Hey Indie Hackers π
Iβm Alex, a solution architect and founder of Evalo β a tool that evaluates GitHub repositories against defined assessments to make technical hiring faster and smarter.
The idea came from a real pain: filtering coding assessments. Recruiters, hiring managers and code reviewers often receive dozens of submissions and spend hours reviewing them manually β most of which donβt meet expectations. Traditional platforms only check if code βruns,β not whether itβs good.
Evalo changes that. It automatically analyzes each GitHub repo against clear requirements β from architecture and patterns to code quality and test coverage β and scores them consistently.
β‘ Save hours on manual filtering
π€ Get objective, AI-backed evaluations
π― Focus only on the candidates who truly fit
Evalo also detects when AI tools were used in coding. We donβt treat it as cheating β but when AI is involved, expectations rise. The system automatically adjusts the evaluation bar: code should be not just correct but exceptionally polished to reflect the advantage of AI assistance. This way, scores stay fair and meaningful in a world where AI-generated code is everywhere.
Weβre just getting started at evalo.dev β Iβd love feedback from anyone dealing with technical screening or hiring challenges.
How do you handle filtering coding assessments today?