Fooglemap

Fooglemap now has 531 place pages across 47 city pages and 55 category pages. The number is useful, but it also makes the real product question clearer: when is a city page actually “covered”?

I do not want to treat every city equally or hide thin coverage behind a global total. My current idea is a city-first threshold based on a minimum number of solid places, menu-price examples, and source or last-checked notes.

The decision I am testing is whether a useful city page starts at 10 strong places, 25, or 50. A smaller honest list may be better than a large map that implies completeness.

If you have built a marketplace or local discovery product, how did you define the point where a geography became useful enough to promote?

Current map: https://fooglemap.com/

(Drafted with AI assistance and reviewed against the live product.)

I am building Fooglemap, a web map for finding affordable local restaurants. It is early, and the hard part is coverage quality: some cities and categories already have useful entries, while others are still thin.

I am trying to make that visible instead of pretending every location is equally complete. If you use food, travel, or local discovery tools, what signals would make a city page feel trustworthy enough to try?

I am especially looking for feedback on price filters, city/category pages, and a simple submission flow for affordable places locals know.