We launched Mavibot as a place to build chatbots, set up AI sales agents, run a CRM, put together a website, the whole stack. What we didn't plan for is that having all those pieces meant nothing if using them required learning our platform first.
Someone would come in wanting one specific thing, a working chatbot on Instagram, say, and instead of getting there in a few clicks they'd hit our terminology, our menu structure, our way of thinking about flows. It technically worked. It just worked like software from a decade ago works, slow, correct, exhausting.
We spent the last couple months ripping that apart. Now, instead of a user learning our system, our internal AI does that part:
- Builds the chatbot from a plain description of what you want, no menus to learn
- Sets up a CRM shaped around your specific business on its own
- Puts together a connected website in the same flow
- Gets the whole thing live in about 5 minutes
The thing we misjudged for way too long: adding more capability to the platform and making that capability usable are two completely separate problems, and we'd only ever solved the first one.
What actually made this real for us was watching a handful of users who used to spend an hour reading through our docs before setting anything up. Now they have a working chatbot before they'd have finished reading the first page.
We're still rebuilding pieces of this weekly, and honestly not sure we're done. Curious how other founders think about it: at what point does a tool stop being something people learn and start being something that just does the thing for them?
The interesting shift is that the product is no longer the builder — it’s the outcome.
A lot of SaaS still asks users to learn the tool before getting value. The challenge now is making sure the first thing the AI creates is valuable enough that users trust it to handle more.
Really appreciate this, and yeah, that's exactly the shift we're chasing right now. Trying to get to a point where the first thing the AI hands someone is good enough on its own that they don't need to go learn the tool to trust the rest.
I appreciate you taking the time to explain your thinking.
I'd be interested in continuing the conversation by email if you're open to it. What's the best email to reach you on?
yeah you can email me at this address smngadaev @ gmail com
I can't send the email in a proper format because Indie Hackers doesn't allow me to do that yet sorry ;)
Thanks! I’ve just sent it over.
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts whenever you have a chance.