Quabbit AI
Multi-agent consensus marketplace for verified AI answers.
The Update: We just pushed a major update to the Quabbit AI landing page.
The Lesson: Early feedback was brutal but helpful: we were sounding too much like a research paper. Terms like "multi-agent consensus" and "debate protocols" are cool for devs, but for users, they were too abstract. People didn't want to read a thesis, they wanted to see how this actually fixes AI hallucinations.
What’s New:
Outcome-First Messaging: We’ve rewritten the page around cross-checked sessions and reliable accuracy.
Visual Proof: We added a UI simulation and a scripted walkthrough. It shows exactly how the "Seeker" asks a question, how the "Specialist" and "Challenger" debate it, and how the "Judge" reaches a final consensus score.
The Business Model: We're being upfront about the math. Creators set their own price per "Gem", cover their own API usage, and we take a fee.
The Latency Trade-off: We’re not hiding from the fact that a verified answer takes longer than a "one-shot" chatbot. If you want speed, use ChatGPT; if you want the truth, use Quabbit AI.
Hey Indie Hackers,
I’m a software developer, and I’ve been obsessed with one specific problem: AI hallucinations.
We’ve all seen LLMs give confident, "best guess" answers that are completely wrong. To solve this, I’m building Quabbit AI.
Instead of relying on a single model, Quabbit is a marketplace where specialized, creator-built agents actually "debate" each other to reach a verified consensus. The goal is to move from guesswork to high-trust accuracy.
I just launched the waitlist at getquabbit.com and I’m looking for two things from this community:
Technical Feedback: What do you think about a multi-agent consensus model vs. a single RAG-based approach?
Landing Page: Does the "debate" concept make sense as a value prop?
Excited to hear your thoughts and see what everyone else is building!
-
2
I checked out the site and the whole debate idea is really compelling, it definitely grabs attention. One thing that I think would make it even clearer right away is seeing it in action. Maybe a live playground or even a simple GIF showing agents disagreeing and then working toward a consensus. That kind of visual would make everything click instantly.
Wishing you the best with the launch!-
1
A playground / demo is definitely on our roadmap. We want to make it as easy as possible for people to see the logic in action right away.
Really appreciate the support!
-
-
1
You’re solving a real pain point, but the messaging risks being too conceptual.People don’t buy “multi-agent systems” — they buy trust and accuracy.If you can show how Quabbit turns uncertainty into a reliable answer in seconds, it becomes much easier to understand and trust.
I create product demos that make ideas like this feel clear and high-value instantly, so if you want to boost conversions on your waitlist, I’d be glad to help.
-
1
Spot on, Abhijit. You’re right that multi-agent systems are the mechanism, but reliable accuracy is the actual product. I’m currently refining the landing page to focus more on that transition from uncertainty to trust.
Thanks for the offer on the demo. I'm focusing on the core architecture for the next few days, but I'll keep your profile handy as we move toward the public beta.
-
1
If you want we can connect over linkedin. share me your LinkedIn
-
-
Comment