monoznote

Relevant notes from your past, right when you need them

September 20, 2026 What if your old notes could find you?

I’ve always taken a lot of notes, but rarely went back to them.

Ideas, things I learned, and random thoughts slowly disappear into an endless pile of notes.

I didn’t want another system of folders and tags. I wanted my old thoughts to come back to me when they’re actually relevant.

So I’m building monoznote.

As you write, monoznote surfaces relevant notes from your past based on what you’re writing now.

It’s an early MVP, and I’m looking for feedback:

Would this help you rediscover things you’ve forgotten, or would it just create more noise?

Try it here: monoznote.com

Chasehwng

3 Likes

10 Comments

Say something nice…

Post Comment

1

I've ALWAYS wanted to build this!

Nicolò

·
a day ago
·
Reply
1

The open vs reuse split Aryan flagged is the right metric. Click-through alone will flatter a noisy resurfacer. What has bitten me is notes that float free of the source. When something comes back, I want the original passage next to it, not just the orphaned bullet. Otherwise I spend the next minute reconstructing why I cared. Curious whether monoznote keeps a hard link back into the note's original context, or whether resurfacing is text-similarity only for now.

Stanly Thomas

·
a day ago
·
Reply
1. 1
  
  That's a great point. Right now, monoznote uses whole-note similarity, and the surfaced note links back to the original note, but I don't yet show the exact relevant passage. I considered chunk-level retrieval, but for the MVP I wanted to first validate whether people actually reuse surfaced notes before adding that complexity. And I agree — “open” vs. “reuse” is a much more meaningful signal than click-through alone. Thanks for pointing that out!
  
  Chasehwng
  
  ·
  a day ago
  ·
  Reply
1

The resurfacing thesis is clear, but the key test is behavior. Have users actually rediscovered useful notes they wouldn’t have found otherwise?

Aryan Sinh

·
3 days ago
·
Reply
1. 1
  
  Spot on. That's the exact quetion this MVP is testing. I'm planning to track whether users actually click and build on these resurfaced notes or just dismiss them. What would make a resurfaced note feel truly useful vs. noise for your workflow?
  
  Chasehwng
  
  ·
  3 days ago
  ·
  Reply
  1. 1
    
    The useful signal for me would be whether resurfacing changes what someone does next, not just whether they click. Are you planning to distinguish “opened” from actually reusing or acting on the note?
    
    Aryan Sinh
    
    ·
    3 days ago
    ·
    Reply
    1. 1
      
      You're right. I actually assumed that opening a recommended note would, at the very least, help trigger the user's memory and make their current work easier. But your point made me rethink the difference between simply “opening” something and actually “reusing” it. I think I need to explore more ways for users to actually reuse their past knowledge. For example, as Thomas mentioned, showing the exact relevant passage right away, or even suggesting past text in a form that can be naturally incorporated into the current note, like autocomplete. That's a really useful perspective. It gives me another important product question to explore.
      
      Chasehwng
      
      ·
      a day ago
      ·
      Reply
      1. 1
        
        Could take this over email sometime if that’s easier — happy to follow your lead.
        
        Aryan Sinh
        
        ·
        a day ago
        ·
        Reply
        
        1
        
        Thanks, Email would be great. Feel free to reach me at [hello@monoznote.com](mailto:hello@monoznote.com), and we can continue the conversation there.
        
        Chasehwng
        
        ·
        a day ago
        ·
        Reply
        
        1
        
        Thanks! I’ve just sent it over. Looking forward to hearing your thoughts whenever you have a chance.
        
        Aryan Sinh
        
        ·
        a day ago
        ·
        Reply

monoznote

About

People