Calfeed
Paste a schedule. Get a calendar link.
I had two other users poke around, but never do anything. Today, someone created a structured calendar from their messy work schedule.
The wedge: every "schedule sharing" tool makes you fill out a form, one event at a time. AddEvent, AddCal, CalGet — same UX since Outlook 97. Coaches, parents, organizers, creators all keep falling back to group texts and shared docs because the tools are slower than just writing it out.
Calfeed flips it. Paste what you already have — practice schedule, class list, photo of a flyer, public events page URL, CSV — and it builds a calendar feed. One stable link your audience subscribes to once in Apple, Google, Outlook, M365, or Yahoo. Edit a time and every subscriber's calendar updates on its own. No re-share, no message blast, same URL forever.
Stack: Next.js 16 on Vercel, Postgres on Neon, Drizzle ORM, Stripe for billing, Resend for transactional, Anthropic Claude doing the heavy lifting on input.
Pricing: credit packs + a single Pro tier. 1 credit = 1 new calendar or 1 re-open of an archived one. Pro is $19/mo, 25 calendars per period, branded public pages, embed widget. No seats, no extra tiers.
1 Comment
The strongest signal here is the first real user creating a calendar from a messy work schedule.
That sounds more important than the broad “schedule sharing” category.
The risk is positioning Calfeed too widely across coaches, parents, organizers, creators, and teams before one use case proves it can convert.
I’d probably watch one question closely after the PH launch:
Which group has messy schedules often enough that pasting once and sharing a stable calendar link feels like an obvious upgrade?
That is probably the first buyer wedge, not generic calendar sharing.