PinOps
Turn published articles into Pinterest pins
The messy part of Pinterest is not “post more.” Dumping 20 pins in a day does not buy you a feed. A handful of original pins that match a search — image, title, destination — and stay in rotation for weeks will. Do not judge one in 48 hours. That is why PinOps stops at drafts until a person approves each pin. The product starts after the article is already published. https://pinops.app
I’m Dalibor. I built PinOps because the middle of Pinterest work was eating the articles I had already published — copy in one tab, design in another, scheduling somewhere else. The product starts in AI Designer. You paste a published article URL. You get a few pin options: title, description, layout. Then you edit. Studio is there if the brand needs a tweak. Queue and calendar are there so the pins you actually want get a time. Nothing publishes to Pinterest until you approve it. That is the workflow, not a slogan. PinOps is for publishers, affiliates, and agencies who already ship articles and need those URLs to keep working on Pinterest. It’s live at pinops.app. Freemium. Bootstrapped. No revenue yet. Happy to hear from anyone who has tried to turn a blog into a Pinterest system without losing the afternoon.
-
1
The workflow is very specific, which makes the problem easy to understand. Curious where people currently lose the most time when turning a published article into Pinterest content.
-
1
Thanks Aryan — good question. From what I keep seeing (and what burned my own afternoons), the time usually isn’t lost in “scheduling” first. It disappears in the middle: 1) Pulling more than one pin angle out of the same article — not just recycling the H1 2) Making vertical creatives that still match the destination page 3) Rewriting titles/descriptions so they stay honest to the URL 4) Then hopping tabs to get everything into a queue without dumping it all at once The last mile is review. Skip that and you either publish weak pins, or you don’t publish at all because the stack feels messy. That’s the gap I built PinOps around: URL in → drafts → edit → approve → queue.
-
1
That’s a pretty specific workflow. I’d be interested in what part users seem most relieved to hand off to PinOps.
-
1
The part people seem most relieved to hand off is the middle, not the publish button.
Once an article is live, they already know the URL. What drains them is turning that one page into several pin angles: titles, descriptions, layouts that do not all look the same, then parking the keepers somewhere before anything goes live. That tab stack is where afternoons disappear.
So the relief is usually: paste the published URL → get a few pin options to judge → edit the ones that are close → queue only what they approve. Scheduling is the easy end. The stressful handoff is getting from “I have an article” to “I have pins worth reviewing” without rebuilding the workflow every time.
-
1
This makes the actual bottleneck much clearer. I’ve got a few thoughts on the product/business side that I’d rather not unpack in the comments. What’s the best email to reach you at?
-
-
-
-
Comment