XZMHXDXH

Another Twitter Video Downloader (Focused Entirely on UX)

Visit Website
May 2, 2026 Stop uploading private videos: a browser-only approach to compression

I used to treat “compressing a video” as a simple problem. Pick a file, upload it, wait, download the smaller version.

Then reality hit:

The video was private (family footage, internal work recordings, client material).

The file was huge (hundreds of MB to multiple GB).

The network was slow (or simply too expensive).

The “free” tool slapped a watermark on it or required a signup at the last step.

Compression is a utility. It shouldn’t force you to trade privacy for convenience.

That’s why I built a local-first compressor that runs entirely in your browser using WebAssembly.

Try it: https://compressvideo.net/

Source (demo repo): https://github.com/xzmhxdxh/compressvideo-wasm

The idea: local-first, not “upload-first”

“Local-first” doesn’t mean offline-only. It means:

You can use a web page to get a great UX

But the actual file processing happens on your device

Your video bytes never have to leave your machine

In practice, the workflow looks like this:

Select a video file

The page loads an FFmpeg engine compiled to WebAssembly (FFmpeg.wasm)

FFmpeg runs inside the tab and produces a compressed MP4

You download the result instantly

No server storage. No opaque retention policy. No surprise watermark.

Why this works now

Two things have changed in the last few years:

WebAssembly got good enough to run real workloads in the browser

The ecosystem around FFmpeg.wasm became stable enough to build product-quality flows

For video utilities, that’s a big deal. Uploading is often the slowest and riskiest part of the experience.

A simple default: good quality, smaller size

Most people don’t want to learn bitrate math. They want a smaller file that still looks good.

So the default approach is intentionally boring:

H.264 output (compatible everywhere)

CRF-based quality control (the “set it and forget it” way)

A sensible resolution cap for typical sharing flows (1080p)

AAC audio at a conservative bitrate

It won’t be perfect for every scenario, but it covers a surprising amount of real-world usage.

The trade-offs (the part nobody advertises)

Local compression is powerful, but it’s not magic.

1) Memory limits

Your browser is not a video workstation. It has memory limits, and large videos can push it over the edge.

2) Mobile browsers are especially tight

iOS browsers can terminate heavy pages earlier than desktop browsers. If your workflow is “compress a 2GB video on an iPhone”, a cloud fallback may be the right tool.

3) CPU and battery

Encoding is CPU-heavy. That’s true on servers, and it’s true on laptops. Local-first means you control privacy, but you also spend local compute.

Local-first as a principle

I don’t think every tool should be local-only.

But for private videos, local-first is a default worth fighting for:

You get privacy “for free” (because nothing is uploaded)

You avoid network bottlenecks

You remove a huge chunk of trust surface area

And when the file is too large or the device is too constrained, you can always offer a cloud option as a fallback — transparently and intentionally.

Try it

CompressVideo.net: https://compressvideo.net/

Source code (demo repo): https://github.com/xzmhxdxh/compressvideo-wasm

If you try it and it breaks on a specific device or file format, I’d love to know the details. Those edge cases are where local-first utilities get better.

Comment

March 28, 2026 Building TikSpider: Engineering a Minimalist, High-Performance TikTok Downloader

Let's be honest. Have you ever tried searching for a "TikTok Video Downloader" on Google?

The search results are a UX nightmare. You click on a link, and you are immediately bombarded with:

  • 3 different popup windows.

  • 5 buttons that say "DOWNLOAD NOW" (4 of which are malware ads).

  • A blindingly bright, cluttered interface from 2010.

As a web developer, this frustrated me. The internet doesn't need another spammy download site. It needs tools that respect the user's time and eyes.

So, I spent my recent weekends building TikSpider.

What is TikSpider?

TikSpider.com is a blazing fast, web-based tool to download TikTok videos without watermarks, extract audio (MP3), and save TikTok Stories.

But more importantly, it’s an experiment in bringing the "Less is More" design philosophy into a space that is notoriously chaotic.

🎨 The Design Philosophy: Dark Mode & Frosted Glass

Most utility tools overlook design. I wanted to build something that feels like a native, premium app rather than a sketchy script.

I stripped away everything unnecessary. No sidebars, no sticky banner ads, no confusing navigation. Just a single, perfectly centered input field.

To make it easy on the eyes (especially for late-night scrollers), the entire UI is built around a pure Dark Mode aesthetic. I used frosted glass (glassmorphism) effects for the main interactive panels. The result is a UI that feels cold, sharp, and highly technical—exactly what a "spider" fetching data should feel like.

⚙️ Under the Hood & Features

Building this wasn't just about making it look pretty; it had to be functional and fast.

Here is what it currently handles perfectly:

  1. No Watermark Video Extraction: It parses the official URL and fetches the clean, unwatermarked HD MP4 stream directly.

  2. TikTok to MP3: A lot of users just want the trending audio. The tool isolates and extracts the audio track instantly.

  3. TikTok Stories: Stories disappear in 24 hours. TikSpider bypasses the app restrictions to let you save them locally.

  4. Photo Slideshows: It also cleanly extracts HD images from TikTok photo swipe-posts.

🌍 The Next Challenge: Global i18n and SEO Architecture

One of the most interesting technical challenges I'm tackling right now is scaling this globally. TikTok is massive in regions like Indonesia, Latin America, and Europe.

Instead of relying on auto-translate plugins, I'm building a robust hreflang based multi-language architecture (deploying native sub-directories like /es/, /id/, etc.) to serve localized versions without compromising the core Next.js/Nuxt caching performance or the minimalist UI layout.

🚀 Try it out and roast my UI!

I built this tool for users who appreciate clean, efficient software. It’s completely free, requires no installation, and will remain ad-free in its core downloading experience.

Check it out here: TikSpider.com

Comment

March 26, 2026 Building a Fast, Ad-Free Tool in a Crowded Market: The Story Behind IG Fetcher

The internet is completely oversaturated with utility websites. If you want to convert a PDF, resize an image, or download a video, a quick Google search will give you millions of results.

But there is a glaring problem: most of these websites provide an absolutely terrible user experience. They are bloated with aggressive Google Ads, confusing pop-ups, and deceptive "Download Now" buttons that lead to malware. The core functionality is buried under layers of visual clutter. As an indie developer who values clean web design, I found this incredibly frustrating—especially in the niche of social media downloaders.

So, I decided to build an alternative using a strict "Less is More" philosophy. Enter IG Fetcher.

🗑️ Ditching the Bloat: Pure Functionality

When I started designing IG Fetcher, the goal was brutal minimalism. I didn't want flashy animations, complex dashboards, or a UI that screams for attention.

A utility tool should do exactly one thing: solve the user's problem as fast as possible and get out of the way.

Here is how I applied the "Less is More" approach to the product:

  • Zero Ads: No deceptive banners or pop-ups. The screen real estate is dedicated entirely to the tool.

  • Maximum Whitespace: Instead of cramming text everywhere to game search engines, the UI relies on generous whitespace and crisp typography to guide the user's focus straight to the input field.

  • Instant Action: You paste a link, you click fetch. That’s it. No sign-ups required.

🏗️ Intent-Driven Architecture (Better UX = Better SEO)

One of the biggest mistakes developers make when building utility sites is putting every single feature on the homepage. This creates a confusing interface and dilutes the page's relevance.

Users have highly specific intents. Someone looking to save an uncompressed image doesn't need to see the audio extraction tools. Therefore, I architected the site by splitting functionalities into clean, dedicated modules:

This modular approach isn't just about a cleaner interface; it's a massive advantage. By separating the tools, each page loads incredibly fast (which search engines love) and serves the exact intent of the user without any unnecessary code overhead.

🚀 Performance as a Feature

By stripping away third-party tracking scripts, ad networks, and heavy UI libraries, the site achieves blazing-fast load times. In a space where users are impatient and just want their content quickly, speed is not just a metric—it's the core feature.

Building IG Fetcher reminded me that you don't always need to invent a brand new SaaS product to provide value. Sometimes, looking at an existing, crowded market and simply saying, "I can build a much cleaner, faster version of this," is a perfectly valid path for indie hackers.

If you are tired of the ad-heavy spam sites, give it a try. I'd love to hear feedback from other developers on building minimalist web tools! What are some of your favorite "brutally simple" utility websites?

Comment

March 24, 2026 I built an ad-free Twitter video downloader because the existing ones are a UX nightmare. Looking for SEO/Growth advice!

Hey hackers,

If you’ve ever tried to download a video, a meme, or a GIF from X (formerly Twitter), you know the exact pain I’m talking about. The market is dominated by tools that are heavily bloated with deceptive ad banners, fake "Download Here" buttons, and annoying pop-ups.

It shouldn't require dodging malware just to grab a public MP4.

So, I decided to scratch my own itch and built [SaveXTweet]

The "Less is More" Philosophy

As a builder, I strongly believe in the "less is more" design approach. I didn’t want to build just another scraper; I wanted to build a tool that respects the user's attention.

I went with a native dark mode, a clean frosted-glass UI, and zero distractions. No registration, no apps. You just paste the link and get your file.

Under the hood, it handles:

High-Quality MP4s: Fetches the highest available resolution natively.

Twitter GIFs: Converts Twitter's proprietary video wrapper back into usable GIF format.

Video to MP3: A handy feature for extracting audio from podcast clips or music videos.

The Challenge: Competing in a Red Ocean

The tech side was straightforward, but now I'm facing the real Indie Hacker challenge: Distribution and SEO in a highly saturated market. The big players in this space have massive Domain Authority (DA). I am currently focusing on long-tail keywords (like targeting GIF downloads and MP3 extraction) and publishing on developer communities to build initial backlinks. I'm also planning to build out a /es/ and /pt/ localized version soon to target the LatAm market where competition might be slightly lower.

My Ask for the Community:

1. UX Feedback: If you have a minute, please try breaking it with a weird Twitter URL at [savextweet.com] Let me know if the minimalist UI feels too simple or if it hits the sweet spot.

2. SEO Advice: For those of you who have tackled heavily dominated SEO niches (like generic utility tools), what was your zero-to-one strategy? Are there specific backlink strategies that worked for you in the early days?

Would love to hear your thoughts and feedback!

Comment

About

As a developer, I finally got tired of this( fake "Download" buttons, pop-up ads covering the screen). Downloading a public MP4 or GIF shouldn't require dodging malware.