
WebhookHQ
Automate your incoming webhook
Visit Website
March 31, 2019
Action
The core feature for the whole hookeepr 2.0, output your webhook to different channel.
Like
Comment
March 28, 2019
a more visual way to add filter
I find out not many of user using the filter feature, doing a short gif this round for the v2
Like
Comment
March 18, 2019
Version 2.0 WIP
Setup trello as public roadmap, might share some public stats there as well.
Like
Comment
November 16, 2018
Brainstorm for v2
Having some ideas for version 2, if you have any feedback please share with me !
Like
Comment
Like
Comment
About
I build WebhookHQ because I found it webhooks is pretty standard among products/services, what if you can keep all these different webhooks and allow to query with API, something interesting can be built.

2 Comments
Hey @knight, I like your service and think the rebranding is good!
Had a client who could have benefited from something similar a year ago. They would have pumped a lot of webhook events into the service to have an api for that data.
Not sure what your target customer looks like, but seems close to this client of mine. Any reason data isn't persisted indefinitely?
Also, what are actions?
Good idea btw!
Hi,
Yeah, it seems like that is my target customer.
I m actually still consider how long should the data been kept, trying to find the sweet spot for each plan, one of the important points is to keep minumum resources usages for free tier users.
One of the major features for version 2.0 is actually called Action which was renamed to "Channel", this added support to of output of the Webhooks. When an incoming webhook trigger, other than saving it and retrieve by API, it can trigger a channel output immediately. Currently, there are 2 "Channel" supported, Slack & Webhook.
Actions now represent usages on WebhookHQ, every incoming webhooks and outgoing channel consider actions, the system charge users based on numbers of actions.
I hope this clear, let me know if there are any more doubts.