Report
https://ozigi.app
The project is live and already working. I have about 103 users, but I can't do it alone, especially because I am not very marketing savvy. You can reach out on [email protected] or [email protected], or reply to this post.
Honest input on both the co-founder search and the product, since your gap is marketing and that's where I work.
On the co-founder ask: "I need a non-technical co-founder because I'm not marketing savvy" will be hard to fill as written. You're asking someone to take co-founder risk (equity, no salary) off a two-line post. Strong marketers have options and pick based on a relationship or a compelling why. 103 users is a real start but not yet the traction that pulls someone in cold. The people who reply to a post like this are mostly junior or job-seeking, not the senior marketer you need.
Better path at your stage: not a co-founder yet. Find one marketing-minded person to work on a small concrete project first (a launch, a channel test, a positioning pass) and let the relationship earn itself. Work-first-then-co-founder beats the reverse almost every time.
On the product, relevant to your gap: Ozigi does too many things on the page to know what it's for in five seconds. Lead sourcing + email + LinkedIn + newsletter + blog + CRM is a full GTM suite, but the headline sells only cold email. That ambiguity is a conversion killer and probably part of why growth feels stuck. The sharper wedge is in your own copy: "the pipeline and presence of a full GTM team, without the team." That competes with far fewer tools and matches exactly who you are. Lead with it.
What's the one feature your 103 users keep coming back for? That's your real wedge, and your real co-founder pitch.
This makes a lot of sense. Do you think this approach would also work for bootstrapped startups with very small budgets?
They are exactly who it was built for.
interested