5
12 Comments

Built a tool that finds which Reddit/HN threads are making ChatGPT recommend your competitors

AI answer engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Claude don't pull product recommendations from thin air. They pull them from community threads, Reddit discussions, HN posts, and niche forums where founders and users have already debated the best tools in a category.

Most founders have zero visibility into which threads those are. So they post randomly, hope for the best, and wonder why competitors keep showing up in AI answers instead of them.

AIRankCite fixes that.

You paste your product URL, and it returns a ranked hitlist of the exact Reddit and HN threads currently shaping AI recommendations in your niche. Each result comes with a confidence score showing how much weight that thread carries, plus a tailored seeding kit with word-for-word comment copy you can drop in to start shifting the AI narrative toward your product.

It tracks ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, and Copilot. Full scan takes under 2 minutes.

Free first scan at airankcite.com

Curious what others here are doing for AI citation tracking. Is this on your radar yet or still too early for most stacks?

posted to Icon for group AI Tools
AI Tools
on April 30, 2026
  1. 1

    This is the right shape of the problem but the hard middle layer is attribution lag. We've tracked AI citations for our marketplace product for 3 months — the Reddit/HN threads ChatGPT cites today were mostly planted 6-18 months ago. So seeding has a lag function: today's effort surfaces in answers next quarter, not next week.

    Two things I'd add to the scoring: (1) thread age decay metric — older threads carry more weight in stable niches, less in fast-moving ones, depending on how often the model retrains for that topic. (2) competitor seeding intent inference — a meaningful fraction of 'organic-looking' founder comments in popular threads are placed marketing. Spotting them helps you understand what tone actually converts in the AI cite layer.

    Curious what your confidence score weighs — thread upvotes? Recency? Outbound link count?

  2. 1

    this is a real gap btw, spent the last week watching ChatGPT cite year-old reddit threads that have completely shifted what 'best X' means in some niches. AI citation tracking is going to be its own category soon.

    one thing worth flagging though: the seeding kit angle lands very differently with different audiences. people in this thread will read it as competitive intel, but the same flow described as 'word-for-word comment copy you can drop in to shift the AI narrative' reads as astroturf to a non-founder. that's a brand-risk you might be inheriting from the framing more than the product.

    could be worth two clearly separated modes: a passive one that just tells you which threads carry weight (great for SEO/positioning research, no concerns), and an active one with a stronger framing like 'genuine founder responses to threads where your product is already mentioned'. same engine, way less landmine.

    curious if you've seen that split in how people respond to the demo.

  3. 1

    The visibility into which threads influence AI answers is interesting. The part I’d question is how stable those signals are. Community threads can shift quickly, and AI outputs don’t always update in a predictable way.

    Also feels like there’s a fine line between contributing to those discussions and trying to “seed” them. If it comes across the wrong way, it could backfire. Have you seen consistent movement in recommendations after engaging with the threads you surface?

    1. 1

      On stability: threads shift but topic clusters don’t. LLMs weight accumulated engagement over time, so even older threads in the right cluster stay influential. The scan tracks both.

      On seeding: the copy it generates is genuine contribution to existing conversations, not promotional filler. Thin comments don’t move citations anyway, Reddit buries them fast.

      On results: yes, consistent movement. Typically 3 to 6 weeks depending on the LLM. Run the scan and I can walk you through what it surfaces for your niche.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

  4. 1

    We are looking for someone who can lend our holding company 300,000 US dollars.

    We are looking for an investor who can lend our holding company 300,000 US dollars.

    We are looking for an investor who can invest 300,000 US dollars in our holding company.

    With the 300,000 US dollars you lend us, we will open a game programming and e-commerce company.

    We will use the 300,000 US dollars you invest in our holding company to establish a game programming company and an e-commerce company.

    With the 300,000 US dollars budget you will provide to our holding company, we will open a game programming and e-commerce company.

    Why would we establish a company in these two business sectors?

    The game company we will establish will produce our own game projects and generate significant revenue by publishing our games for a fee on major gaming platforms such as the Play Store, Apple Store, Microsoft Store, and Steam.

    We will release the game projects we produce as paid downloads on digital stores, generating significant revenue by charging a fee for each download.

    The e-commerce company we will establish will promote our game projects and increase the download rate of our game.

    The e-commerce company we will establish will advertise our game projects, helping to introduce our game to a wider audience, and in this way, the download rate of our game will increase rapidly.

    In short, our game company will produce game projects and publish these games on digital stores. Our e-commerce company will promote these game projects, increasing download rates and thus generating significant revenue.

    By working in coordination between our game company and our e-commerce company, we will create great games and the download rates of the games we make will increase rapidly.

    Today, the gaming industry is a large, innovative sector that generates significant returns, so by focusing on the gaming industry, we will achieve substantial income.

    Because we have a strong infrastructure and advertising network, and an expert team, we will be able to grow the company rapidly by focusing on the gaming sector.

    Since we have the infrastructure ready in the gaming industry, we will be making big money in a short time.

    Because the gaming industry is a highly in-demand sector, and because we have a strong infrastructure and foundation, entering this sector will allow us to generate significant revenue.

    How will we advertise the game projects we will produce?

    We will increase the number of downloads for our game using 5 different advertising tactics.

    Thanks to the 5 different advertising tactics we will use, our game will be downloaded by an average of 10,000,000 people in just 2 months.

    Thanks to our strong advertising strategy, we will increase our game's download rate in a short time.

    1. Advertising strategy: By continuously promoting our game on global social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, X, Telegram, LinkedIn, and TikTok, we will attract a large audience to our game.

    2. Advertising strategy: We have 170 unique social media applications for each country. By using these applications, we will promote our game to many countries and increase its international popularity.

    3. Advertising Strategy: Our game will feature a referral system that will benefit both existing and new users. The system will work as follows: each registered user will receive a unique referral code, which they can share with others to bring in new customers. When a new user registers, they will enter this referral code in the designated field. The system will automatically recognize the code, and the user who shared the code will receive 2 US dollars for each new customer they bring in. Additionally, the new user who registers using the referral code will receive a 20% discount on the game purchase. This will motivate existing users to recommend the game to more people by earning income from their referrals, and will make new users more willing to join thanks to the discount. This will create a rapid and natural spread among users, allowing our game to reach a wider audience and grow quickly.

    4. Advertising strategy: By using advertising platforms like YouTube Ads, Google Ads, Facebook Ads, and Instagram Ads, we will have our game's promotional video viewed by millions, which will increase the number of downloads.

    5. Advertising strategy: We will place advertisements for our game on blogs and news websites.

    Thanks to our strong advertising network and strategy, our game will receive 10,000,000 downloads in just 2 months.

    By releasing our game on multiple app stores instead of just one, the download rate will increase even more.

    We will release our game on major digital stores such as the Play Store, Microsoft Store, App Store, and Steam.

    By implementing these 5 advertising tactics, we will increase our game's download rate in a short time.

    We aim for our game to have an average of 10,000,000 downloads within 2 months.

    How will we generate revenue from the game project we will produce?

    1. Our game will cost 7 US dollars. Since it will be a paid game, we will earn money for each download.

    2. The game will feature a purchase system. Some characters, weapons, and vehicles in the game will be offered for a fee. Users can purchase this content for a certain price to strengthen their characters and improve their performance and progress in the game more quickly and effectively.

    Thanks to the in-game purchase feature, we will generate significant revenue.

    1. By sharing our game on multiple digital stores instead of just one, we will further increase our revenue.

    2. We will add short ads to our game using Google AdMob and generate revenue from these ads.

    3. When our game's download numbers increase, we will advertise the products of companies for a fee.

    Today, the gaming market is a highly demanded sector, and by entering this market, we will generate significant revenue in a short time.

    With our expert game programming and e-commerce team, we will create great games, attract large audiences to our games, and generate significant profits.

    Thanks to our strong advertising network and advertising tactics, our game will receive an average of 10,000,000 downloads in just 2 months.

    Since we will be releasing our game on many digital stores, our game will definitely get a total of 10,000,000 downloads.

    We will have earned a total average of 70,000,000 US dollars from our game.

    Since the download price of our game will be 7 US dollars, we will earn 70,000,000 US dollars just from the number of downloads.

    Even companies that make simple games are earning billions of dollars these days.

    The gaming industry is a very profitable sector.

    By investing in our holding company, you too will earn significant returns and increase your wealth.

    How much revenue will you generate by investing in our game project?

    If you lend our holding company 300,000 US dollars, I will return your money as 950,000 US dollars on February 26, 2027.

    If you invest 300,000 US dollars in our holding company, we will return your money as 950,000 US dollars on February 26, 2027.

    I will invest the 300,000 US dollars you lent to our holding company in the gaming sector, increase its value, and return it to you as 950,000 US dollars on February 26, 2027.

    I will repay the 300,000 US dollars you lent to our holding company as a loan to you as 950,000 US dollars on February 26, 2027.

    You will receive your money back as 950,000 US dollars on February 26, 2027.

    By investing in our holding company, you will have increased your money within a few months.

    How to contact us:

    To learn how you can lend our holding company 300,000 US dollars, please send a message to the WhatsApp number, Telegram username, or Signal number below. I will provide you with detailed information.

    To learn how you can invest 300,000 US dollars in our holding company, please send a message to the WhatsApp number, Telegram username, or Signal number below. I will provide you with detailed information.

    To learn how you can increase your money by investing 300,000 US dollars in our game project, send a message to the WhatsApp number, Telegram username, or Signal number below. I will provide you with detailed information.

    For detailed information, please send a message to the WhatsApp number, Telegram username, or Signal number below. I will provide you with detailed information.

    To learn how you can lend our holding company 300,000 US dollars and to get more detailed information about our game project, please send a message to the WhatsApp number, Telegram username, or Signal number below. I will provide you with detailed information.

    My WhatsApp contact number:
    +212 619-202847

    My Telegram username:
    @adenholding

    Signal contact number:
    +447842572711

    Signal username:
    adenholding.88

  5. 1

    Smart positioning. One axis I'd love to see surfaced: not all citations are equal-weight in actual purchase decisions.

    LLMs heavily prioritize threads where the recommendation answers a specific buying-stage question ('looking for X to do Y under €Z') vs. generic 'best Y tool 2026' lists. The former show up in real purchase-intent prompts, the latter mostly inflate visibility scores without converting.

    Does AIRankCite differentiate between these in the visibility lift metric, or are all mentions weighted the same?

    1. 1

      That distinction is exactly right and currently not fully surfaced. The confidence score weights threads by engagement depth and recency, but it doesn’t yet segment by buying-stage intent vs generic visibility.

      A thread answering “looking for X under $Y” ranks higher than a “best tools 2026” list in the raw signal, but that separation isn’t explicit in the output yet.

      That’s going on the roadmap. Purchase-intent citation weight as a standalone axis is the right call. Would you want that broken out as a separate score or as a filter on the existing results?​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

  6. 1

    This is on my radar but I think the playbook breaks differently for non-English markets and it's worth flagging.

    We're building an email/CRM/voice product for European SMBs. When I asked ChatGPT and Perplexity in French "meilleur logiciel email IA pour PME francaise" the recommendations are wildly thin - mostly translated US tools with bad French support. Almost nothing surfacing from French startup forums because those communities are smaller and AI engines weight English Reddit threads disproportionately.

    My current hypothesis: for non-English builders, the citation game has two halves. Half 1 = English threads (Reddit, HN, IH) where you compete with everyone. Half 2 = local-language forums where you can dominate fast because incumbents ignore them. The local half pays off in 6 months when AI engines catch up to non-English content (already happening with Mistral and Claude in French, faster than expected).

    Question for you: does AIRankCite handle non-English citation sources well? Specifically curious if you crawl French and German tech forums and weight them appropriately, or if you're English-Reddit-first like most tools in this space. That's the gap I'd pay for.

    Going to run a scan on our domain.

    1. 1

      Your hypothesis is right and it’s one of the sharper framings I’ve seen of the problem. The two-half playbook maps closely to what the data shows.

      To answer directly: AIRankCite is currently English-Reddit-first. French and German tech forums are not yet weighted as standalone citation sources. That’s a real gap, not a roadmap maybe.

      The non-English citation layer is planned, and your use case is exactly the brief for it. Local-language forums where incumbents aren’t competing yet, indexed by Mistral and Claude faster than most expect. That’s a high-leverage window and a short one.

      Run the scan on your domain. Even the English-side results will show you where the gap is and what you’re up against from US tools in your category.

      Would love your feedback when it’s done.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

  7. 1

    This is one of those products where the wedge is stronger than the current name.
    The real value is not “AI citation tracking.”
    It’s competitive narrative control.
    Founders are not paying to see which Reddit thread matters.
    They’re paying to understand why competitors keep getting recommended and how to change that before it compounds into distribution loss.
    That’s the real product.
    AIRankCite explains what it does.
    It also traps it in a narrow SEO/tooling frame.
    If this expands beyond “find citations” into “shape recommendation share,” the product likely outgrows the current name fast.
    Exirra.com fits that direction much better.
    Sharper, more defensible, and broad enough to hold a larger competitive intelligence layer once this becomes less about tracking citations and more about controlling category narrative.

    1. 1

      Really appreciate this framing, you're articulating the bigger vision better than I have. You're right that 'find citations' is the wedge, and 'control competitive narrative' is where the real value compounds.

      For now I'm keeping AIRankCite because it clearly communicates the entry point, founders immediately understand what they'll get. But as we expand into recommendation shaping and competitive intelligence, a rebrand is definitely on the table.

      Thanks for the domain suggestion too, noted for when we're ready to make that leap.

      1. 1

        That’s fair near-term.

        Just worth watching how fast “clear entry point” turns into category ceiling.

        AIRankCite is strong while the job is:
        help me understand what this does

        It gets expensive the moment the job becomes:
        help me trust this as a competitive intelligence system

        That shift usually happens earlier than founders expect.

        That’s the point where the name stops clarifying the wedge and starts shrinking the category.

Trending on Indie Hackers
How are you handling memory and context across AI tools? User Avatar 111 comments Do you actually own what you build? User Avatar 66 comments Code is Cheap, but Scaling AI MVPs is Hard. Let’s Fix Yours. User Avatar 34 comments How to see your entire business on one page User Avatar 31 comments I Think MCP Will Punish Thin API Wrappers User Avatar 27 comments What AI Is Actually Changing in IT Certification Prep User Avatar 19 comments