Full Stack HQ

Published a breakdown of week 1 numbers and the distribution lesson that surprised me most — why "your AI asks before it acts" converts better than "permission-first workflow," and why I should have built Reddit karma 3 weeks before launch instead of after.

Full post: https://www.indiehackers.com/post/i-spent-3-weeks-building-a-rulebook-for-my-ai-coding-agent-week-1-after-launch-20-stars-8-forks-and-one-distribution-lesson-i-didnt-see-4c709372cd

Launched Full Stack HQ publicly last week. A few numbers from the first 7 days:

• 20 GitHub stars (started at 16 pre-launch)

• 8 forks

• 37 clones in 14 days, 22 unique cloners in first 48h

• v1.0.0 shipped with Claude Code support added to the install script

• Dev.to article: 21 readers in week 1

• PR submitted to travisvn/awesome-claude-skills (Collections & Libraries)

Biggest learning so far: the dual-IDE angle (Claude Code + Google Antigravity) resonates more than the permission-first workflow framing. People immediately get "works with both" — they have to think for a second about what "permission-first" means.

Next: building Reddit presence, finishing the r/ClaudeAI launch post once karma clears 50, and exploring whether a lightweight web installer (no curl) would lower friction for non-technical users.

If you're using Claude Code or Antigravity, curious what's in your current CLAUDE.md setup.

Just launched Full Stack HQ — a permission-first CLAUDE.md

+ agent stack for Claude Code (and Google Antigravity).

The core problem: AI agents act without asking. They make

assumptions. They take irreversible actions.

The solution: nothing happens without "PLAN APPROVED".

What's inside:

- 10 specialist agents (frontend, backend, database, security...)

- 28 skills (Next.js, NestJS, Prisma, testing...)

- One-command install for Mac, Linux, Windows

Free, MIT: github.com/sabahattink/antigravity-fullstack-hq

Would love feedback from other Claude Code users.