As a founder, you’re probably feeling pressure to add AI to your product.
But ship those AI features too fast, and your codebase could turn into chaos. Move too slowly, and you may miss the moment.
Here's how to add AI the right way, whether you’re building your product for users or processes for your team.
AI isn't needed in every part of your product. In fact, some parts should never have it.
First, protect the parts of your product that can’t fail: billing, permissions, database writes, transactions. No AI there — ever.
Once you've done that, look for ways AI can help you safely:
Clear boundaries make everything else easier.
Think of your product as three layers:
This is the part of your app that cannot break.
This layer must always be predictable. No AI here. Ever.
Your AI is only as useful as the data it has access to.
That’s where helper functions come in — small bits of code that fetch the exact context the AI needs to do its job.
Examples:
get_user(email): { plan, usage }
lookup_policy(slug): { title, body }
search_docs(query): [{ snippet, url }]
get_owner(table): "[@oncall](/oncall)"
These helpers give you control over what the AI sees. And they make debugging way easier.
Once your foundation is solid and your functions are clean, AI becomes useful.
It can help with things like:
Golden rule:
Just remember: AI proposes. Your code enforces. You decide. That’s how you keep things stable — and trustworthy.
Don’t try to “AI-ify” everything at once. Pick one workflow and start small.
Pick one workflow and set a clear metric for success. For example: “Reduce first-response time from 9 hours to 2 hours.”
Win one workflow first. Then move to the next.
If you’re building AI features for users, don’t hide them behind extra clicks or separate dashboards.
Put AI where work already happens: inside inboxes, dashboards, and search bars.
When AI shows up naturally, users are much more likely to trust it — and actually use it.
AI can be powerful, but it makes mistakes. Design around that reality.
It also helps to show sources, hide low-confidence results, and default to drafts.
That’s how you move fast without breaking trust.
You probably don’t need a custom model yet.
Start by making sure your AI can find the right information first:
…and make them searchable.
This approach works for both customer-facing assistants and internal tools, and it gets you most of the value without months of model training.
AI failures are sneaky. If you’re not logging, you’re flying blind.
Log:
Then review three metrics weekly:
If you can measure it, you can fix it. If you can’t, you’ll ship blind.
Pick one hour every week to make AI better:
This small ritual compounds into huge quality gains.
Once your first AI feature works:
Move to a second workflow only after the KPI improves.
Reuse your retrieval layer and tools wherever possible.
Keep your deterministic core clean. AI always stays on top, never inside.
This is how you avoid creating a fragile, unmaintainable mess.
I may have found the most solid AI implementation guide yet. I particularly enjoyed the phrase "treat AI like an unreliable intern," which is spot-on. So many teams forget that humans still need to decide.
saving this for later. As I begin incorporating AI into my own side project, I probably will use it as a mental checklist.
This might be the most grounded AI implementation guide I’ve seen so far.
Especially liked the “treat AI like an unreliable intern” part — hits the nail on the head. So many teams forget that humans still need to decide.
Bookmarking this. Will probably use it as a sanity checklist as I start integrating AI into my own side project.
Yes....ai should amplify workflows, not invade them. clean, structured advice.
This is one of the clearest frameworks I’ve seen for adding AI without turning a product into a fragile experiment. The “AI = unreliable intern” mindset is so true — it keeps expectations realistic and protects user trust.
I especially agree with starting with retrieval before fine-tuning. Many founders jump straight into custom models when 80% of value comes from giving AI the right context first.
The layered approach makes this super actionable — thank you for breaking it down so well. 🙌
nice information
This is one of the clearest, most practical takes on adding AI I’ve seen. The idea of protecting the core logic while layering AI on top is solid... too many teams skip that and end up with fragile systems. The “unreliable intern” comparison nails the reality of current AI tools: helpful, but never fully trustworthy.
I especially liked the reminder to focus on retrieval before jumping into fine-tuning. Clean data and good context get you most of the value without the chaos. Simple, structured, and grounded advice that actually translates to better products.
Great write up. Maybe on the sidelines of the core product, I'd add AI-based FAQs for users
Fantastic practical guide! The layered approach really resonates - especially protecting the deterministic core while letting AI enhance the experience. Love the emphasis on starting small with one workflow rather than trying to AI-ify everything at once. This is exactly the kind of measured, strategic thinking we need more of in the AI rush!
we need more leaders to demystify how they're actually incorporating AI into their processes. thanks again