frame that you have this thing that might be helpful to them, or is it, "would be cool to jump on a call to break the ice" type of frame?

        This is something I'm totally open to do for my SaaS Leapfrog Leads.

        1. 2

          Hey Gavin, I'm not going to give the actual words, because knowing the internet, they'll get copied a million times and people will start receiving those same exact words too often and begin ignoring them 😊

          So you need to make your own words - ones that are natural to you and how you speak. Along the lines of "hey I'm working on something that could be useful,... can I send you some details?"

          Then after they say yes, reply with 1 or maximum 2 very short paragraphs. Do not swamp them with pages. And do not send attachments with lengthy diatribe...too early and you'll kill it! But this is when you also ask if they'd like to have a 20 minutes discovery call.

          Follow up on these 7 days later as some people are slow to respond.

          I am experimenting with that first message offering a call straight away, and you might want to try this as well. I think it can work well if the call is purely I'm building something new for our industry and would love your feedback.

          1. 3

            Appreciate the input!

            Totally understand what you mean about not giving the exact words 😅

            You answered my curiosity exactly, so it sounds like you go "right for it" for the most part.

            I.e. you're setting the frame of, "look, maybe be able to give you value, i wanna set up a call with you"

      2. 2

        Thanks for the thoughtful reply Steve, really interesting.

        I think the approach probably depends on what you're selling, who it's to, and the value of the sale.

        I prefer discovery calls first like you, to determine whether the person needs what I have. For me sales, is about helping people. I listen to your circumstances, your problems, ask open questions to learn more. Then, if I know the product will solve your problem, I can present the solution in the follow up call, and I'm helping to solve your problem.

        But, my background is in high value B2B products, normally services. I've never sold lower value products where you don't have the luxury of taking that time on a sale. Not online at least.

        1. 1

          The amount I'm charging investors (annual membership) justifies calls too 😊

          But I would say, even if people are launching a small £10/month Saas, that setting up discovery calls for the first 100 clients is a decent strategy. They will give so much more feedback that a bunch of Likes. This feedback may help with any tweaking or pivoting that is needed. Or if all is ok then these 100 people will become the best product ambassadors.

  16. 2

    This is a very interesting perspective, thanks for sharing.

    I wouldn't completely discard Twitter, though, as it serves a specific purpose. But yes, overfocusing on it, especially in the early stages of a startup is probably not the way to go.

    1. 1

      Yeah, Twitter keeps the rowdy kids off the streets at night 😊

      I suppose for me, social is branding and phone/zoom calls are selling. And at the beginning, selling is all that matters. Survive your first 2 years with cold hard sales, and then absolutely, start creating a brand.

  17. 2

    It is very good

  18. 2

    Zoom has become a language unto itself. Over the long months spent isolating, kindergarteners have grown as fluent in video conferencing as the ABCs. They are adorably reminding each other to mute or unmute during morning meetings. Grandparents, too, can now speak confidently about meeting codes and breakout rooms. Workers distanced from the communal office’s familiar walls are likely so immersed in Zoom-speak that they’re dreaming in technicolor Zoom. by https://vivatvapk.co/ & https://gbwhatsapp.fun/

    1. 1

      You are so right. It reminds me though, ...

      several years ago, before their IPO, I was at a London b2b tech exhibition and walked up to the Zoom stand, trying to ask serious questions about what opportunities there were for reselling or integrating (I owned a b2b marketing business at the time). The guy looked down his nose at me in such a snobbish manner, as if to say "don't you know we are a big and important business, and we are for big corporations only, we do not talk to little people like you".

      And now the kids and grandparents get down and use Zoom like it is just another dumb tool for families.

  19. 1

    Hmm I agree with you to some extent that followers won't give us paying customers or get us funding.

    But I tried Twitter, not to get followers, but to introduce our tool, instaminutes.com, to create awareness. It worked well I would say. Didn't get followers but some power users.

    Also, tried 1 to 1 reach on LinkedIn as well not Zoom.

    Can you please guide me how to do that?

    Since our tool is directly related to Zoom, it summarizes Zoom calls into short notes in 1 click. Basically, It helps you to get short meeting notes & insights automatically.

    If I could get people to take 1 to 1 Zoom call with me that would be awesome!

  20. 1

    Of course, having a call is much better than a Twitter conversation. But then, it's much harder to get, compared to a DM exchange on Twitter. Your comparison is not fair because you have a huge number of contacts on LinkedIn already (and I suppose they are more targeted). If I were a newcomer, I would probably try to get these calls from Twitter (but that depends on your target audience, of course).

  21. 1

    I couldn't agree more. Why spent years trying to build an audience when you could just build a real business in weeks/months.

    1. 1

      Indeed! And spending all that time growing a list of fans is pointless anyway. When it comes to announcing your plans, they’ll all behave like your mum who will always tell you ’yes dear, your startup sounds lovely’.

      Build and learn fast by speaking directly to potential clients 1-on-1. Zoom for face to face. Or apparently our smartphones have a little-used feature called ‘phone call’ 😊

  22. 1

    This comment was deleted 3 years ago

    1. 1

      Agree. Twitter will always remain Twitter. Zoom got on top of its popularity while they pandemic began. No looking at all those https://zoom.pissedconsumer.com/customer-service.html reviews it seems to me zoom goes back I little.