Xeyria
An AI workspace that remembers your project context.
After months of building, that's the problem we're trying to solve with Xeyria.
Most development teams don't actually lose code—they lose context.
Architecture decisions disappear in Slack.
Important discussions stay buried in Discord.
Meeting notes never get connected to the actual project.
Every new AI conversation starts from zero.
We're building Xeyria to give AI persistent project understanding instead of temporary chat history.
It's now in private beta.
I'm not looking for compliments.
I'd love to know:
At what point would you stop using a product like this?
What's missing before you'd trust it with a real project?
Does the value proposition make sense from the landing page?
I'd be happy to return the favor and review your product as well.
#buildinpublic #AI #SaaS
After months of building, Xeyria is finally in private beta.
Xeyria is an AI workspace that remembers your project context, so you don't have to repeat the same information across every conversation.
Current focus
AI memory
Project context
Better collaboration
Private beta testing
I'm looking for thoughtful feedback from founders and developers.
If this sounds interesting, I'd love to hear what you think.
#buildinpublic #ai #saas
-
1
Project context feels like a more meaningful unit of memory than conversation history.
People rarely want an AI to remember every chat. They want it to remember the decisions, constraints, and assumptions that carry from one session to the next.
-
1
Appreciate this. That's exactly the direction I'm aiming for—less chat memory, more persistent project understanding. Decisions, constraints, and context should survive across sessions. Thanks for taking the time to share this.
-
2
Glad it resonated. I'm curious whether building around project understanding has changed what you now consider worth remembering versus what the system should deliberately forget.
-
1
That's been one of the biggest shifts for me.
I used to think remembering more was always better. But the more I built, the more I realized that not everything deserves to persist.
I now think long-lived memory should mostly capture decisions, constraints, goals, architecture, preferences, and unresolved questions—not every conversation that led there.
The challenge is deciding when something graduates from temporary discussion into durable project knowledge. That's still an open problem I'm exploring.
-
1
That's an interesting shift, especially the point where temporary context becomes durable knowledge.
I'd be interested in continuing the conversation by email if you're open to it. What's the best email to reach you on?
-
1
I'm happy to continue by email. Indie Hackers won't let me post my email yet because my account is new.
Could you share yours instead? I'll send you an email right away.
-
1
Absolutely. You can reach me at hello@beryxa.com.
Send me a note there and I'll keep an eye out for it.
-
-
-
-
-
-
7 Comments
Google Login would improve user experience when joining the private beta.
I'm not a technical guy but someone told us this: "Why use this when you have Claude skills? Claude also have memories."
But maybe you can target non-technical customers for this so they don't have to reexplain. But Gemini Gems can remember instructions across chats.
This is our website with a free evaluation tool if you want to test out Xeyria
https://app.firmgrove.com
It can help you define your product too.
For context, One Brain that runs your startup. Firmgrove is the co-founder you never had: it tells you what to do next to get your startup off the ground, from marketing to legal to your first clients.
Thanks, this is really valuable feedback.
Can I ask one question?
When you compared Xeyria with Claude Memory and Gemini Gems, what made them feel like the same product to you?
I'd love to understand where our messaging created that impression.
The part that the website said "Stop Re-explaining your project AI" and I immediately thought that I don't have to reexplain anything to my Gemini Gem.
Thanks for explaining—that actually helps a lot.
I think you've pointed out something important. Our intention wasn't to say "AI forgets everything," but I can see how the phrase "Stop re-explaining your project to AI" immediately led you to compare us with Gemini Gems.
We're still in private beta, and one of the biggest things we're trying to improve is how we explain what Xeyria actually is. So feedback like this is genuinely valuable to us.
Can I ask you one more question?
If our website had focused less on "stop re-explaining" and more on preserving your project's understanding as it evolves over time, would that have felt meaningfully different to you? Or would you still have assumed it's essentially the same as Gemini Gems?
I'm asking because we're trying to understand whether the confusion comes from our messaging or from the product concept itself. Your perspective would really help us improve.
Preserving your project's understanding as it evolves over time. I think this wording it's better because it makes me think that other AI chatbot looks context over time.
Have you tried putting your business idea to our free evaluation tool? It can help you define your product but of course you have to approve it.
https://app.firmgrove.com
The knowledge is based on the best available knowledge on how to build a startup (fundraising, go-to-market, product, hiring, legal basics, and the rest), extracted from public and licensed sources.
Thanks, I really appreciate you taking the time to explain your thinking.
This has honestly been one of the most useful conversations we've had during our private beta because it helped us realize how our messaging shapes people's first impression.
We'll keep iterating on it. Thanks again, and I wish you the best with Firmgrove as well.