Archivolt
AI architecture blueprints for SaaS founders in seconds
Hey IH,
Today I launched Archivolt (archivolt.dev) on Product Hunt after building it solo for the past several months.
The frustration behind it: senior architects and staff engineers waste days drawing diagrams that look good in meetings but don't catch real system failures. Single points of failure, scaling bottlenecks, integration conflicts. Most are predictable. They just go unvalidated until code is already written.
What Archivolt does: you describe your system in plain English and get a validated architecture blueprint in 60 seconds, complete with failure detection, volatility analysis, tech stack recommendations, and production-ready scaffolds. Not a diagram generator. A validation engine.
Current traction:
Traffic from 6 countries with zero paid ads
Early paid users including Team tier purchases
IdeaProof validation score: 73/100
Stack: Next.js 15, Supabase, Claude API, Clerk, Polar.sh, Vercel
What I would love from this community:
Honest feedback on the positioning
If you are a developer or architect, does this solve a real pain you have felt?
If you find it valuable, a PH upvote today would help a lot: https://www.producthunt.com/products/archivolt?utm_source=linkedin&utm_medium=social
Happy to answer anything about the build, product decisions, or what is working so far.
Hey IH 👋
I just launched Archivolt — an AI tool that generates architecture blueprints for SaaS in seconds.
Every time I started a new SaaS project, the same painful pattern repeated. Someone asks "what's the architecture?" I open a blank Notion doc. 3 hours later I have something half-baked that nobody is fully happy with. Actual coding gets delayed by a full day.
This isn't a skill issue. Translating business requirements into a structured, presentable architecture blueprint is genuinely time-consuming — even for experienced engineers who've done it 10 times before. The real problem? There's no standard format. Everyone reinvents the wheel on every project.
So I built Archivolt. You describe your product idea, it generates a structured VBD (Value-Based Design) architecture blueprint instantly — tech stack recommendations, component breakdown, system design structure. All formatted and ready to present or build from.
Built it solo over 3 months from Lahore, Pakistan 🇵🇰 using Next.js 15, Clerk, Supabase, Paddle, and the Claude API. Just launched today, waiting on Paddle approval for payments.
Pricing: Free tier (1 generation, no signup needed), Blueprint at $49 one-time (4 generations), Pro at $29/month (unlimited), Team at $49/month.
Honest questions for IH:
Is this just a ChatGPT wrapper or does the value prop actually hold up?
Is $49 one-time for 4 blueprints right or too high?
What would make you choose this over writing your own prompt?
What's missing from the free tier?
Try it free at archivolt.dev — no signup required.
Be brutal. I'd rather hear hard feedback now than after scaling the wrong thing. 🙏
-
1
Update for everyone who commented here: Archivolt is live on Product Hunt today.
For anyone who found this post useful or tried the product, your upvote today would mean a lot for the launch ranking
Assaf, you mentioned returning the favor when Archivolt hits PH. Today is the day. Would really appreciate the support 🙏
-
1
Kamran, I think your post actually sold me on Archivolt better than the homepage did. When I read the post, I immediately understood the problem. Someone asks for the architecture, you open a blank doc, spend hours translating requirements into something structured and presentable, and actual development gets delayed. That's a pain every technical founder can picture instantly. But when I landed on the homepage and read "Know what will break before you build it" and "Validated architecture in 60 seconds", I wasn't completely sure what Archivolt actually was. Is it generating architecture, validating architecture, reviewing architecture, or predicting risks? The interesting thing is that your post answers those questions almost immediately. To me, the strongest part of Archivolt isn't knowing what will break, it's eliminating the painful process of turning an idea into a structured architecture blueprint from scratch. I genuinely think there's something here. I just think the story on the homepage is currently more abstract than the story you told in this post. I think I found the solution for this I wanna show you what I found out you might wanna see this, I see that you have X on your profile if I DM you what I found out will it be okay with you?
-
1
Thanks for the breakdown, genuinely useful. You are right that the IH post tells a clearer story than the homepage does right now. That gap is something I want to close before pushing more traffic. Appreciate the honest read. On the DM, I am good for now but thanks for the offer.
-
1
No worries at all, Kamran, totally respect that! Since you want to close that gap before driving traffic, here is the immediate direction to test right now: Swap your abstract headline for something built on the exact visceral pain you described: “Turn raw product ideas into structured architecture blueprints. Stop wasting days translating requirements from scratch.” Why this shift works? your current headline makes people think you built a bug debugger or a static testing tool. When a busy technical founder lands on your page, they completely miss the point because they are looking at your product through the wrong lens. The new hook changes everything. It tells the reader exactly what the software builds for them. Instead of trying to sell abstract risk prevention, you are targeting the exact operational bottleneck from your post: the brutal hours spent staring at a blank document trying to format architecture requirements from scratch. If you want the entire landing page structurally overhauled and completely done for you via a 48-hour sprint so you can scale traffic confidently by this weekend, I run a flat $750 conversion engine called Copystack. If you decide you want to delegate the copy work to save time, you can check the workflow and grab an open execution slot here.
(My full portfolio and platform specs are up on Contra if you need them: https://contra.com/theelaidey/work?r=theelaidey)
Either way, rootin' for Archivolt man, the tech is seriously smart!
-
-
-
1
To your "is this just a ChatGPT wrapper" question: the answer is in what the output actually looks like vs. a raw prompt. If it generates consistent structured blueprints that you can immediately share without editing, that's the product . The template fidelity is what you're selling. Generic prompt output needs rework. Yours shouldn't. On your pricing: $49 one-time for 4 blueprints is fine if the output saves even one of those 3-hour blank-doc sessions. That math is obvious to your buyer. Also, before you start pushing traffic , run your landing page through PagePulse (pagepulse.page). Free UX review with markers pinned to actual spots on the page. Good signal before scaling.
-
2
Thanks Assaf! This is exactly right — the value is in consistent, structured blueprints you can use immediately. No manual rework needed. Will definitely run through PagePulse before pushing traffic. Appreciate the signal!
-
1
Appreciate it, Kamran. I am curious what PagePulse flags on Archivolt's page. I'll appreciate it if you will share the result.
Quick ask while I've got you: I'm launching PagePulse on Product Hunt soon. The date isn't locked yet, but early upvotes are what decide where you land that day. If you're open to it I'll drop the link here or your contact email if you prefer the morning of launch. And if you launch Archivolt on PH, send me yours. Happy to return the favor.
-
-
Comment