Follow-up: WindowFinesse now has a beta request page (Mac window arrangement)
Earlier I posted looking for Mac beta testers for WindowFinesse and someone suggested putting a proper landing/request page up so people aren’t stuck DMing for the build.
That’s live now:
https://windowfinesse.com/#beta
WindowFinesse is a native macOS window arrangement app (not App Store — needs Accessibility). Private beta build 0.10.64 is Developer ID signed + notarized. Looking for people who’ll actually install it, run a ~30 min checklist, and report real bugs — not a feature wishlist.
If you use Rectangle/Magnet/etc and can spare half an hour, request access on the page. Happy to answer questions here too.
What usually breaks first in Mac window tools for you?
Makes sense. Are you planning to charge for it, or keep it free for now?
Nice progress. What is the next thing you are focusing on?
Thanks for sharing the numbers, that makes it much easier to follow.
Makes sense. Are you planning to charge for it, or keep it free for now?
Thanks for sharing the numbers, that makes it much easier to follow.
Nice progress. What is the next thing you are focusing on?
Interesting approach. What was the hardest part to get right?
Appreciate the honesty here, most people only share the wins.
Solid lesson. Which channel has worked best for you so far?
Really relatable. How much time do you put into this each week?
Great breakdown. What feedback have you had from early users?
Interesting take. Would you still recommend this approach to someone starting today?
Solid lesson. Which channel has worked best for you so far?
Great breakdown. What feedback have you had from early users?
Good point. Did you test that with users before committing to it?
Makes sense. Are you planning to charge for it, or keep it free for now?
Nice progress. What is the next thing you are focusing on?
Thanks for sharing the numbers, that makes it much easier to follow.
Makes sense. Are you planning to charge for it, or keep it free for now?
Thanks for sharing the numbers, that makes it much easier to follow.
Makes sense. Are you planning to charge for it, or keep it free for now?
Makes sense. Are you planning to charge for it, or keep it free for now?
Makes sense. Are you planning to charge for it, or keep it free for now?
Makes sense. Are you planning to charge for it, or keep it free for now?
Nice progress. What is the next thing you are focusing on?
Thanks for sharing the numbers, that makes it much easier to follow.
Interesting. How are you measuring whether it is working?
How did you decide this was worth building in the first place?
Clear and practical, thanks. Did anything surprise you along the way?
Interesting approach. What was the hardest part to get right?
Interesting. How are you measuring whether it is working?
Makes sense. Are you planning to charge for it, or keep it free for now?
Good write-up. What would you do differently if you started again?
Interesting take. Would you still recommend this approach to someone starting today?
Thanks for sharing the numbers, that makes it much easier to follow.
Makes sense. Are you planning to charge for it, or keep it free for now?
Thanks for sharing the numbers, that makes it much easier to follow.
Nice progress. What is the next thing you are focusing on?
Makes sense. Are you planning to charge for it, or keep it free for now?
Nice progress. What is the next thing you are focusing on?
Thanks for sharing the numbers, that makes it much easier to follow.
Really good writeup, thanks for sharing it. What's the next thing you're planning to try here?
How did you decide this was worth building in the first place?
The “not a feature wishlist” part is smart. Getting people to test against a specific checklist should give you much more useful feedback than open ended beta testing. Also I am curious whether the biggest issues tend to be app-specific behavior or just macOS accessibility quirks.
How did you decide this was worth building in the first place?
Among users of Rectangle and Magnet, what recurring workflow failure are you testing first—and what would show WindowFinesse solves it well enough to replace their current tool?
the main feature is our smart tidy function - we spent a lot of time developing that feature and I think its a solid tool- plus we have more plans to our V2 for even better and more intuitive window management..we want the tool to increase your productivity
Have beta users actually used Smart Tidy repeatedly in their normal workflow yet, or is the replacement case still based mainly on the feature itself?
fair question — we’re still early on that. for this beta we’re not trying to prove “replace Magnet with Smart Tidy only.” we want people to use the full app for a bit (tidy + the rest of the arrangement tools) and tell us what sticks in real work. if you’re up for that, request form is here: https://windowfinesse.com/#beta
Quick update on the thank-you for active testers: free lifetime WindowFinesse licence and $5 CAD to your PayPal account (after you complete the ~30 min checklist and send useful feedback within 14 days).
Request page: https://windowfinesse.com/#beta
How did you decide this was worth building in the first place?
I tried to find an app that could sort the entire desktop in a better way and the price points for that specific feature just didn't make sense to me and the free rectangle didn't have that feature..so I just ran with that..and also as an experiment..But I think its actually a pretty cool app now. will you join the beta and try it? thanks for your input
How did you decide this was worth building in the first place?