I’ve been building a small marketplace trend research tool for Amazon sellers, and this is one of the clearest examples I’ve found so far.
The keyword “tubes for river floating” moved from a search rank of roughly 1.27 million to 19,799 over 12 weeks.
Since a lower rank means stronger search demand, that represents a 98.4% improvement.
What interested me wasn’t only the size of the move. It was the structure behind it:
11 out of 11 comparable weekly periods improved
100% historical coverage
100% consistency
Moderate volatility
Continued positive movement in the most recent weeks
The tool scored it 97/100 — Breakout.
This is the problem I originally wanted to solve for myself: search volume can show what is already popular, but it doesn’t always show whether a keyword is steadily gaining momentum or merely experiencing a temporary spike.
So I started analyzing weekly search-rank history using signals such as:
Total rank improvement
Week-to-week consistency
Recent acceleration or slowdown
Volatility
Amount of supporting historical data
The goal is to surface marketplace demand while a trend is still developing, before competition and advertising costs fully catch up.
I’m now turning the internal tool into a small SaaS called Uptrend Hunter.
I’d be interested to hear how other founders would approach the scoring. Would you prioritize consistency, acceleration, total improvement, or volatility when deciding whether a trend is real?