
Cruxi – AI FDA 510(k) copilot
AI copilot to plan and draft your FDA 510(k) submission
I just launched a new product called Spotvira.
The idea is pretty simple:
Local businesses should be able to grow through nearby business partnerships, not just ads.
With Spotvira, a business creates an offer, nearby complementary businesses share it with their own customers, and the business pays only when it turns into a real sale.
So for example, instead of a gym just running ads and hoping for leads, nearby businesses could offer that gym’s deal to their own customers as a perk. If someone redeems it and becomes a real customer, the gym pays the partner business the amount it chose in advance.
That’s the core model.
There’s also an optional customer referral add-on, but the main thing I’m trying to test is whether local businesses want a more structured, pay-per-sale partnership channel.
I’m still validating a few things:
whether the positioning is clear enough
whether the “only pay on real sale” model resonates
and which local vertical to focus on first
Would love honest feedback from people here, especially on:
the idea itself
the landing page
and whether this sounds like a real pain point or just something interesting in theory
URL: https://spotvira.com
Hey IH 👋
We’re building Cruxi, an AI copilot for FDA 510(k) submissions.
It’s a very niche product. If you’re not in medtech or regulatory, it might sound like complete alien language – and that’s totally fine. We’d love feedback mainly from people interested in the business / indie side rather than the medical details.
What problem we’re solving
Early-stage medtech teams hit a wall when they reach FDA 510(k):
– figuring out the right product code and regulation
– finding solid predicates
– understanding what testing/regulatory evidence is expected
– then formatting everything into eSTAR and submission-ready docs
Most teams either:
– burn months trying to figure it out themselves, or
– pay 5-figure consulting fees very early in their journey.
What Cruxi does
We built a chain of AI agents that:
– classify the device and map it to regulations/product codes
– surface relevant predicates, guidance, recalls, safety comms
– suggest likely testing and documentation expectations
– draft eSTAR-ready sections you can review and edit
It’s not meant to replace experienced regulatory consultants. It’s meant to reduce the chaos and give founders/RA teams a clear starting point and drafts to work from.
Why we’re posting here
We know this is super niche for Indie Hackers. So rather than “judge it as a consumer app,” we’d really appreciate feedback on:
– Does the positioning make sense as a bootstrapped/B2B SaaS?
– Any ideas on how you’d approach distribution for such a narrow niche?
If you are in medtech / RA / consulting and want to play with it, we’re happy to give you access and would love brutally honest (but kind 😅) feedback.
👉 Product: https://cruxi.ai
👉 Product Hunt launch (in 5 hours): https://www.producthunt.com/products/cruxi?comment=5030895
Happy to answer questions about the product, the tech stack (GCP + Vertex + MongoDB + a chain of agents), or the go-to-market side.
1 Like
Comment
About
We’re working on Cruxi because 510(k) submissions are brutally hard for the people who can least afford delays and five-figure consulting fees: early medtech teams. Once you hit FDA, everything slows down around classifi

Comment