I am looking for a non-technical co-founder

Getting to 103 users as a solo founder is already a meaningful sign that people want the product. It might help to share what Ozigi does, who those users are, and whether you’re looking for a marketing partner, co-founder, or contractor. That would make it easier for the right person to understand the opportunity and reach out.

yes

Hello. Love what you are doing. Let's connect.

Hey! Let's try together.

The comments under posts like this always fill with offers, and the hard part is that none of the replies tell you how someone actually works. Interviews are bad at this and cofounder chats are worse. Pick the two most promising people, give each a real two-week task, and let the work decide. It's the entire thesis of the thing I'm building (CoBuildr, trial collaborations before commitment), and it's saved me from at least one bad partnership personally.

Hey Dembi - just reached out. Looking forward to connecting!

hey ! let us start our journey.

What are the requirement?

Hey, I saw your post looking for a partner. I'm a CSE student at NIT Jalandhar. While I have a tech foundation, my absolute focus is business operations, management, and global growth—not writing raw code.

I am completely risk-tolerant, hungry, and have zero opportunity cost. I want to partner with a technical founder to take 100% of the business heavy lifting, outreach, and operational structures off your plate so you can focus entirely on the product architecture. I also have an in-house editor to scale our media organically for free.

I want to hop on a quick 10-minute Zoom call TODAY to see if our execution styles align. Are you free right now? Let me know and I'll drop the link.

Hey I'm interested! Let's connect.

Hi, I'm interested!

Honest input on both the co-founder search and the product, since your gap is marketing and that's where I work.

On the co-founder ask: "I need a non-technical co-founder because I'm not marketing savvy" will be hard to fill as written. You're asking someone to take co-founder risk (equity, no salary) off a two-line post. Strong marketers have options and pick based on a relationship or a compelling why. 103 users is a real start but not yet the traction that pulls someone in cold. The people who reply to a post like this are mostly junior or job-seeking, not the senior marketer you need.

Better path at your stage: not a co-founder yet. Find one marketing-minded person to work on a small concrete project first (a launch, a channel test, a positioning pass) and let the relationship earn itself. Work-first-then-co-founder beats the reverse almost every time.

On the product, relevant to your gap: Ozigi does too many things on the page to know what it's for in five seconds. Lead sourcing + email + LinkedIn + newsletter + blog + CRM is a full GTM suite, but the headline sells only cold email. That ambiguity is a conversion killer and probably part of why growth feels stuck. The sharper wedge is in your own copy: "the pipeline and presence of a full GTM team, without the team." That competes with far fewer tools and matches exactly who you are. Lead with it.

What's the one feature your 103 users keep coming back for? That's your real wedge, and your real co-founder pitch.

This makes a lot of sense. Do you think this approach would also work for bootstrapped startups with very small budgets?

interested