1
0 Comments

I’m building a tool to detect marketplace search trends before they become obvious

Tubes for river floating” improved from rank 1,273,156 to 19,799 across 12 weeks, with every comparable weekly movement trending in the same direction

I’ve been building a small marketplace trend research tool for Amazon sellers, and this is one of the clearest examples I’ve found so far.

The keyword “tubes for river floating” moved from a search rank of roughly 1.27 million to 19,799 over 12 weeks.

Since a lower rank means stronger search demand, that represents a 98.4% improvement.

What interested me wasn’t only the size of the move. It was the structure behind it:

  • 11 out of 11 comparable weekly periods improved

  • 100% historical coverage

  • 100% consistency

  • Moderate volatility

  • Continued positive movement in the most recent weeks

The tool scored it 97/100 — Breakout.

This is the problem I originally wanted to solve for myself: search volume can show what is already popular, but it doesn’t always show whether a keyword is steadily gaining momentum or merely experiencing a temporary spike.

So I started analyzing weekly search-rank history using signals such as:

  • Total rank improvement

  • Week-to-week consistency

  • Recent acceleration or slowdown

  • Volatility

  • Amount of supporting historical data

The goal is to surface marketplace demand while a trend is still developing, before competition and advertising costs fully catch up.

I’m now turning the internal tool into a small SaaS called Uptrend Hunter.

I’d be interested to hear how other founders would approach the scoring. Would you prioritize consistency, acceleration, total improvement, or volatility when deciding whether a trend is real?

posted toAvatar for product Uptrend Hunter
Uptrend Hunter