Senduta
Send Documents. Prove Delivery.
Hey IH 👋
I just launched Senduta — a secure digital document delivery platform built specifically for India, where you can send confidential documents with legally timestamped proof of delivery, not just a "sent" confirmation.
The problem:
If you've ever sent a contract, legal notice, or invoice over email or WhatsApp, you know the pain — there's no reliable way to prove the other person actually received and opened it. Enterprise tools like DocuSign solve this, but they're priced in USD for large companies, not freelancers, consultants, or small Indian businesses who need this occasionally, not constantly.
What Senduta does:
Certified sending with a legal timestamp
Secure link delivery with email OTP verification
Full audit trail — who accessed it, when
Click-through as proof of opening (not just pixel-tracking, which is unreliable)
WhatsApp delivery alerts
Link expiry + revoke controls
Pricing:
Starts at ₹99/month — built to be affordable for individuals and small businesses, not just enterprises.Stack: Next.js, Supabase, Razorpay.
Just launched and currently working on closing early B2B customers. Would love feedback from this community — especially if you've dealt with the "did they actually receive this?" problem yourself.
Check it out: senduta.com
7 Comments
Really appreciate this, and honestly, the disc golf app story is exactly the kind of "built out of spite for bad tools" energy that got Senduta started too. To your question: yeah, we're leaning grassroots over broad LinkedIn ads. Lawyers, CAs, recruiters, and architects tend to cluster in tight communities bar association WhatsApp groups, CA study circles, local recruiter Slack/Telegram groups and that's actually a little ironic given we're building a product that's meant to replace "just WhatsApp it to them" as the default way people share confidential documents in India. So the plan is: show up where those professionals already hang out, make the pitch concrete (a client asking "did you get the file?" six months later, and you having a certificate to point to), and let word of mouth do the rest inside those niches before we ever think about paid acquisition.
The real differentiation here isn’t “proof of delivery”—it’s shifting trust from communication channels (email/WhatsApp) to a verifiable audit layer above them. If that layer becomes reliable enough, you’re not just solving delivery confirmation—you’re effectively redefining what counts as “sent” in legal workflows for smaller businesses.
This is exactly the reframe I'd use if I were pitching it back to myself. "Proof of delivery" undersells it what we're really doing is inserting a verifiable layer above the channels people already default to (email, WhatsApp) so that "sent" stops being a claim and starts being something you can point to.
For a lawyer or CA, that's the difference between "I emailed the contract" and having a timestamped, hash-verified chain of sent → delivered → opened → downloaded that can actually hold up if a client later says they never received something. If that layer gets trusted enough, it stops being a courier feature and starts being infrastructure for how small firms handle disclosure which is the bet.
That's exactly what made me think there's a bigger strategic decision underneath Senduta.
I don't think it's really about delivery verification. It's about a business decision that becomes much more significant as the product grows, and I don't think I can explain the reasoning properly in a thread without oversimplifying it.
If you're interested, what's the best email to reach you on?
for individuals don't generally send such documents every month. So, the individuals could have an option of sending one time with one-off priciing. Just my thought.
Good instinct, and it's already baked in, we didn't want to force everyone into a monthly subscription to send one contract or one certificate. Pricing is metered on deliveries, not seats or storage, so there's a free trial to start, and beyond that people can buy one-time top-up packs (no subscription, credits never expire) instead of committing to a plan. So a CA who sends three important documents a year can just buy a small pack when they need it, while firms sending dozens a month go on a regular plan. Appreciate you flagging it, though it tells me that need is visible from the outside even without me spelling it out in the post.