smrtlyFit
All-in-one for training, nutrition, and coaching.
smrtlyFit is built for people who want tracking that matches how they train — not a one-size-fits-all log.
Web: https://smrtlyfit.com
iOS: https://testflight.apple.com/join/PD9EBJG3
What you can test:
Workout tracking with templates + fast logging
Workout Style Modes (Strength, Bodybuilding, Functional/HIIT, Mobility, Yoga/Pilates, Endurance) → the UI adapts to the style
Macro & food tracking + meal templates (log repeat meals fast)
Progress tracking (measurements + trends)
Optional water + steps tracking
Gym Wallet (store multiple gym barcodes/QR codes for quick check-in)
Social features (opt-in): share wins like PRs/1RM and progress with friends
AI Coach (plan-based): guidance + proactive recommendations (pre-workout check-in)
Human coaching (plan-based): coach discovery, messaging, scheduling, payouts
If you train regularly and can give blunt feedback (bugs, UX friction, “this is confusing”), I want you in the test group.
1 Comment
Blunt builder feedback: this is a lot of surface area for one post, so I am not sure a tester knows what to care about first.
I build MetricSync on the nutrition side, and the highest intent reactions we get are not to "AI" or feature volume. They come from very concrete comparisons like cheaper than CalAI, better accuracy on messy meals, more features than basic calorie logging, and a simple 3 day free trial.
If I were tightening this, I would lead with one sharp promise for one user type. Example: "faster food and macro logging for people who train regularly" or "less friction than MyFitnessPal style tracking." Then let the rest support that.
Feature breadth is nice, but the thing that gets someone to test is usually one believable reason to switch.